The effect of shared decision-making in choosing the method of labor analgesia on childbirth experience among primiparous women

被引:9
|
作者
Shahveisi, Maryam [1 ]
Nourizadeh, Roghaiyeh [2 ]
Mehrabi, Esmat [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Student Res Comm, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Fac Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Midwifery, Tabriz, Iran
来源
PLOS ONE | 2023年 / 18卷 / 02期
关键词
MATERNAL SATISFACTION; EPIDURAL ANALGESIA; SUPPORT; PREGNANCY; PATIENT; BIRTH; PERCEPTIONS; SCALE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0274559
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background Childbearing women reported moderate and sometimes low levels of autonomy in decision-making with their health care providers especially about their pain relief type and which may affect their childbirth experience. There is limited evidence about the effect of shared decision-making about childbirth pain relief on childbirth experience and satisfaction. Objective The present study aimed to assess the effect of shared decision-making in choosing the method of labor analgesia on childbirth experience and satisfaction among primiparous women. Methods This interventional study was conducted on 66 primiparous women with 38-42 weeks gestational age and with symptoms of labor and childbirth onset. Women were assigned into the intervention and control groups in a ratio of 1: 1 using blocked randomization. The intervention group received shared decision making about the advantages and disadvantages of labor analgesia methods, and the control group received routine care. Questionnaires, including obstetrics and demographic characteristics, Labor Agentry Scale (LAS), McKay Childbirth Satisfaction Rating Scale (MCSRS), Support and Control In Birth (SCIB) were completed. Data were analyzed by SPSS24 software and independent t-test and ANCOVA were used. Result After the intervention, the mean score of childbirth experience in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group [Mean Difference (MD): 6.77, 95% CI: 2.72 to 10.82, (P <0.001)]. Further, the mean score of childbirth satisfaction in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group [MD: 19.06, 95% CI: 9.63 to 28.49, (P<0.001)]. The mean score of control and support during childbirth and its subscales in the intervention group was significantly higher than that in the control group after the intervention [MD: 17.21, 95% CI: 9.40 to 25.03, (P <0.001)]. Conclusion It is recommended that mothers should be involved in treatment decisions during childbirth since they are considered an important part of providing care during labor and childbirth.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Knowledge and decision-making for tabour analgesia of Australian primiparous women
    Raynes-Greenow, Camille H.
    Roberts, Christine L.
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Clarke, Judith
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2007, 23 (02) : 139 - 145
  • [2] The Choosing Wisely campaign and shared decision-making with Maori
    Tipene-Leach, David
    Adcock, Anna
    Abel, Sally
    Sherwood, Derek
    [J]. NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 134 (1547) : 26 - 33
  • [3] Choosing a Birth Setting: A Shared Decision-Making Approach
    George, Erin K.
    Mitchell, Stephanie
    Stacey, Dawn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2022, 67 (04) : 510 - 514
  • [4] Hospital policy change and childbirth decision-making among rural Tanzanian women
    Patil, C. L.
    Abrams, E. T.
    Antalis, E. J. P.
    Chibber, S.
    Nadimpalli, S. R.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 2013, 25 (02) : 270 - 271
  • [5] Shared decision-making as a method of care
    Montori, Victor M.
    Ruissen, Merel M.
    Hargraves, Ian G.
    Brito, Juan P.
    Kunneman, Marleen
    [J]. BMJ EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE, 2023, 28 (04) : 213 - 217
  • [6] Impact of shared decision-making on women's childbirth preferences: A cluster randomised controlled trial
    Lopez-Gimeno, Encarnacion
    Falguera-Puig, Gemma
    Garcia-Sierra, Rosa
    Vicente-Hernandez, Mercedes
    Cubero, Lucia Burgos
    Seguranyes, Gloria
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2024, 133
  • [7] Barriers to establishing shared decision-making in childbirth: Unveiling epistemic stereotypes about women in labour
    Villarmea, Stella
    Kelly, Brenda
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 26 (02) : 515 - 519
  • [8] SHARED DECISION-MAKING AND DECISION SATISFACTION IN DILATION AND EVACUATION VERSUS INDUCTION OF LABOR AMONG WOMEN UNDERGOING ABORTION FOR PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS
    Mengesha, B.
    Cassidy, A.
    Pearlson, G.
    Kerns, J.
    [J]. CONTRACEPTION, 2016, 94 (04) : 394 - 394
  • [9] Shared Decision-Making in the Management of Women with Epilepsy
    Tripathi, Manjari
    Parihar, Jasmine
    [J]. NEUROLOGY INDIA, 2021, 69 (02) : 435 - 436
  • [10] Shared decision-making for postoperative analgesia A semistructured qualitative study
    van den Berg, Amalia M. A.
    Stalmeier, Peep F. M.
    Scheffer, Gert Jan
    Hermens, Rosella P.
    Bucx, Martin J. L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2019, 36 (01) : 25 - 31