For whom the bell tolls: Climate change and income inequality
被引:18
|
作者:
Cevik, Serhan
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Int Monetary Fund, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431 USAInt Monetary Fund, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431 USA
Cevik, Serhan
[1
]
Jalles, Joao Tovar
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Univ Lisbon, Lisbon Sch Econ & Management ISEG, Rua Quelhas 6, P-1200781 Lisbon, Portugal
Univ Lisbon, ISEG, Res Econ & Math REM & Res Unit Complex & Econ UECE, Rua Miguel Lupi 20, P-1249078 Lisbon, Portugal
Univ Nova Lisboa, Nova Sch Business & Econ, Econ Policy, Rua Holanda 1, P-2775405 Carcavelos, Portugal
IPAG Business Sch, 184 Blvd St Germain, F-75006 Paris, FranceInt Monetary Fund, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431 USA
Jalles, Joao Tovar
[2
,3
,4
,5
]
机构:
[1] Int Monetary Fund, 700 19th St NW, Washington, DC 20431 USA
Climate change is the defining challenge of our time with complex and evolving dynamics. The effects of climate change on economic output and financial stability have received considerable attention, but there has been much less focus on the relationship between climate change and income inequality. In this paper, we provide new evidence on the association between climate change and income inequality, using a large panel of 158 countries during the period 1995-2019. We find that an increase in climate change vulnerability is positively associated with rising income inequality. More interestingly, splitting the sample into country groups reveals a considerable contrast in the impact of climate change on income inequality. While climate change vulnerability has no sta-tistically significant effect on income distribution in advanced economies, the coefficient on climate change vulnerability is seven times greater and statistically highly significant in the case of developing countries due largely to weaker capacity for climate change adaptation and mitigation. These findings are robust with alter-native estimation methods and measures of income inequality, but it should be noted that the appropriate measurement of climate change vulnerability and resilience remains a challenge that imposes limits on empirical analysis.