Was stakeholder participation in the PEFC revision process successful in Slovakia?

被引:3
|
作者
Palus, Hubert [1 ]
Marcinekova, Lenka [2 ]
Salka, Jaroslav [2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Zvolen, Fac Wood Sci & Technol, Dept Mkt Trade & World Forestry, TG Masaryka 24, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
[2] Tech Univ Zvolen, Fac Forestry, Dept Forest Econ & Policy, TG Masaryka 24, Zvolen 96001, Slovakia
关键词
Standard setting; PEFC; Revision process; Stakeholders; Consensus; STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL CERTIFICATION; FOREST CERTIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; GOVERNANCE; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; IMPACTS; TOOL; LEGITIMACY; LADDER;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103118
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The complexity and comprehensiveness of sustainability issues considered by forest certification schemes require knowledge based and transparent decision-making process. Therefore, open and multi-stakeholder participation in setting sustainable forest management criteria and rules for supporting managerial processes is the main requirement of forest certification systems. For global schemes utilising bottom-up approach, such as the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC)) or the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), the transformation of requirements defined by international metastandards into the regional or national level is crucial for its successful implementation and consequent global recognition. The main aim of this study is to examine the latest PEFC national sustainable forest management standard revision process in the Slovak Republic from the viewpoint of stakeholder participation. To assess the success and effectiveness of the process the emphasis is on the evaluation of the level of stakeholder participation, their expectations and contribution to the process and barriers and opportunities for participation. More specifically, trust among participating stakeholders, conflicts resolution and overall satisfaction with the results achieved is examined. The results of the study revealed that the stakeholders involved in the revision process are well informed about the PEFC certification in Slovakia and understand its importance for SFM processes. Additionally, stakeholders are fully aware of their roles in the participatory process linking them with the roles of their organisations. Results also indicate that formal rules of consensus-based participation informal aspects such as voluntary self-exclusion, education of the participants contributed to the improvement of trust between the participants, overall satisfaction and the perception of the revision process as effective. As the importance of participation in forest certification for forestry policy also lies in learning processes, revealed relations can be a useful benchmark for other countries with lacking or inadequate culture of participation and their mutual comparison.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Standards Revision Process: Stakeholder Input
    Eatmon, Stephanie
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 88 (01) : 74 - 75
  • [2] Citizen participation, stakeholder involvement and the planning process in Portugal
    Baptista, Idalina
    ARCHITECTURE D AUJOURD HUI, 2006, 366 : 32 - 36
  • [3] Multi-stakeholder participation for successful implementation of applied research projects in Africa
    Mganga, Kevin Z. Z.
    Kaindi, Eric
    Bosma, Luwieke
    Amollo, Kevin O. O.
    Munyoki, Bobsammy
    Kioko, Theophilus
    Kadenyi, Nancy
    Musyoki, Gilbert K. K.
    Wambua, Stephen M. M.
    Ndathi, Aphaxard J. N.
    van Steenbergen, Frank
    Musimba, Nashon K. R.
    ECOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND EVIDENCE, 2023, 4 (02):
  • [4] Stakeholder Participation in REDD+ Program: The Case of the Consultation Process in Laos
    Sawathvong, Soukphavanh
    Hyakumura, Kimihiko
    Fujisaki, Taiji
    LAND, 2024, 13 (08)
  • [5] Stakeholder Participation in Marine Spatial Plan Making Process in Lampung Province
    Asirin
    Asbi, A. M.
    Pakpahan, V. H.
    1ST ITB CENTENNIAL AND 4TH PLANOCOSMO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 2018, 158
  • [6] Biodiversity and stakeholder participation
    Jones-Walters, Lawrence
    Cil, Aysegul
    JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2011, 19 (06) : 327 - 329
  • [7] Participation, Process, and Partnerships Climate Change and Long-term Stakeholder Engagement
    Furman, Carrie
    Bartels, Wendy-Lin
    Bolson, Jessica
    ANTHROPOLOGY IN ACTION-JOURNAL FOR APPLIED ANTHROPOLOGY IN POLICY AND PRACTICE, 2018, 25 (03) : 1 - 12
  • [8] An equity crowdfunding research agenda: evidence from stakeholder participation in the rulemaking process
    Cummings, Michael E.
    Rawhouse, Hans
    Vismara, Silvio
    Hamilton, Erin L.
    SMALL BUSINESS ECONOMICS, 2020, 54 (04) : 907 - 932
  • [9] An equity crowdfunding research agenda: evidence from stakeholder participation in the rulemaking process
    Michael E. Cummings
    Hans Rawhouser
    Silvio Vismara
    Erin L. Hamilton
    Small Business Economics, 2020, 54 : 907 - 932
  • [10] A framework of stakeholder analysis for public participation in EIA process: a case study of Thailand
    Kantamaturapoj, Kanang
    Chanchitpricha, Chaunjit
    Hongsuwan, Parinee
    Suebsing, Pannipa
    Thaweesuk, Suwicha
    Wibulpolprasert, Suwit
    IMPACT ASSESSMENT AND PROJECT APPRAISAL, 2023, 41 (06) : 444 - 462