Regional pooling in extreme event attribution studies: an approach based on multiple statistical testing

被引:0
|
作者
Zanger, Leandra [1 ]
Buecher, Axel [1 ,2 ]
Kreienkamp, Frank [3 ]
Lorenz, Philip [3 ]
Tradowsky, Jordis S. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Heinrich Heine Univ Dusseldorf, Math Inst, Dusseldorf, Germany
[2] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Fak Math, Bochum, Germany
[3] Deutsch Wetterdienst, Meteorol Observ Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
[4] Norwegian Meteorol Inst, Oslo, Norway
关键词
Extreme event attribution; Extreme value statistics; Homogeneity tests; Multiple comparison problem; Parametric bootstrap; Max-stable processes; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; PRECIPITATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10687-023-00480-y
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
Statistical methods are proposed to select homogeneous regions when analyzing spatial block maxima data, such as in extreme event attribution studies. Here, homogeneitity refers to the fact that marginal model parameters are the same at different locations from the region. The methods are based on classical hypothesis testing using Wald-type test statistics, with critical values obtained from suitable parametric bootstrap procedures and corrected for multiplicity. A large-scale Monte Carlo simulation study finds that the methods are able to accurately identify homogeneous locations, and that pooling the selected locations improves the accuracy of subsequent statistical analyses. The approach is illustrated with a case study on precipitation extremes in Western Europe. The methods are implemented in an R package that allows for easy application in future extreme event attribution studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 32
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Regional pooling in extreme event attribution studies: an approach based on multiple statistical testing
    Leandra Zanger
    Axel Bücher
    Frank Kreienkamp
    Philip Lorenz
    Jordis S. Tradowsky
    Extremes, 2024, 27 : 1 - 32
  • [2] Is the choice of statistical paradigm critical in extreme event attribution studies?
    Stott, Peter A.
    Karoly, David J.
    Zwiers, Francis W.
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2017, 144 (02) : 143 - 150
  • [3] Is the choice of statistical paradigm critical in extreme event attribution studies?
    Peter A. Stott
    David J. Karoly
    Francis W. Zwiers
    Climatic Change, 2017, 144 : 143 - 150
  • [4] Statistical Methods for Extreme Event Attribution in Climate Science
    Naveau, Philippe
    Hannart, Alexis
    Ribes, Aurelien
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF STATISTICS AND ITS APPLICATION, VOL 7, 2020, 2020, 7 : 89 - 110
  • [5] Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and attribution of extreme regional low temperature event
    Feng Tai-Chen
    Zhang Ke-Quan
    Su Hai-Jing
    Wang Xiao-Juan
    Gong Zhi-Qiang
    Zhang Wen-Yu
    CHINESE PHYSICS B, 2015, 24 (10)
  • [6] Spatiotemporal distribution characteristics and attribution of extreme regional low temperature event
    封泰晨
    张珂铨
    苏海晶
    王晓娟
    龚志强
    张文煜
    Chinese Physics B, 2015, (10) : 663 - 670
  • [7] Machine learning-based extreme event attribution
    Trok, Jared T.
    Barnes, Elizabeth A.
    Davenport, Frances V.
    Diffenbaugh, Noah S.
    SCIENCE ADVANCES, 2024, 10 (34):
  • [8] Toward Calibrated Language for Effectively Communicating the Results of Extreme Event Attribution Studies
    Lewis, Sophie C.
    King, Andrew D.
    Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Sarah E.
    Wehner, Michael F.
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2019, 7 (09) : 1020 - 1026
  • [9] Relational Aggression and Hostile Attribution Biases: Testing Multiple Statistical Methods and Models
    Godleski, Stephanie A.
    Ostrov, Jamie M.
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 38 (04) : 447 - 458
  • [10] Relational Aggression and Hostile Attribution Biases: Testing Multiple Statistical Methods and Models
    Stephanie A. Godleski
    Jamie M. Ostrov
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2010, 38 : 447 - 458