Connectivity shapes delivery of multiple ecological benefits from restoration

被引:2
|
作者
Rummell, Ashley J. [1 ]
Borland, Hayden P. [1 ]
Hazell, Jackson J. [1 ]
Mosman, Jesse D. [1 ]
Leon, Javier X. [1 ]
Henderson, Christopher J. [1 ]
Gilby, Ben L. [2 ]
Olds, Andrew D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Maroochydore, Qld 4558, Australia
[2] Univ Sunshine Coast, Sch Sci Technol & Engn, Petrie, Qld 4502, Australia
关键词
Co-benefits; Biodiversity; Wetlands; Fisheries; Landscape context; Spatial planning; OYSTER REEF RESTORATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; FISH ASSEMBLAGES; HABITAT CONNECTIVITY; SEASCAPE CONNECTIVITY; NURSERY FUNCTION; MARINE RESERVES; SALT-MARSH; ESTUARINE; BIODIVERSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2023.110358
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Connectivity and landscape context are common considerations in the spatial prioritisation of conservation actions. Similar spatial principles can also be used to inform the selection, prioritisation and monitoring of sites for restoration, but it is not clear whether these variables consistently shape the delivery of benefits from restoration. This study aimed to determine whether, and how, seascape connectivity and landscape context combine to influence the recovery of fish and crustacean communities at a restoring coastal wetland. We measured changes to biodiversity (fish species richness), fisheries benefits (fisheries harvested abundance) and functioning (fish functional diversity) bi-annually at a 200 ha restoring wetland, and three control sites, in eastern Australia between 2017 and 2021. Connectivity and landscape context were quantified using a combination of in-field measurements, remote sensing techniques and least-cost path analysis. Biodiversity, fisheries benefits, and functional diversity increased at the restoration site over time, but these metrics did not change significantly at any of the control sites over the same time period. The delivery of each of the three co-benefits at the restoration site was also positively linked to increased wetland connectivity, larger areas of mangroves and higher salinity levels in the recovering seascape. These results support tighter integration of connectivity and landscape context to optimise and inform spatial planning in restoration, and we suggest that this is essential for supporting the delivery of multiple benefits from recovering habitats and seascapes. Adopting similar approaches to understand the drivers of restoration success would improve the ecological and economic outcomes of actions.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Identifying restoration hotspots that deliver multiple ecological benefits
    Gilby, Ben L.
    Olds, Andrew D.
    Duncan, Cassandra K.
    Ortodossi, Nicholas L.
    Henderson, Christopher J.
    Schlacher, Thomas A.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2020, 28 (01) : 222 - 232
  • [2] Where to Restore Ecological Connectivity? Detecting Barriers and Quantifying Restoration Benefits
    McRae, Brad H.
    Hall, Sonia A.
    Beier, Paul
    Theobald, David M.
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (12):
  • [3] Ecosystem service delivery in restoration projects: the effect of ecological succession on the benefits of tidal marsh restoration
    Boerema, Annelies
    Geerts, Lindsay
    Oosterlee, Lotte
    Temmerman, Stijn
    Meire, Patrick
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2016, 21 (02):
  • [4] Monitoring the social benefits of ecological restoration
    Martin, David M.
    Lyons, James E.
    RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 (06) : 1045 - 1050
  • [5] Ecological restoration volunteers: the benefits of participation
    Irene Miles
    William C. Sullivan
    Frances E. Kuo
    Urban Ecosystems, 1998, 2 (1) : 27 - 41
  • [6] From single to multiple habitat connectivity: The key role of composite ecological networks for amphibian conservation and habitat restoration
    Clauzel, Celine
    Godet, Claire
    Tarabon, Simon
    Eggert, Christophe
    Vuidel, Gilles
    Bailleul, Marion
    Miaud, Claude
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2024, 289
  • [7] Ecological restoration of hyporheic zone based on connectivity restoration: a review
    Wang L.
    Wang Z.
    Li Y.
    Shuikexue Jinzhan/Advances in Water Science, 2022, 33 (06): : 1009 - 1020
  • [8] Accounting for private benefits in ecological restoration planning
    Polyakov, Maksym
    Pannell, David
    LEARNING FROM AGRI-ENVIRONMENT SCHEMES IN AUSTRALIA: INVESTING IN BIODIVERSITY AND OTHER ECOSYSTEM SERVICES ON FARMS, 2016, : 181 - 190
  • [9] High value of ecological information for river connectivity restoration
    Sethi, Suresh Andrew
    O'Hanley, Jesse R.
    Gerken, Jonathon
    Ashline, Joshua
    Bradley, Catherine
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2017, 32 (12) : 2327 - 2336
  • [10] Ecological restoration planning based on connectivity in an urban area
    Yu, Deyong
    Xun, Bin
    Shi, Peijun
    Shao, Hongbo
    Liu, Yupeng
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2012, 46 : 24 - 33