A hybrid decision making approach for new service development process of renewable energy investment

被引:24
|
作者
Martinez, Luis [1 ]
Dincer, Hasan [2 ]
Yuksel, Serhat [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen, Jaen, Spain
[2] Istanbul Medipol Univ, Istanbul, Turkey
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
q-ROFS; Bipolar fuzzy sets; PERT; Golden cut; M-SWARA; ELECTRE; BALANCED SCORECARD; FUZZY-SETS; CONSUMPTION; SELECTION; SYSTEMS; CHINA; SWARA;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109897
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study aims at evaluating new service development (NSD) process of renewable energy in-vestments. A novel fuzzy hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model is then introduced. Firstly, selected criteria are weighted with a multi stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (M-SWARA) methodology based on bipolar q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets (q-ROFSs) and golden cut. Secondly, balanced scorecard (BSC)-based project network for the NSD process of renewable energy investments is constructed. These alternatives are ranked by using the elimination and choice translating reality (ELECTRE) approach with bipolar q-ROFSs and golden cut. Afterwards, the Project Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) diagram is developed by defining immediate predecessors based on the ranking results. Consequently, different paths are created to understand effective ways to generate NSD process. Our findings will show the crucial processes for the NSD process of renewable energy investments, and the PERT analysis will provide optimal paths to increase the performance of NSD process of the renewable energies. It is concluded that analysis is the most critical NSD process for clean energy investment projects. The findings indicate that the shortest path is defined as Path 2 with 48.6% of the total importance degree. On the other hand, the longest path is determined as Path 1 with 100%. Path 4 has the weakest importance with 65.2% in comparison to Path 3 with 83.4% with respect to the comparison same activity numbers. It is strongly recommended that both technical and financial aspects should be evaluated with necessary research while generating new products. This issue can have a positive contribution to the early solution of any potential problems.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Hybrid Hesitant 2-Tuple IVSF Decision Making Approach to Analyze PERT-Based Critical Paths of New Service Development Process for Renewable Energy Investment Projects
    Cheng, Fei
    Lin, Minhua
    Yuksel, Serhat
    Dincer, Hasan
    Kalkavan, Hakan
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 3947 - 3969
  • [2] Collaboration enhanced hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach to analyze the renewable energy investment projects
    Dincer, Hasan
    Yuksel, Serhat
    Martinez, Luis
    [J]. ENERGY REPORTS, 2022, 8 : 377 - 389
  • [3] Development of a Machine learning assessment method for renewable energy investment decision making
    Izanloo, Milad
    Aslani, Alireza
    Zahedi, Rahim
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2022, 327
  • [4] Electricity Price of Hybrid Power System and Decision Making of Renewable Energy Investment Capacity
    Jiaping XIE
    Weisi ZHANG
    Yu XIA
    Ling LIANG
    Lingcheng KONG
    [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2018, 6 (03) : 193 - 213
  • [5] Heterogeneous or homogeneous? A modified decision-making approach in renewable energy investment projects
    Erfani, Abdolmajid
    Tavakolan, Mehdi
    Mashhadi, Ali Hassandokht
    Mohammadi, Pouria
    [J]. AIMS ENERGY, 2021, 9 (03) : 558 - 580
  • [6] The impact of behavioural factors in the renewable energy investment decision making process: Conceptual framework and empirical findings
    Masini, Andrea
    Menichetti, Emanuela
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 40 : 28 - 38
  • [7] Decision Guidance Framework for a Hybrid Renewable Energy System Investment Model
    Levy, Roberto
    Brodsky, Alexander
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OPERATIONS RESEARCH AND ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS (ICORES), 2021, : 338 - 346
  • [8] Prioritizing Regional Development Programmes: A New Hybrid Decision Making Approach
    Yahya, Kurnia
    Rahman, Titik Khawa Binti Abdul
    Suarga
    [J]. 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CYBERNETICS AND INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS (ICORIS 2021), 2021, : 142 - 146
  • [9] Hybrid Renewable Energy Investment in Microgrid
    Wang, Hao
    Huang, Jianwei
    [J]. 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID COMMUNICATIONS (SMARTGRIDCOMM), 2014, : 602 - 607
  • [10] Models of Decision Making in Planning the Structure of Hybrid Renewable Energy System
    Shulyma, Olha
    Shendryk, Vira
    Parfenenko, Yuliia
    Shendryk, Sergii
    [J]. INFORMATION AND SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (ICIST 2017), 2017, 756 : 213 - 225