共 18 条
Institutionalisation of public participation in China's urban regeneration from the perspective of historical institutionalism: Three-stage cases in Guangzhou
被引:5
|作者:
Ye, Changdong
[1
,2
]
Chen, Weixuan
[3
,4
,5
]
Liu, Yingsheng
[1
]
He, Qiluan
[1
]
机构:
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Forestry & Landscape Architecture, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Nat Resources Monitoring Trop & Subtrop ar, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Nottingham, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[4] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Ningbo 315100, Peoples R China
[5] Univ Nottingham, Sch Sociol & Social Policy, Room B2,Sustainable Res Bldg,Univ Pk, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
基金:
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
Institutionalisation;
Public participation;
Urban regeneration;
Historical institutionalism;
China;
DECISION-MAKING;
ENNING ROAD;
REDEVELOPMENT;
GOVERNANCE;
URBANIZATION;
RENEWAL;
PROJECT;
STRATEGIES;
VILLAGE;
POLICY;
D O I:
10.1016/j.polgeo.2023.103036
中图分类号:
P9 [自然地理学];
K9 [地理];
学科分类号:
0705 ;
070501 ;
摘要:
Research into public participation in urban regeneration holds a significant position in global urban research, with a considerable body of literature describing the practices of multiple stakeholders' participation in diverse institutional contexts. In the centralised dynamic context for China's urban regeneration, the institutional arrangements and practices of public participation and the evolution processes between them still remain "black boxes". This paper aims to clarify the institutionalisation process of public participation in China's urban regeneration. Using the historical institutionalism perspective, this research adapts the institutionalisation framework proposed by Burns and Scapens (2000) to the analysis of participatory governance in China's planning context. It analyses three phases of urban regeneration in Guangzhou and provides corresponding case studies for an in-depth analysis. The findings reveal that the success of public participation in urban regeneration varies across phases, mainly due to the degree of government power sharing and the inclusion of nongovernmental actors in decision-making through genuinely participative interactions. This research develops an institutionalisation analysis framework and notes that the proposed institutionalisation path only partially applies to public participation in China's urban regeneration. The institutionalisation of public participation from the institutional realm to the realm of action in China's regeneration practices departs from hysteresis, which is the opposite of synchronisation in historical institutionalism. The root cause of this inefficient institutionalisation and its separation from practice is the imbalance in the allocation of power resources. These findings provide institutionalisation insights into the interrelationships between the evolution of policy and practices of public participation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文