Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on YouTube Regarding Angiography and Angioplasty

被引:1
|
作者
Nazar, Tanya [1 ]
Namala, Spurthy [2 ]
Yelagapuri, Rohit Rao [3 ]
Halder, Abhik [4 ,5 ]
Vora, Neera N. [6 ]
Doshi, Preyansh [6 ]
机构
[1] Govt Med Coll, Internal Med, Kozhikode, India
[2] Gandhi Med Coll, Internal Med, Hyderabad, India
[3] Ramdev Rao Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Hyderabad, India
[4] IQ City Med Coll & Narayana Multispecialty Hosp, Med, Durgapur, India
[5] Narayana Multispecialty Hosp, Durgapur, India
[6] Gujarat Canc Soc GCS Med Coll Hosp & Res Ctr, Internal Med, Ahmadabad, India
关键词
minimally invasive interventional radiology; cardiology; reliability score; global quality score; angiography and angioplasty; youtube;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.45885
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Angiography is a method for defining the inner vessel wall and demonstrating flow through the lumen by detecting contrast injection into a blood vessel and projecting it onto a sequence of X-rays. This method is used to image the anatomical and architectural aspects of the vascular system. By employing balloon dilatation and the implantation of stents to widen the stenosed arteries, angioplasty is a form of minimally invasive endovascular treatment used to treat cardiovascular diseases and their consequences. People frequently rely on YouTube as a resource for awareness-raising and marketing activities. Animations and visual explanations can help patients understand the risks and benefits of procedures. Aims To assess the quality and reliability of the information on YouTube about angiography and angioplasty. We assessed quality using the GQS (Global Quality Scale) and reliability via the reliability score. Methodology This is an observational, cross-sectional study without the requirement of an ethics committee. It includes a questionnaire with predetermined criteria like time since upload, popularity, or type of uploader. The study assesses YouTube videos that include criteria using GQS and reliability scores. Responses recorded in Google Sheets were transferred to Microsoft Excel (Redmond, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. All six authors assessed 10 YouTube videos using specific keywords. The study includes videos that meet the inclusion criteria. Videos that did not include the inclusion criteria were excluded. Results After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 57 out of 60 videos were included. Of the total videos analyzed, the majority were uploaded by various hospitals and people other than doctors and healthcare organizations. About 78.95% of the videos described the reason for angiography/plasty, followed by the anatomical area involved and the pre-procedural preparation phase. There is a significant increase in the GQS score and reliability score among the videos uploaded by doctors, hospitals, healthcare organizations, and other groups. Conclusions Verified health information should be uploaded responsibly by doctors, hospitals, healthcare organizations, or other agencies on social media like YouTube in a manner that is easy to understand, has a high GQS, and has a high reliability score, as it would make it simpler for the general population or viewers to have access to important health-related content they can rely on. Videos should advise the viewers to contact their doctors for all queries regarding the diagnosis or treatment of their health concerns.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of the quality and reliability of the information on spasticity on youtube
    Uz, Cuma
    Umay, Ebru
    Uz, Fatma Balli
    Cankurtaran, Damla
    Gundogdu, Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 113 : 142 - 146
  • [2] An assessment of the Quality of Information for Patients on YouTube™ Regarding Orthodontic Elastics
    Ozkan, Tugba Haliloglu
    Dursun, Derya
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2022, 35 (03) : 192 - 197
  • [3] YouTube as a Source of Information on Lipedema: Property, Quality, and Reliability Assessment
    Ozdemir, Elif Esen
    Borman, Pinar
    Civelek, Gül Mete
    Umaroglu, Mumtaz Mütlu
    LYMPHATIC RESEARCH AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 21 (04) : 403 - 409
  • [4] Assessment of the Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of Information About Retinoblastoma on YouTube
    Karaca, Berkay OEner
    Tellioglu, Adem
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OPHTHALMOLOGY & STRABISMUS, 2025, 62 (01) : 33 - 38
  • [5] An Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Gastric Botox Information Videos on YouTube
    Ertekin, Suleyman Caglar
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (09)
  • [6] Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of the Information on Rotator Cuff Repair on YouTube
    Celik, Haluk
    Polat, Omer
    Ozcan, Cagri
    Camur, Savas
    Kilinc, Bekir Eray
    Uzun, Metin
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (01) : 31 - 34
  • [7] An Objective Comparison of the Quality and Reliability of Information Regarding Autism Spectrum Disorder on YouTube
    Chakrabarty, Deeksha
    Arora, Nikhil
    Ahmed, Iffath Muneer
    Satish, Sruthi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [8] Assessment of the Quality of Information of YouTube Videos Regarding Cervical Disc Replacement
    Martyn, Tanushk Luke Brito
    Baker, Joseph Frederick
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2022, 16 (02): : 272 - 277
  • [9] Assessment of Video Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos Regarding Meniscus Tear Rehabilitation
    Abed, Varag
    Ray, Matthew
    Smathers, Joseph
    Stone, Austin, V
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (03)
  • [10] Assessment of the Quality and Reliability of Information on Nutrition After Bariatric Surgery on YouTube
    Nazlı Batar
    Seda Kermen
    Sezen Sevdin
    Nida Yıldız
    Duygu Güçlü
    Obesity Surgery, 2020, 30 : 4905 - 4910