Proteomic analysis predicts anti-angiogenic resistance in recurred glioblastoma

被引:3
|
作者
Jeon, Hanwool [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Byun, Joonho [2 ]
Kang, Hayeong [2 ]
Kim, Kyunggon [3 ]
Lee, Eunyeup [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Kim, Jeong Hoon [2 ]
Hong, Chang Ki [2 ]
Song, Sang Woo [2 ]
Kim, Young-Hoon [2 ]
Chong, Sangjoon [2 ]
Kim, Jae Hyun [2 ]
Nam, Soo Jeong [4 ]
Park, Ji Eun [5 ,6 ]
Lee, Seungjoo [1 ,2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Asan Med Ctr, Asan Inst Life Sci, Translat Biomed Res Grp, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Ulsan, Brain Tumor Ctr, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med,Dept Neurol Surg, 88,Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Asan Inst Life Sci, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Asan Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seoul, South Korea
[5] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[6] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Res Inst Radiol, Asan Med Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[7] Univ Ulsan, Coll Med, Biomed Inst Technol, Seoul, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Anti-angiogenic resistance; Prediction biomarker; Proteomics; VEGF; BEVACIZUMAB; BIOMARKER; CELLS; TRIAL; MUTATIONS; RECEPTORS; THERAPY; TUMORS;
D O I
10.1186/s12967-023-03936-8
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background Recurrence is common in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) because of the infiltrative, residual cells in the tumor margin. Standard therapy for GBM consists of surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the median survival of GBM patients remains poor (similar to 1.5 years). For recurrent GBM, anti-angiogenic treatment is one of the common treatment approaches. However, current anti-angiogenic treatment modalities are not satisfactory because of the resistance to anti-angiogenic agents in some patients. Therefore, we sought to identify novel prognostic biomarkers that can predict the therapeutic response to anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Methods We selected patients with recurrent GBM who were treated with anti-angiogenic agents and classified them into responders and non-responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Then, we performed proteomic analysis using liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues obtained from surgical specimens. We conducted a gene-ontology (GO) analysis based on protein abundance in the responder and non-responder groups. Based on the LC-MS and GO analysis results, we identified potential predictive biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy and validated them in recurrent glioblastoma patients. Results In the mass spectrometry-based approach, 4957 unique proteins were quantified with high confidence across clinical parameters. Unsupervised clustering analysis highlighted distinct proteomic patterns (n = 269 proteins) between responders and non-responders. The GO term enrichment analysis revealed a cluster of genes related to immune cell-related pathways (e.g., TMEM173, FADD, CD99) in the responder group, whereas the non-responder group had a high expression of genes related to nuclear replisome (POLD) and damaged DNA binding (ERCC2). Immunohistochemistry of these biomarkers showed that the expression levels of TMEM173 and FADD were significantly associated with the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with recurrent GBM. ConclusionsThe candidate biomarkers identified in our protein analysis may be useful for predicting the clinical response to anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurred GBM.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proteomic analysis predicts anti-angiogenic resistance in recurred glioblastoma
    Hanwool Jeon
    Joonho Byun
    Hayeong Kang
    Kyunggon Kim
    Eunyeup Lee
    Jeong Hoon Kim
    Chang Ki Hong
    Sang Woo Song
    Young-Hoon Kim
    Sangjoon Chong
    Jae Hyun Kim
    Soo Jeong Nam
    Ji Eun Park
    Seungjoo Lee
    [J]. Journal of Translational Medicine, 21
  • [2] Anti-angiogenic strategies in glioblastoma
    Guillamo, J. -S.
    [J]. REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE, 2011, 167 (10) : 662 - 667
  • [3] Mechanisms of neovascularization and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies in glioblastoma multiforme
    Yasushi Soda
    Chad Myskiw
    Amy Rommel
    Inder M. Verma
    [J]. Journal of Molecular Medicine, 2013, 91 : 439 - 448
  • [4] Mechanisms of neovascularization and resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies in glioblastoma multiforme
    Soda, Yasushi
    Myskiw, Chad
    Rommel, Amy
    Verma, Inder M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM, 2013, 91 (04): : 439 - 448
  • [5] Anti-angiogenic therapies in the management of glioblastoma
    Schulte, Jessica D.
    Aghi, Manish K.
    Taylor, Jennie W.
    [J]. CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 10 (04)
  • [6] Gene expression changes underlying glioblastoma resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy
    Chen, William C.
    Jahangiri, Arman
    Yagnik, Garima
    Sidorov, Maxim
    Rick, Jonathan
    Kuang, Ruby
    DeLay, Michael
    Aghi, Manish K.
    [J]. CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 76
  • [7] METABOLIC ANALYSIS OF GLIOBLASTOMA XENOGRAFTS AFTER ANTI-ANGIOGENIC TREATMENT
    Fack, F.
    Zheng, L.
    Frezza, C.
    Keunen, O.
    Kalna, G.
    Nazarov, P.
    Gottlieb, E.
    Niclou, S. P.
    Bjerkvig, R.
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 : 58 - 58
  • [8] MR spectroscopic imaging predicts early response to anti-angiogenic therapy in recurrent glioblastoma
    Talati, Pratik
    El-Abtah, Mohamed
    Kim, Daniel
    Dietrich, Jorg
    Fu, Melanie
    Wenke, Michael
    He, Julian
    Natheir, Sharif N.
    Vangel, Mark
    Rapalino, Otto
    Vaynrub, Anna
    Arrillaga-Romany, Isabel
    Forst, Deborah A.
    Yen, Yi-Fen
    Andronesi, Ovidiu
    Kalpathy-Cramer, Jayashree
    Rosen, Bruce
    Batchelor, Tracy T.
    Gonzalez, R. Gilberto
    Gerstner, Elizabeth R.
    Ratai, Eva-Maria
    [J]. NEURO-ONCOLOGY ADVANCES, 2021, 3 (01)
  • [9] Evading anti-angiogenic therapy: resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy in solid tumors
    Dey, Nandini
    De, Pradip
    Brian, Leyland-Jones
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2015, 7 (10): : 1675 - 1698
  • [10] Current Role of Anti-Angiogenic Strategies for Glioblastoma
    Thomas, Alissa A.
    Omuro, Antonio
    [J]. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN ONCOLOGY, 2014, 15 (04) : 551 - 566