Separation of D-Limonene and Other Oxygenated Compounds from Orange Essential Oil by Molecular Distillation and Fractional Distillation with a Wiped Film Evaporator

被引:4
|
作者
Garcia-Fajardo, Jorge Alberto [1 ]
Flores-Mendez, David Antonio [2 ]
Suarez-Jacobo, Angela [3 ]
Torres-Martinez, Lilia Guadalupe [1 ]
Granados-Vallejo, Miriam [3 ]
Corona-Gonzalez, Rosa Isela [4 ]
Guatemala-Morales, Guadalupe Maria [3 ]
Arriola-Guevara, Enrique [4 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Invest & Asistencia Tecnol & Diseno Estado Jal, Via Innovac 404, Parque PIIT, Apodaca 66628, Mexico
[2] Tecnol Nacl Mexico Celaya, Dept Ingn Quim, Antonio Garcia Cubas 600, Celaya 38010, Mexico
[3] Ctr Invest & Asistencia Tecnol & Diseno Estado Jal, Tecnol Alimentaria, AS J, Normalistas 800, Guadalajara 44270, Mexico
[4] CUCEI Univ Guadalajara, Dept Ingn Quim, Blvd Marcelino Garcia Barragan 1421, Guadalajara 44430, Mexico
关键词
orange essential oil; molecular distillation; fractional distillation; D-Limonene; SINENSIS L. OSBECK; COLD-PRESSED OILS; PEEL OIL; COMPONENTS; EXTRACTION;
D O I
10.3390/pr11040991
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Orange essential oil (OEO) is mainly composed of D-Limonene and other oxygenated compounds that contribute to the orange flavor and aroma. However, D-Limonene is unstable in the presence of heat, light, and water, affecting the quality of the OEO. Therefore, the objective of this study was to fractionate OEO by distillation, both molecular and fractionated (hybrid), producing a D-Limonene-rich fraction. The OEO was characterized by physicochemical tests and gas chromatography combined with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The fractionation of the OEO was carried out by molecular distillation and fractional distillation following, in both cases, a factorial design (2(3)) with central points, considering the D-Limonene percentage in the distillate and the residue as a response variable. According to the physicochemical characterization, the predominant optical isomer was dextrorotatory, where D-Limonene is the main component of OEO (92.584%). For molecular distillation, the D-Limonene content was reduced to 47.964% in the residue or deterpenated fraction, while for fractional distillation, it was 86.779%. For this study, molecular distillation was considered a non-thermal process (use of low temperatures) that promoted the efficient recovery of oxygenated compounds. In contrast, fractional distillation favored the recovery of D-Limonene in the light fraction.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 6 条
  • [1] D-LIMONENE AND GERANIAL FRACTIONATION FROM LEMON ESSENTIAL OIL BY MOLECULAR DISTILLATION
    Rossi, P. C.
    Willnecker, A. A.
    Berti, J.
    Borgarello, A. V.
    Mezza, G. N.
    Pramparo, M. C.
    LATIN AMERICAN APPLIED RESEARCH, 2011, 41 (01) : 81 - 85
  • [2] Distillation rate and separation efficiency of two-component mixture in wiped-film molecular evaporator
    Kaplon, J
    INZYNIERIA CHEMICZNA I PROCESOWA, 2001, 22 (3C): : 621 - 626
  • [3] Feasibility of fractional distillation of Eucalyptus hybrida essential oil for the separation of valuable compounds
    Chauhan, Nirpendra
    Lohani, Hema
    Shrivastava, Shanjul
    Kumar, Vikas
    Haider, S. Zafar
    Bhandari, Ujjwal
    JOURNAL OF ESSENTIAL OIL BEARING PLANTS, 2024, 27 (04) : 1019 - 1034
  • [4] Protective effect of D-limonene derived from orange peel essential oil against Yersinia ruckeri in rainbow trout
    Gultepe, Nejdet
    AQUACULTURE REPORTS, 2020, 18
  • [5] Optimization of wiped-film short path molecular distillation for recovery of cannabinoids from cannabis oil using response surface methodology
    Sagili, Sai Uday Kumar Reddy
    Addo, Philip Wiredu
    Gladu-Gallant, Frederick-Alexandre
    Bilodeau, Samuel Eichhorn
    MacPherson, Sarah
    Paris, Maxime
    Lefsrud, Mark
    Orsata, Valerie
    INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS, 2023, 195
  • [6] Preparative separation of bioactive compounds from essential oil of Flaveria bidentis (L.) Kuntze using steam distillation extraction and one step high-speed counter-current chromatography
    Wei, Yun
    Du, Jilin
    Lu, Yuanyuan
    JOURNAL OF SEPARATION SCIENCE, 2012, 35 (19) : 2608 - 2614