Macro and microstructural evolution of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer mortar exposed to sulphuric acid corrosion

被引:6
|
作者
Ariyadasa, Piumika W. [1 ]
Manalo, Allan C. [1 ]
Lokuge, Weena [2 ]
Aravinthan, Vasantha [3 ]
Gerdes, Andreas [4 ]
Kaltenbach, Jonas [4 ]
Galvan, Beatriz Arevalo [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Future Mat, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[2] Univ Southern Queensland, Ctr Future Mat, Sch Engn, Springfield, Qld 4300, Australia
[3] Univ Southern Queensland, Sch Engn, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia
[4] Karlsruhe Inst Technol, Inst Funct Surfaces, Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
Low-calcium fly ash geopolymer; Laboratory-induced sewer corrosion; Acid neutralisation; Mass change; Microstructural evolution; CONCRETE SEWER; DURABILITY; MECHANISM; DETERIORATION; RESISTANCE; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107436
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This article reports an investigation of the behaviour of a low-calcium fly ash-only geopolymer (FAGP) mortar in comparison to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) mortar and a commercially available geospray mortar (P-GP) under laboratory-induced sewer conditions. An aggressive sewer condition was simulated by an accelerated corrosion rate, with mortar specimens immersed in 0.5pH sulphuric acid at a controlled temperature of 40 C for 31 days. The macro and microstructural evolution of the specimens was analysed through visual observations, mass changes, and SEM coupled with EDS, XRD, and MIP analysis. OPC exhibited a 49 % mass loss attributed to the loss of the gypsum layer formed during the acid attack. The mass reduction in the low-calcium FAGP was only 6 %, which was 42 % lower than that of OPC, indicating that calcium-bearing hydrates in the cementitious binder systems are susceptible to sulphuric acid corrosion. The acid-resistant properties of FAGP mortar suggest its suitability for sewer rehabilitation applications.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Development of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer mortar using nanosilica and hybrid fibers
    Chen, Keyu
    Wu, Dazhi
    Chen, HaiXiang
    Zhang, Guoqing
    Yao, Ruolan
    Pan, Chonggen
    Zhang, Zhenying
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 47 (15) : 21791 - 21806
  • [2] Chloride-induced corrosion of reinforcement in low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Babaee, M.
    Castel, A.
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2016, 88 : 96 - 107
  • [3] DESIGN, PROPERTIES, AND APPLICATIONS OF LOW-CALCIUM FLY ASH-BASED GEOPOLYMER CONCRETE
    Rangan, B. Vijaya
    DEVELOPMENTS IN POROUS, BIOLOGICAL AND GEOPOLYMER CERAMICS, 2008, 28 (09): : 347 - 361
  • [4] Heat-cured, low-calcium, fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology, Perth, Australia
    不详
    不详
    不详
    Indian Concr J, 2006, 6 (47-52):
  • [5] Passivity of embedded reinforcement in carbonated low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Babaee, Mandi
    Khan, M. S. H.
    Castel, Arnaud
    CEMENT & CONCRETE COMPOSITES, 2018, 85 : 32 - 43
  • [6] Investigations on the coefficient of thermal expansion of a low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete
    Ma, Jianxin
    Dehn, Frank
    STRUCTURAL CONCRETE, 2017, 18 (05) : 781 - 791
  • [7] Behavior of low-calcium fly and bottom ash-based geopolymer concrete cured at ambient temperature
    Xie, Tianyu
    Ozbakkaloglu, Togay
    CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 41 (04) : 5945 - 5958
  • [8] Microstructural Analysis of Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete with Different Ratios of Activator and Binder Under High Temperatures
    Kucukgoncu, Hurmet
    Ozbayrak, Ahmet
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024,
  • [9] Corrosion investigation of fly ash based geopolymer mortar in natural sewer environment and sulphuric acid solution
    Khan, Hammad A.
    Castel, Arnaud
    Khan, Mohammad S. H.
    CORROSION SCIENCE, 2020, 168
  • [10] Suitability of heat-cured low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete for precast applications
    Noushini, Amin
    Babaee, Mahdi
    Castel, Arnaud
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2016, 68 (04) : 163 - 177