Explained variation and degrees of necessity and of sufficiency for competing risks survival data

被引:0
|
作者
Gleiss, Andreas [1 ]
Gnant, Michael [2 ]
Schemper, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Inst Clin Biometr, Ctr Med Data Sci, Spitalgasse 23, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] Med Univ Vienna, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Vienna, Austria
关键词
competing risks; explained variation; Fine and Gray model; necessary condition; sufficient condition; PREDICTIVE ACCURACY; MODELS; COX;
D O I
10.1002/bimj.202300140
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In this contribution, the Schemper-Henderson measure of explained variation for survival outcomes is extended to accommodate competing events (CEs) in addition to events of interest. The extension is achieved by moving from the unconditional and conditional survival functions of the original measure to unconditional and conditional cumulative incidence functions, the latter obtained, for example, from Fine and Gray models. In the absence of CEs, the original measure is obtained as a special case. We define explained variation on the population level and provide two different types of estimates. Recently, the authors have achieved a multiplicative decomposition of explained variation into degrees of necessity and degrees of sufficiency. These measures are also extended to the case of competing risks survival data. A SAS macro and an R function are provided to facilitate application. Interesting empirical properties of the measures are explored on the population level and by an extensive simulation study. Advantages of the approach are exemplified by an Austrian study of breast cancer with a high proportion of CEs.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Competing risks in survival data analysis
    Dutz, Almut
    Loeck, Steffen
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 130 : 185 - 189
  • [2] Joint Inference for Competing Risks Survival Data
    Li, Gang
    Yang, Qing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 111 (515) : 1289 - 1300
  • [3] Quantifying degrees of necessity and of sufficiency in cause-effect relationships with dichotomous and survival outcomes
    Gleiss, Andreas
    Schemper, Michael
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2019, 38 (23) : 4733 - 4748
  • [4] A note on competing risks in survival data analysis
    J M Satagopan
    L Ben-Porat
    M Berwick
    M Robson
    D Kutler
    A D Auerbach
    [J]. British Journal of Cancer, 2004, 91 : 1229 - 1235
  • [5] A note on competing risks in survival data analysis
    Satagopan, JM
    Ben-Porat, L
    Berwick, M
    Robson, M
    Kutler, D
    Auerbach, AD
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 91 (07) : 1229 - 1235
  • [6] Simulating competing risks data in survival analysis
    Beyersmann, Jan
    Latouche, Aurelien
    Buchholz, Anika
    Schumacher, Martin
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (06) : 956 - 971
  • [7] MEASURES OF EXPLAINED VARIATION FOR SURVIVAL-DATA
    KORN, EL
    SIMON, R
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1990, 9 (05) : 487 - 503
  • [8] Adjusted curves for clustered survival and competing risks data
    Khanal, Manoj
    Kim, Soyoung
    Ahn, Kwang Woo
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION, 2023,
  • [9] Decision tree for modeling survival data with competing risks
    Dauda, Kazeem Adesina
    Pradhan, Biswabrata
    Shankar, B. Uma
    Mitra, Sushmita
    [J]. BIOCYBERNETICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 39 (03) : 697 - 708
  • [10] Introduction to the Analysis of Survival Data in the Presence of Competing Risks
    Austin, Peter C.
    Lee, Douglas S.
    Fine, Jason P.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2016, 133 (06) : 601 - 609