Comparison of benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers (BUVs) removal from wastewater after subsequent stages of sequencing batch reactor (SBR) treatment process

被引:1
|
作者
Struk-Sokolowska, Joanna [1 ]
Faszczewska, Alicja [1 ]
Kotowska, Urszula [2 ]
Mielcarek, Artur [3 ]
机构
[1] Bialystok Tech Univ, Fac Civil Engn & Environm Sci, Wiejska 45A, PL-15351 Bialystok, Poland
[2] Univ Bialystok, Fac Chem, Ciolkowskiego 1K, PL-15245 Bialystok, Poland
[3] Univ Warm & Mazury Olsztyn, Fac Geoengn, Warszawska 117a, PL-10720 Olsztyn, Poland
关键词
Benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers; BUVs; UV-326; UV-327; UV-328; UV-329; UV-P; Heterocyclic organic compound; Wastewater treatment; Sequencing batch reactor; SBR; PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; TANDEM MASS-SPECTROMETRY; UV STABILIZERS; ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; BIODEGRADATION; EXTRACTION; PROFILES; SEDIMENT; BENZOTHIAZOLE; ENVIRONMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.169813
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The research focused on benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers (BUVs) which are commonly used compounds despite being found dangerous, e.g. promoting breast cancer cell proliferation, damaging vital organs such as hearts, brains livers and kidneys. The aim of the study was to analyse the efficiency and removal rate of BUVs from wastewater depending on the quantity of tested compounds and SBR anaerobic -aerobic conditions. The study was conducted in sequencing batch reactors (SBRs - 17 L) with real flocculent activated sludge (8 L) and model wastewater (5 L) containing UV -326, UV -327, UV -328, UV -329 and UV -P from 50 to 600 mu g center dot L-1. The SBR were operated in 390 cycles of 7 h and 10 min over 130 days. The similarity of the technological parameters of the treatment process to those used in a real wastewater treatment plant was maintained. Efficiency removal of individual BUVs was strictly dependent on the dose of compounds introduced into wastewater and ranged from 68.2 to 97 %. Removal of UV -329 occurred with lowest efficiency (from 68.2 to 85.2 %) while UV -326 was most efficiently removed from the wastewater (from 94.1 to 97 %). UV -329 was removed from wastewater with the lowest (0.0968-0.9524 mu g center dot L-1 center dot min- 1) average removal rate while UV -327 with the highest (0.16-1.3357 mu g center dot L-1 center dot min- 1), irrespective of BUVs dose in the influent. Secondary release of BUVs into the wastewater occurred in SBR during the settling phase and was dependent on the type and concentration of the BUVs in the raw wastewater. This occurrence was noted for UV -326 >= 100; UV -327 = 600; UV -328 >= 200; UV -329 >= 50 and UV -P >= 100 mu g center dot L-1. The settling phase needs to be shortened to the required minimum. This is an important conclusion for WWTPs in regards to SBR cycle duration and technological parameters of the treatment process.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Analysis of 1H-benzotriazole removal efficiency from wastewater in individual process phases of a sequencing batch reactor SBR
    Struk-Sokolowska, Joanna
    Kotowska, Urszula
    Piekutin, Janina
    Laskowski, Piotr
    Mielcarek, Artur
    WATER RESOURCES AND INDUSTRY, 2022, 28
  • [2] Characteristics of phosphorus removal from wastewater by biofilm sequencing batch reactor (SBR)
    Li, J
    Xing, XH
    Wang, BZ
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2003, 16 (03) : 279 - 285
  • [3] Characteristics of MEG Removal from Industrial Wastewater by Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
    Mahmoudi, Vosough Saeid
    Ariamanesh, Arman
    Jafari, Forough
    Shargh, Jannesar Reza
    Derakhshandeh, Hajar
    Delshadi, Soheil
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING-INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH EDITION, 2020, 39 (01): : 119 - 125
  • [4] Study of COD Removal Rate in Tapioca Wastewater Treatment by Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR)
    Mulyani, Happy
    Budianto, Gregorius Prima Indra
    Margono
    Kaavessina, Mujtahid
    AGRITECH, 2018, 38 (03): : 243 - 250
  • [5] SIMULTANEOUS CARBON AND NUTRIENT REMOVAL FROM DAIRY WASTEWATER IN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR (SBR)
    Pannirselvam, R.
    Ibrahim, V
    Gopalakrishnan, Navaneetha A.
    GLOBAL NEST JOURNAL, 2015, 17 (03): : 628 - 636
  • [6] MODELLING WASTEWATER TREATMENT PROCESS IN A SMALL PLANT USING A SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR (SBR)
    Barsan, Narcis
    Joita, Ion
    Stanila, Marius
    Radu, Cristian
    Dascalu, Mihaela
    ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2014, 13 (07): : 1561 - 1566
  • [7] NITROGEN REMOVAL FROM AMMONIUM-RICH PHARMACEUTICAL WASTEWATER. A COMPARISON BETWEEN SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR (SBR) AND SEQUENCING BATCH BIOFILM REACTOR (SBBR)
    Hajsardar, Mehdi
    Borghei, Seyed Mehdi
    Hassani, Amir Hessam
    Takdastan, Afshin
    ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION ENGINEERING, 2018, 44 (03): : 95 - 115
  • [8] Occurrence and removal of benzotriazole ultraviolet stabilizers in a wastewater treatment plant in China.
    Song, Shanjun
    Ruan, Ting
    Wang, Thanh
    Liu, Runzeng
    Jiang, Guibin
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-PROCESSES & IMPACTS, 2014, 16 (05) : 1076 - 1082
  • [9] Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) for industrial wastewater treatment
    Inizan, M
    Freval, A
    Cigana, J
    Meinhold, J
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (10-11) : 335 - 343
  • [10] Treatment of malting wastewater in a granular sludge sequencing batch reactor (SBR)
    Schwarzenbeck, N
    Erley, R
    Mc Swain, BS
    Wilderer, PA
    Irvine, RL
    ACTA HYDROCHIMICA ET HYDROBIOLOGICA, 2004, 32 (01): : 16 - 24