Scaling Up Pro-Poor Agrobiodiversity Interventions as a Development Option

被引:1
|
作者
Bernis-Fonteneau, Agnes [1 ,2 ]
Alcadi, Rima
Frangella, Marco [3 ]
Jarvis, Devra I. I. [2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Environm Biol, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[2] Raffaella Fdn, Platform Agrobiodivers Res PAR, 80 Myer Creek Rd, Twisp, WA 98856 USA
[3] ICiTy Social Urban Experience srl, Viale Giulio Cesare 71, I-00192 Rome, Italy
[4] Washington State Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Pullman, WA 99164 USA
[5] Biovers Int, Via San Domenico 1, I-00153 Rome, Italy
关键词
farming communities; climate adaptation; poverty alleviation and empowerment; social environmental conditions; crop varieties; livestock breeds; ANIMAL GENETIC-RESOURCES; AGRICULTURAL BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; SEED BANKS; DIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; TECHNOLOGY; MANAGEMENT; INNOVATION; PEST;
D O I
10.3390/su151310526
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Pro-poor interventions that use agrobiodiversity for development actions are widely considered relevant only at small scales. Agrobiodiversity interventions are often left out of national-level/large-scale development planning. Scaling-up modalities include adaptation, diffusion, replication, value addition, and temporal scaling up. We undertook a review of 119 interventions that use agrobiodiversity for both the crop and the livestock sector. The interventions ranged from improving the availability of materials and information through management and market-oriented actions to changing norms and enabling policies. The interventions are also organized in accordance with farming-community goals and constraints. The open-access multilingual Diversity Assessment Tool for Agrobiodiversity and Resilience (DATAR) was created as a framework to systemize and structure agrobiodiversity interventions under different scaling-up modalities for the on-the-ground field assessment and scaling-up of agrobiodiversity interventions. The use of the framework enabled the scaling up of small-scale interventions that use agrobiodiversity to have impact on agricultural development at larger spatial and temporal scales.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pro-poor sustainable development
    Mack, Joanna
    Pomati, Marco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF POVERTY AND SOCIAL JUSTICE, 2023, 31 (03): : 316 - 317
  • [2] Pro-Poor Local Economic Development in South Africa: The Role of Pro-Poor Tourism
    Rogerson, Christian M.
    [J]. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 11 (01) : 37 - 60
  • [3] Scaling up successful practices for pro-poor development projects involving goats: First outputs of a comparative study
    Dubeuf, Jean-Paul
    Bendapudi, Ramkumar
    Bhandari, Dilip
    Capote, Juan
    Carrasco-Sanchez, Remedios
    Daskiran, Irfan
    Guimaraes, Vinicius
    Iniguez, Luis
    Koluman-Darcan, Nazan
    Peacock, Christie
    Rota, Antonio
    Richkowsky, Barbara
    Sepe, Lucia
    [J]. SMALL RUMINANT RESEARCH, 2014, 121 (01) : 146 - 156
  • [4] Strategies for pro-poor growth: Pro-poor, pro-growth or both?
    Page, John
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2006, 15 (04) : 510 - 542
  • [5] Technology, rural dynamics and pro-poor development
    Linda Waldman
    Andy Sumner
    Melissa Leach
    [J]. The European Journal of Development Research, 2008, 20 (3) : 371 - 376
  • [6] What is “Pro-Poor”?
    Jean-Yves Duclos
    [J]. Social Choice and Welfare, 2009, 32 : 37 - 58
  • [7] What is "Pro-Poor"?
    Duclos, Jean-Yves
    [J]. SOCIAL CHOICE AND WELFARE, 2009, 32 (01) : 37 - 58
  • [8] Pro-Poor Tourism, Climate Change and Sustainable Development
    Peeters, Paul
    [J]. TOURISM RECREATION RESEARCH, 2009, 34 (02) : 203 - 205
  • [9] Managing the environment for development and to sustain pro-poor growth
    Bass, Stephen
    Steele, Paul
    [J]. IDS BULLETIN-INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENT STUDIES, 2006, 37 (03): : 7 - +
  • [10] PRO-POOR TOURISM FOR THE PURPOSE OF RURAL ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT
    Skrbic, Iva
    Jegdic, Vaso
    Milosevic, Srdan
    [J]. EKONOMIKA POLJOPRIVREDA-ECONOMICS OF AGRICULTURE, 2018, 65 (01): : 373 - 389