Robotic Rectal Resection for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Reddavid, Rossella [1 ]
Sofia, Silvia [1 ]
Puca, Lucia [1 ]
Moro, Jacopo [1 ]
Ceraolo, Simona [2 ]
Jimenez-Rodriguez, Rosa [3 ]
Degiuli, Maurizio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turin, San Luigi Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Div Surg Oncol & Digest Surg, I-10043 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Clin & Biol Sci, Nursing Degree Program, I-10124 Turin, Italy
[3] Hosp Univ Virgen Rocio, Dept Hematol, Seville 41013, Spain
关键词
rectal cancer; robotic surgery; elderly patients; survival outcomes; postoperative mortality; postoperative morbidity; COLORECTAL-CANCER; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; QUALITY; RISK; MORTALITY; EXCISION; SURVIVAL; OUTCOMES; MARGIN; PLANE;
D O I
10.3390/jcm12165331
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Rectal cancer is estimated to increase due to an expanding aging population, thus affecting elderly patients more frequently. The optimal surgical treatment for this type of patient remains controversial because they are often excluded from or underrepresented in trials. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the feasibility and the safety of robotic surgery in elderly patients (>70 years old) undergoing curative treatment for rectal cancer. Studies comparing elderly (E) and young (Y) patients submitted to robotic rectal resection were searched on PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Data regarding surgical oncologic quality, post-operative, and survival outcomes were extracted. Overall, 322 patients underwent robotic resection (81 in the E group and 241 in the Y group) for rectal cancer. No differences between the two groups were found regarding distal margins and the number of nodes yielded (12.70 in the E group vs. 14.02 in the Y group, p = 0.16). No differences were found in conversion rate, postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay. Survival outcomes were only reported in one study. The results of this study suggest that elderly patients can be submitted to robotic resection for rectal cancer with the same oncologic surgical quality offered to young patients, without increasing postoperative mortality and morbidity.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    Lim, Sang Woo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2018, 33 (12) : 1741 - 1753
  • [2] Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seon Heui Lee
    Dong Hyun Kim
    Sang Woo Lim
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2018, 33 : 1741 - 1753
  • [3] Robotic rectal resection preserves anorectal function: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Grass, Julia K.
    Chen, Chien-Chih
    Melling, Nathaniel
    Lingala, Bharathi
    Kemper, Marius
    Scognamiglio, Pasquale
    Persiani, Roberto
    Tirelli, Flavio
    Caricato, Marco
    Capolupo, Gabriella T.
    Izbicki, Jakob R.
    Perez, Daniel R.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2021, 17 (06):
  • [4] Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome
    Trastulli, S.
    Farinella, E.
    Cirocchi, R.
    Cavaliere, D.
    Avenia, N.
    Sciannameo, F.
    Gulla, N.
    Noya, G.
    Boselli, C.
    [J]. COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2012, 14 (04) : E134 - E156
  • [5] Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Laura Lorenzon
    Fabiano Bini
    Genoveffa Balducci
    Mario Ferri
    Pier Federico Salvi
    Franco Marinozzi
    [J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2016, 31 : 161 - 173
  • [6] Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mechera, Robert
    Schuster, Tibor
    Rosenberg, Robert
    Speich, Benjamin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 72 : 84 - 94
  • [7] Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted colectomy and rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lorenzon, Laura
    Bini, Fabiano
    Balducci, Genoveffa
    Ferri, Mario
    Salvi, Pier Federico
    Marinozzi, Franco
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2016, 31 (02) : 161 - 173
  • [8] Lymph node yield after rectal resection in patients treated with neoadjuvant radiation for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mechera, R.
    Schuster, T.
    Rosenberg, R.
    Speich, B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 : 5 - 5
  • [9] The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tejedor, Patricia
    Sagias, Filippos.
    Flashman, Karen
    Li Kandala, Ngianga
    Khan, Jim
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (06) : 829 - 833
  • [10] Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lee, Seon Heui
    Lim, Sungwon
    Kim, Jin Hee
    Lee, Kil Yeon
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2015, 89 (04) : 190 - 201