Selecting material handling equipment through a market weight scheme based DEA cross-efficiency approach

被引:9
|
作者
Oukil, Amar [1 ]
机构
[1] Sultan Qaboos Univ, Coll Econ & Polit Sci, Muscat 123, Oman
关键词
Material handling; market weight scheme; Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Cross-efficiency; Ordered weighted averaging (OWA); technology selection; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; RANKING; OWA; OPERATORS;
D O I
10.1080/17509653.2022.2116122
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper presents a robust tool for ranking MHE prior to selecting the best one. The proposed ranking methodology is based on a new key performance indicator, identified as market weight scheme (MWS). The MWS of each MHE reflects the market's importance of its performance criteria and it is built through an ingenious integration of the most resonated appreciative (MRA) model with the ordered weighted averaging (OWA) operator. The flexibility of MRA is exploited to customize the weight profiles of the data envelopment analysis (DEA) peer-evaluations, whereas the OWA aggregation process is run to produce the associated MWS for a pre-set decision maker's (DM) subjective judgment towards the MHE market stability. Thus, the novelty of the present study is threefold. (1) The MHE is selected from a collective market perspective rather than individualistic manufacturer's viewpoint. (2) The ranking process is based on the aggregation of weight profiles instead of cross-efficiency (CE) scores, as traditionally done in DEA-CE approaches. (3) The DM's subjectivism is integrated into the assessment process through an optimism measure that mimics the market stability. The application of the proposed methodology on a sample of 27 robots asserts its robustness as a selection tool.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Designing efficient material handling systems: a two-stage approach based on DEA cross-efficiency
    Oukil, Amar
    [J]. GOL'20: 2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON LOGISTICS OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT (GOL), 2020, : 127 - 131
  • [2] A DEA cross-efficiency approach based on bargaining theory
    Contreras, I.
    Lozano, S.
    Hinojosa, M. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2021, 72 (05) : 1156 - 1167
  • [3] Selecting symmetric weights as a secondary goal in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation
    Jahanshahloo, G. R.
    Lotfi, F. Hosseinzadeh
    Jafari, Y.
    Maddahi, R.
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (01) : 544 - 549
  • [4] DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings
    Wu, Jie
    Liang, Liang
    Chen, Yao
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 37 (04): : 909 - 918
  • [5] DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation
    Wang, Y-M
    Chin, K-S
    Wang, S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2012, 63 (08) : 1079 - 1088
  • [6] On the DEA total weight flexibility and the aggregation in cross-efficiency evaluations
    Ruiz, Jose L.
    Sirvent, Inmaculada
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2012, 223 (03) : 732 - 738
  • [7] In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA
    Lam, K. F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2010, 61 (01) : 134 - 143
  • [8] A hybrid approach for selecting material handling equipment in a warehouse
    Saputro, Thomy Eko
    Rouyendegh , Babak Daneshvar
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2016, 11 (01) : 34 - 48
  • [9] DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on Pareto improvement
    Wu, Jie
    Chu, Junfei
    Sun, Jiasen
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 248 (02) : 571 - 579
  • [10] Fixed cost and resource allocation based on DEA cross-efficiency
    Du, Juan
    Cook, Wade D.
    Liang, Liang
    Zhu, Joe
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2014, 235 (01) : 206 - 214