Machine Learning to Predict Response to Ranibizumab in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration

被引:3
|
作者
Maunz, Andreas [1 ,6 ]
Barras, Laura [2 ]
Kawczynski, Michael G. [3 ]
Dai, Jian [3 ]
Lee, Aaron Y. [4 ]
Spaide, Richard F. [5 ]
Sahni, Jayashree [1 ]
Ferrara, Daniela [3 ]
机构
[1] F Hoffmann La Roche & Cie AG, Roche Pharm Res & Early Dev, Basel, Switzerland
[2] Genentech Inc, Roche Data & Stat Sci, South San Francisco, CA USA
[3] Genentech Inc, Roche Personalized Healthcare Program, South San Francisco, CA USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Seattle, WA USA
[5] Vitreous Retina Macula Consultants New York, New York, NY USA
[6] F Hoffmann La Roche & Cie AG, Grenzacherstr 124, CH-4070 Basel, Switzerland
来源
OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE | 2023年 / 3卷 / 04期
关键词
Machine learning; Optical coherence tomography; Neovascular age-related macular degenration; Prediction; Ranibizumab; 2.0 MG RANIBIZUMAB; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1016/j.xops.2023.100319
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) shows variable treatment response to intravitreal anti-VEGF. This analysis compared the potential of different artificial intelligence (AI)-based machine learning models using OCT and clinical variables to accurately predict at baseline the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 9 months in response to ranibizumab in patients with nAMD.Design: Retrospective analysis.Participants: Baseline and imaging data from patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization sec-ondary to age-related macular dengeration.Methods: Baseline data from 502 study eyes from the HARBOR (NCT00891735) prospective clinical trial (monthly ranibizumab 0.5 and 2.0 mg arms) were pooled; 432 baseline OCT volume scans were included in the analysis. Seven models, based on baseline quantitative OCT features (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator [Lasso] OCT minimum [min], Lasso OCT 1 standard error [SE]); on quantitative OCT features and clinical variables at baseline (Lasso min, Lasso 1SE, CatBoost, RF [random forest]); or on baseline OCT images only (deep learning [DL] model), were systematically compared with a benchmark linear model of baseline age and BCVA. Quantitative OCT features were derived by a DL segmentation model on the volume images, including retinal layer volumes and thicknesses, and retinal fluid biomarkers, including statistics on fluid volume and distribution.Main Outcome Measures: Prognostic ability of the models was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2) and median absolute error (MAE; letters).Results: In the first cross-validation split, mean R2 (MAE) of the Lasso min, Lasso 1SE, CatBoost, and RF models was 0.46 (7.87), 0.42 (8.43), 0.45 (7.75), and 0.43 (7.60), respectively. These models ranked higher than or similar to the benchmark model (mean R2, 0.41; mean MAE, 8.20 letters) and better than OCT-only models (mean R2: Lasso OCT min, 0.20; Lasso OCT 1SE, 0.16; DL, 0.34). The Lasso min model was selected for detailed analysis; mean R2 (MAE) of the Lasso min and benchmark models for 1000 repeated cross-validation splits were 0.46 (7.7) and 0.42 (8.0), respectively. Conclusions: Machine learning models based on AI-segmented OCT features and clinical variables at baseline may predict future response to ranibizumab treatment in patients with nAMD. However, further de-velopments will be needed to realize the clinical utility of such AI-based tools.Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. Ophthalmology Science 2023;3:100319 & COPY; 2023 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
    Rosenfeld, Philip J.
    Brown, David M.
    Heier, Jeffrey S.
    Boyer, David S.
    Kaiser, Peter K.
    Chung, Carol Y.
    Kim, Robert Y.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (14): : 1419 - 1431
  • [2] Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
    Hernandez-Pastor, Luis Javier
    Ortega, Ana
    Garcia-Layana, Alfredo
    Giraldez, Joaquin
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2008, 65 (19) : 1805 - 1814
  • [3] Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration
    Gillies, Mark C.
    Wong, Tien Y.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (07): : 748 - 749
  • [4] Ranibizumab in neovascular age-related macular degeneration
    Eng, Kenneth T.
    Kertes, Peter J.
    [J]. CLINICAL INTERVENTIONS IN AGING, 2006, 1 (04) : 451 - 466
  • [5] A Baseline Score to Predict Response to Ranibizumab Treatment in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Diack, Cheikh
    Schwab, Dietmar
    Cosson, Valerie
    Buchheit, Vincent
    Mazer, Norman
    Frey, Nicolas
    [J]. TRANSLATIONAL VISION SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 10 (06):
  • [6] Bimonthly Ranibizumab for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Cohen, Salomon Yves
    Maloberti, Bertrand
    Fajnkuchen, Franck
    Nghiem-Buffet, Sylvia
    Delahaye-Mazza, Corinne
    Grenet, Typhaine
    Quentel, Gabriel
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2014, 231 (02) : 80 - 85
  • [7] Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration - Reply
    Rosenfeld, Philip J.
    Brown, David M.
    Schneider, Susan
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 356 (07): : 749 - 750
  • [8] Machine Learning to Predict Faricimab Treatment Outcome in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration
    Kikuchi, Yusuke
    Kawczynski, Michael G.
    Anegondi, Neha
    Neubert, Ales
    Dai, Jian
    Ferrara, Daniela
    Quezada-Ruiz, Carlos
    [J]. OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE, 2024, 4 (02):
  • [9] Treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration with Ranibizumab/LucentisTM
    Michels, S
    Rosenfeld, PJ
    [J]. KLINISCHE MONATSBLATTER FUR AUGENHEILKUNDE, 2005, 222 (06) : 480 - 484
  • [10] Ranibizumab for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A review
    Kourlas, Helen
    Abrams, Paris
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 29 (09) : 1850 - 1861