Real-World Outcomes of CDK4/6 Inhibitors Treatment in Metastatic Breast Cancer in Romania

被引:8
|
作者
Miron, Andreea-Iuliana [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Anghel, Alexandra-Valentina [1 ]
Barnonschi, Andrei-Alexandru [1 ]
Mitre, Ruxandra [2 ]
Liscu, Horia-Dan [1 ,3 ]
Gainariu, Estera [2 ]
Patru, Raluca [2 ]
Coniac, Simona [2 ]
机构
[1] Carol Davila Univ Med & Pharm, Dept Oncol Radiotherapy & Med Imaging, Bucharest 020021, Romania
[2] Coltea Clin Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Bucharest 030167, Romania
[3] Coltea Clin Hosp, Dept Radiotherapy, Bucharest 030167, Romania
关键词
CDK; 4; 6; inhibitors; metastatic breast cancer HR+; progression-free survival; real-world data; TARGETED THERAPIES; SURVIVAL; FULVESTRANT; WOMEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; ABEMACICLIB; PALBOCICLIB; COMBINATION; TRENDS;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics13111938
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The introduction in clinical practice of selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors improves the outcome of patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (mBC). In Romania, the three available CDK 4/6 inhibitors (Palbociclib, Ribociclib and Ademaciclib) have been approved by the National Agency for Medicines (ANM) in 2019, 2020 and 2021. We conducted a retrospective study from 2019 to 2022 on 107 patients with metastatic breast cancer HR+ that have been treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in addition to hormone therapy in the Oncology Department of Col?ea Clinical Hospital in Bucharest. The purpose of this study is to calculate the median progression-free survival (PFS) and to compare it with the median PFS from other randomized clinical trials. A key difference from other studies is that our study evaluated both patients with non-visceral mBC and patients with visceral mBC, as these two groups often have different outcomes. A total of 79.4% were postmenopausal patients and 20.6% were premenopausal; 42.1% had different stages at the beginning of disease and 57.9% presented newly metastatic disease. Median PFS was 17 months, unlike randomized clinical trials which reported a median PFS of 25.3 months. The combination of CDK 4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy is the golden standard treatment in HR-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, bringing a prolongation of survival for these patients. Our results show no major differences compared to randomized clinical trials, despite the smaller patient group. In order to have a picture of the efficacy of the treatment as close as possible to the real-world data, we believe that it would be very useful to have a collaboration between several oncology departments in different institutions to carry out a multi-center study on large groups of patients.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer: An Italian real-world experience
    Pantano, F.
    Scafetta, R.
    Curigliano, G.
    Criscitiello, C.
    Botticelli, A.
    Caputo, R.
    D'Auria, G.
    Garrone, O.
    Gori, S.
    Meattini, I.
    Minelli, M.
    Piras, M.
    Rossi, L.
    Stucci, L. S.
    Tagliaferri, B.
    Toss, A.
    Vernieri, C.
    Vici, P.
    Tonini, G.
    Santini, D.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2023, 34 : S346 - S347
  • [2] Real-world outcomes from use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the management of advanced/metastatic breast cancer in Asia
    Low, Jia Li
    Lim, Elaine
    Bharwani, Lavina
    Wong, Andrea
    Wong, Karmen
    Ow, Samuel
    Lim, Siew Eng
    Lee, Matilda
    Choo, Joan
    Lim, Joline
    Chan, Gloria
    Walsh, Robert John
    Muthu, Vaishnavi
    Ngoi, Natalie
    Chong, Wanqin
    Tan, Sing Huang
    Lee, Soo Chin
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 14
  • [3] Real-world (RW) utilization and patient outcomes across three CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer (mBC)
    Weipert, Caroline
    Wander, Seth
    Davis, Andrew
    Bucheit, Leslie
    Saha, Jayati
    Liao, Jiemin
    Zhang, Nicole
    Stover, Daniel
    Bardia, Aditya
    Cristofanilli, Massimo
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (09)
  • [4] CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer
    Ettl, Johannes
    Huober, Jens
    Lueftner, Diana
    Marme, Frederik
    Wuerstlein, Rachel
    BREAST CARE, 2017, 12 (02) : 118 - 120
  • [5] A Real-World Evidence Study of CDK4/6 Inhibitor Treatment Patterns and Outcomes in Metastatic Breast Cancer by Gbrcamutation Status
    Untch, Michael
    Fasching, Peter Andreas
    Mclaurin, Kimmie
    ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2020, 43 : 11 - 11
  • [6] CDK4/6 inhibitors and endocrine therapy in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: A real-world and propensity score-adjusted comparison
    Coutinho-Almeida, Joao
    Silva, Ana Sofia
    Redondo, Patricia
    Rodrigues, Pedro Pereira
    Ferreira, Ana
    CANCER TREATMENT AND RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 40
  • [7] CDK4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer, a comparison of toxicity and efficacy across agents in a real-world dataset
    Buller, William
    Pallan, Lalit
    Chu, Teresa
    Khoja, Leila
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2023, 29 (08) : 1825 - 1835
  • [8] Real-World Analysis of Breast Cancer Patients Qualifying for Adjuvant CDK4/6 Inhibitors
    Kanjanapan, Yada
    Anderson, Wayne
    Smith, Mirka
    Green, Jenny
    Chalker, Elizabeth
    Craft, Paul
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2025, 25 (02)
  • [9] A real-world evidence study of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment patterns and outcomes in metastatic breast cancer by gBRCA mutation status
    McLaurin, Kimmie
    Dalvi, Tapashi
    Collins, Jenna M.
    Nordstrom, Beth L.
    McCutcheon, Susan
    Bennett, James C.
    Murphy, Brian R.
    Singhal, Puneet K.
    Briceno, Josefa Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 37 (15)
  • [10] Real-World Outcomes of Everolimus and Exemestane for the Treatment of Metastatic Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer in Patients Previously Treated With CDK4/6 Inhibitors
    Mo, Hanjie
    Renna, Catherine E.
    Moore, Halle C. F.
    Abraham, Jame
    Kruse, Megan L.
    Montero, Alberto J.
    LeGrand, Susan B.
    Wang, Lu
    Budd, G. Thomas
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2022, 22 (02) : 143 - 148