Benchmarking usability of patient portals in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden

被引:1
|
作者
Kujala, Sari [1 ,10 ]
Simola, Saija [1 ]
Wang, Bo [2 ]
Soone, Hedvig [3 ]
Hagstrom, Josefin [4 ,5 ]
Barkas, Annika [4 ,5 ]
Horhammer, Iiris [1 ]
Cajander, Asa [5 ]
Fagerlund, Asbjorn Johansen [2 ]
Kane, Bridget [4 ,6 ]
Kharko, Anna [4 ,5 ,7 ]
Kristiansen, Eli [2 ]
Moll, Jonas [8 ]
Rexphepi, Hanife [9 ]
Hagglund, Maria [4 ]
Johansen, Monika A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Espoo, Finland
[2] Univ Hosp North Norway, Norwegian Ctr EHlth Res, Tromso, Norway
[3] Tallinn Univ Technol, E Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Technol, Tallinn, Estonia
[4] Uppsala Univ, Dept Womens & Childrens Hlth, Participatory Ehlth & Hlth Data Res Grp, Uppsala, Sweden
[5] Uppsala Univ Hosp, Medtech Sci & Innovat Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Karlstad Univ, Business Sch, Karlstad, Sweden
[7] Univ Plymouth, Fac Hlth, Plymouth, England
[8] Orebro Univ, Ctr Empir Res Informat Syst, Orebro, Sweden
[9] Univ Skovde, Sch Informat, Skovde, Sweden
[10] Aalto Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Konemiehentie 2, FI-00076 Espoo, Finland
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Electronic health records; Patient-accessible electronic health records; PAEHR; Online record access; ORA; Patient portal; Usability benchmarking; Cross-national; Survey; EXPERIENCES; CHALLENGES; BARRIERS; RECORDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2023.105302
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Introduction: Poor usability is a barrier to widespread adoption of electronic health records (EHR). Providing good usability is especially challenging in the health care context, as there is a wide variety of patient users. Usability benchmarking is an approach for improving usability by evaluating and comparing the strength and weaknesses of systems. The main purpose of this study is to benchmark usability of patient portals across countries. Methods: A mixed-methods survey approach was applied to benchmark the national patient portals offering patient access to EHR in Estonia, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. These Nordic countries have similar public healthcare systems, and they are pioneers in offering patients access to EHR for several years. In a survey of 29,334 patients, both patients' quantitative ratings of usability and their qualitative descriptions of very positive and very negative peak experiences of portal use were collected. Results: The usability scores ranged from good to fair level of usability. The narratives of very positive and very negative experiences included the benefits of the patient portals and experienced usability issues. The regression analysis of results showed that very positive and negative experiences of patient portal use explain 19-35% of the variation of usability scores in the four countries. The percentage of patients who reported very positive or very negative experiences in each country was unrelated to the usability scores across countries. Conclusions: The survey approach could be used to evaluate usability with a wide variety of users and it supported learning from comparison across the countries. The combination of quantitative and qualitative data provided an approximation of the level of the perceived usability, and identified usability issues to be improved and useful features that patients appreciate. Further work is needed to improve the comparability of the varied samples across countries.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The NORDeHEALTH 2022 Patient Survey: Cross-Sectional Study of National Patient Portal Users in Norway, Sweden, Finland, and Estonia
    Hagglund, Maria
    Kharko, Anna
    Hagstrom, Josefin
    Barkas, Annika
    Blease, Charlotte
    Cajander, Asa
    DesRoches, Catherine
    Fagerlund, Asbjorn Johansen
    Haage, Barbara
    Huvila, Isto
    Horhammer, Iiris
    Kane, Bridget
    Klein, Gunnar O.
    Kristiansen, Eli
    Luks, Kerli
    Moll, Jonas
    Muli, Irene
    Raphaug, Eline Hovstad
    Rexhepi, Hanife
    Riggare, Sara
    Ross, Peeter
    Scandurra, Isabella
    Simola, Saija
    Soone, Hedvig
    Wang, Bo
    Zolbin, Maedeh Ghorbanian
    Ahlfeldt, Rose-Mharie
    Kujala, Sari
    Johansen, Monika Alise
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [2] Securitization of Energy Transitions in Estonia, Finland and Norway
    Sivonen, Marja Helena
    Kivimaa, Paula
    INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL SOCIOLOGY, 2024, 18 (03)
  • [3] COMBINING WORK AND PARENTHOOD IN ESTONIA, SWEDEN AND FINLAND
    Podder, Helbe
    Kirch, Aksel
    EUROPEAN INTEGRATION STUDIES, 2013, (07) : 60 - 70
  • [4] AGRICULTURAL PROTECTION IN FINLAND, NORWAY AND SWEDEN
    BRINK, L
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIE RURALE, 1989, 37 (04): : 1145 - 1154
  • [5] History of footwear in Norway, Sweden and Finland
    Loschek, I
    WAFFEN-UND KOSTUMKUNDE, 2002, 44 (01): : 100 - 101
  • [6] The Northern Nations: Norway, Sweden, Finland
    Ekblaw, W. Elmer
    ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY, 1926, 2 (03) : 454 - 454
  • [7] Permafrost Map for Norway, Sweden and Finland
    Gisnas, Kjersti
    Etzelmuller, Bernd
    Lussana, Cristian
    Hjort, Jan
    Sannel, A. Britta K.
    Isaksen, Ketil
    Westermann, Sebastian
    Kuhry, Peter
    Christiansen, Hanne H.
    Frampton, Andrew
    Akerman, Jonas
    PERMAFROST AND PERIGLACIAL PROCESSES, 2017, 28 (02) : 359 - 378
  • [8] Nordic Lands: Norway, Sweden, Finland
    Sieger, R.
    PETERMANNS MITTEILUNGEN, 1924, 70 (5-6): : 150 - 150
  • [9] Professionalism of preschool teachers in Estonia, Finland, Sweden and Hungary
    Peterson, Tiina
    Veisson, Marika
    Hujala, Eeva
    Harkonen, Ulla
    Sandberg, Anette
    Johansson, Inge
    Bakosi, Eva Kovacsne
    EUROPEAN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2016, 24 (01) : 136 - 156
  • [10] Studded tire research in Norway, Finland and Sweden
    Johnson, E
    Barter, T
    Sterley, D
    COLD REGIONS ENGINEERING: THE COLD REGIONS INFRASTRUCTURE: AN INTERNATIONAL IMPERATIVE FOR THE 21ST CENTURY, 1996, : 676 - 687