Quantum Circuit Components for Cognitive Decision-Making

被引:2
|
作者
Widdows, Dominic [1 ]
Rani, Jyoti [2 ]
Pothos, Emmanuel M. [3 ]
机构
[1] IonQ Inc, 4505 Campus Dr, College Pk, MD 20740 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Coll Engn, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] City Univ London, Dept Psychol, London EC1V 0HB, England
关键词
cognitive decision-making; quantum cognition; quantum computing; EXPLANATION; UNCERTAINTY; JUDGMENT; CONTEXT; BRAIN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/e25040548
中图分类号
O4 [物理学];
学科分类号
0702 ;
摘要
This paper demonstrates that some non-classical models of human decision-making can be run successfully as circuits on quantum computers. Since the 1960s, many observed cognitive behaviors have been shown to violate rules based on classical probability and set theory. For example, the order in which questions are posed in a survey affects whether participants answer 'yes' or 'no', so the population that answers 'yes' to both questions cannot be modeled as the intersection of two fixed sets. It can, however, be modeled as a sequence of projections carried out in different orders. This and other examples have been described successfully using quantum probability, which relies on comparing angles between subspaces rather than volumes between subsets. Now in the early 2020s, quantum computers have reached the point where some of these quantum cognitive models can be implemented and investigated on quantum hardware, by representing the mental states in qubit registers, and the cognitive operations and decisions using different gates and measurements. This paper develops such quantum circuit representations for quantum cognitive models, focusing particularly on modeling order effects and decision-making under uncertainty. The claim is not that the human brain uses qubits and quantum circuits explicitly (just like the use of Boolean set theory does not require the brain to be using classical bits), but that the mathematics shared between quantum cognition and quantum computing motivates the exploration of quantum computers for cognition modeling. Key quantum properties include superposition, entanglement, and collapse, as these mathematical elements provide a common language between cognitive models, quantum hardware, and circuit implementations.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The components of decision-making
    Hargrove, T
    [J]. ASHRAE JOURNAL, 2004, 46 (10) : 68 - 69
  • [2] Decision-making in cognitive paradoxes with contextuality and quantum formalism
    Ishwarya, M. S.
    Cherukuri, Aswani Kumar
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 95 (95)
  • [3] Decision-Making & Quantum Mechanical Models of Cognitive Processing
    Park, John Jung
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2016, 17 (02) : 199 - 228
  • [4] Towards a quantum-like cognitive architecture for decision-making
    Moreira, Catarina
    Fell, Lauren
    Dehdashti, Shahram
    Bruza, Peter
    Wichert, Andreas
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2020, 43
  • [5] Cognitive components of degraded decision-making when sleep-deprived
    Van Dongen, H. P. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SLEEP RESEARCH, 2012, 21 : 42 - 42
  • [6] Decision-Making and Cognitive Strategies
    Stiegler, Marjorie P.
    Gaba, David M.
    [J]. SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE, 2015, 10 (03): : 133 - 138
  • [7] Quantum probability and quantum decision-making
    Yukalov, V. I.
    Sornette, D.
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2016, 374 (2058):
  • [8] Quantum Bayesian Decision-Making
    Michael de Oliveira
    Luis Soares Barbosa
    [J]. Foundations of Science, 2023, 28 : 21 - 41
  • [9] Quantum Bayesian Decision-Making
    de Oliveira, Michael
    Barbosa, Luis Soares
    [J]. FOUNDATIONS OF SCIENCE, 2023, 28 (01) : 21 - 41
  • [10] Asymmetric quantum decision-making
    Shiratori, Honoka
    Shinkawa, Hiroaki
    Rohm, Andre
    Chauvet, Nicolas
    Segawa, Etsuo
    Laurent, Jonathan
    Bachelier, Guillaume
    Yamagami, Tomoki
    Horisaki, Ryoichi
    Naruse, Makoto
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)