Staged Revision Hip Arthroplasty With Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting for Prosthetic Joint Infections: Radiostereometric Analyses and Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

被引:0
|
作者
Bunting, Alexandra C. [1 ,2 ]
Costi, Kerry [1 ]
Chimutengwende-Gordon, Mukai [2 ]
Callary, Stuart A. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Pannach, Susan [2 ]
Nelson, Renjy [3 ]
Howie, Donald W. [1 ,2 ]
Solomon, Lucian Bogdan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Orthopaed & Trauma Res, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[2] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[3] Royal Adelaide Hosp, Dept Infect Dis, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Univ Adelaide, Ctr Orthopaed & Trauma, 4 North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2023年 / 38卷 / 12期
关键词
revision hip arthroplasty; femoral impaction grafting; prosthetic joint infection; radiostereometric analysis; Harris hip score; implant subsidence; 2-STAGE REVISION; CEMENTED COLLARLESS; ALLOGRAFT BONE; STEM; SUBSIDENCE; REPLACEMENT; COMPONENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2023.06.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There are ongoing concerns regarding the use of bone graft following prosthetic joint infection and subsequent implant subsidence. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of a cemented stem combined with femoral impaction bone grafting (FIBG) at second stage revision for infection results in stable femoral stem fixation, determined by accurate methods, and good clinical results. Methods: A prospective cohort of 29 patients underwent staged revision total hip arthroplasty for infection using an interval prosthesis followed by FIBG at the final reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 89 months (range, 8 to 167 months). Femoral implant subsidence was measured with radiostereometric analysis. Clinical outcomes included the Harris Hip Score, Harris Pain score and Socie = te = Internationale de Chirurgie Orthope = dique et de Traumatologie activity scores. Results: At 2-years follow-up the median stem subsidence relative to femur was -1.36 mm (range, -0.31 to -4.98), while the cement subsidence relative to femur was -0.05 mm (range, 0.36 to -0.73). At 5years follow-up, the median stem subsidence relative to femur was -1.89 mm (range, -0.27 to -6.35), while the cement subsidence relative to femur was -0.06 mm (range, 0.44 to -0.55). There were 25 patients who were confirmed infection-free after the second stage revision with FIBG. The median Harris Hip Score improved from 51 pre-operatively to 79 at 5 years (P = .0130), and Harris Pain score from 20 to 40 (P = .0038). Conclusions: Stable femoral component fixation can be achieved with FIBG when reconstructing the femur after revision for infection without compromising infection cure rates and patient-reported outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:2716 / 2723.e1
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Femoral Impaction Grafting in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty A Follow-Up of 540 Hips
    Lamberton, Tony D.
    Kenny, Paddy J.
    Whitehouse, Sarah L.
    Timperley, A. John
    Gie, Graham A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (08): : 1154 - 1160
  • [2] Impaction bone-grafting before insertion of a femoral stem with cement in revision total hip arthroplasty - A minimum two-year follow-up study
    Meding, JB
    Ritter, MA
    Keating, EM
    Faris, PM
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1997, 79A (12): : 1834 - 1841
  • [3] Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up of a Cementless, Modular, Tapered Stem in Hip Revision Arthroplasty
    Weiss, Rudiger J.
    Beckman, Mats O.
    Enocson, Anders
    Schmalholz, Anders
    Stark, Andre
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2011, 26 (01): : 16 - 23
  • [4] Cemented femoral impaction bone grafting for severe osteolysis in revision hip arthroplasty - Good results at 4-year follow-up of 10 patients
    Flugsrud, GB
    Ovre, S
    Grogaard, B
    Nordsletten, L
    ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2000, 120 (7-8) : 386 - 389
  • [5] Cemented femoral impaction bone grafting for severe osteolysis in revision hip arthroplasty Good results at 4-year follow-up of 10 patients
    G. B. Flugsrud
    Stein Øvre
    Bjarne Grøgaard
    Lars Nordsletten
    Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 2000, 120 : 386 - 389
  • [6] Acetabular microfracture in hip arthroscopy: clinical outcomes with minimum 5-year follow-up
    Domb, Benjamin G.
    Rybalko, Danil
    Mu, Brian
    Litrenta, Jody
    Chen, Austin W.
    Perets, Itay
    HIP INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 28 (06) : 649 - 656
  • [7] Clinical and radiographic outcomes of acetabular impaction grafting without cage reinforcement for revision hip replacement A MINIMUM TEN-YEAR FOLLOW-UP STUDY
    Gilbody, J.
    Taylor, C.
    Bartlett, G. E.
    Whitehouse, S. L.
    Hubble, M. J. W.
    Timperley, A. J.
    Howell, J. R.
    Wilson, M. J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2014, 96B (02): : 188 - 194
  • [8] Primary and Revision Hip Arthroscopy in Borderline Hip Dysplasia Shows Comparable Outcomes at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up
    Vogel, Michael J.
    Wright-Chisem, Joshua
    Kazi, Omair
    Jan, Kyleen
    Nho, Shane J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2025, 41 (04): : 952 - 962
  • [9] Long-term Follow-up Results of Femoral Revision Hip Arthroplasty Using Impaction Bone Grafting and Standard Cemented Polished Stem
    Park, Jin Sung
    Kweon, Seok Hyun
    Kang, Sung Ju
    Jo, Yang Hun
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (05) : 734 - 739
  • [10] High Failure at a Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Modular Femoral Trunnion
    Nahhas, Cindy R.
    Yi, Paul H.
    Moric, Mario
    Puri, Rajeev
    Jacobs, Joshua J.
    Sporer, Scott M.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07): : 1395 - 1399