Evaluation of intermittent antimicrobial infusion documentation practices in intensive care units: A cross-sectional study

被引:2
|
作者
Rout, Joan Allison [1 ]
Essack, Sabiha Yusuf [2 ]
Brysiewicz, Petra [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Coll Hlth Sci, Sch Nursing & Publ Hlth, Durban, South Africa
[2] Univ KwaZulu Natal, Coll Hlth Sci, Antimicrobial Res Unit, Durban, South Africa
关键词
Antimicrobial stewardship; Carbapenems; Drug resistance; Intensive care units; Medication errors; Patient safety; MEDICATION ADMINISTRATION ERRORS; DOUBLE CHECKING; STEWARDSHIP; GUIDELINES; FREQUENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.iccn.2023.103527
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: To observe nurse administration of carbapenem antibiotics, in the context of medication safety measures, in intensive care units.Research Methodology/Design: A quantitative study was conducted using observation principles.Setting: Three adult private and public Intensive Care Units in the health district of a capital city in KwaZuluNatal, South Africa.Main Outcome Measures: Nurse practices were observed for double-checking of the medication order, medication vial, and method of preparation and administration. Infusion bags were inspected for nurse labelling of medication and patient details. Patient medication treatment charts were inspected for nurse signature. Results: Carbapenem infusion administrations (n = 223) to twenty patients were observed. Adherence to the scheduled time occurred in 34.9% administrations, 5.4% doses were not given, and an incorrect dose given on 1.4% administrations. One hundred and forty-four (64.6%) infusion bags were inspected during the administrations: there was no medication label affixed to 21.5% bags, and only 8.3% of bags were labelled with essential details; the patient's name, drug, dose, date, time, signature of the nurse mixing and administering the dose, and signature of the secondary nurse.Conclusion: There was a lack of compliance with accepted medication risk mitigation measures. Sub-optimal double-checking resulted in the incorrect dose given, missed dose, and non-adherence to scheduled administration time. This has implications for the optimal administration of antimicrobial medications, raising concerns about the efficacy of treatment for critically ill patients. Implications for Clinical Practice: Parenteral administration errors pose a challenge in acute care areas. Risk mitigation measures include double-checking of medications. If antimicrobial treatment is not administered at the prescribed dosing intervals, this may have implications for the efficacy of time-dependent broad-spectrum antibiotics such as carbapenems. Medication administration errors involving antimicrobial medications should therefore be considered as high-risk errors, with the potential to contribute towards antimicrobial resistance.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mechanical ventilation practices in Asian intensive care units: A multicenter cross-sectional study
    Nam, Kyung Hun
    Phua, Jason
    Du, Bin
    Ohshimo, Shinichiro
    Kim, Hwa Jung
    Lim, Chae-Man
    Myatra, Sheila Nainan
    Adib, Nik Azman Bin Nik
    Arabi, Yaseen M.
    Chan, Ming-Cheng
    Faruq, Mohammad Omar
    Redjeki, Ike Sri
    Son, Do Ngoc
    Nafees, Khalid Mahmood Khan
    Priyankara, Dilshan
    Patjanasoontorn, Boonsong
    Palo, Jose Emmanuel
    Konkayev, Aidos
    Shrestha, Gentle Sunder
    Koh, Younsuck
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 79
  • [2] Practices of the ABCDEF care bundle in intensive care units as reported by nurses: A cross-sectional study from Turkey
    Dalli, Oznur Erbay
    Dogan, Derya Akca
    Bayram, Ridvan
    Pehlivan, Seda
    Yildiz, Hicran
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 29 (05) : 974 - 986
  • [3] Early mobilisation practices of patients in intensive care units in Zimbabwean government hospitals - a cross-sectional study
    Tadyanemhandu, C.
    van Aswegen, H.
    Ntsiea, V.
    SOUTHERN AFRICAN JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2018, 34 (01) : 16 - 21
  • [4] Nursing workload in neurological intensive care units: Cross-sectional study
    Queijo, Alda Ferreira
    Martins, Renata Soares
    Andolhe, Rafaela
    Oliveira, Elaine Machado
    Barbosa, Ricardo Luis
    Padilha, Katia Grillo
    INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2013, 29 (02) : 112 - 116
  • [5] Dysphagia in the Intensive Care Units in Turkey: A Cross-sectional Survey Study
    Arslan, Selen Serel
    Demir, Numan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE-TURK YOGUN BAKIM DERGISI, 2022, 20 (03): : 154 - 160
  • [6] Ventilation Practices in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Cross-Sectional Study
    van Kaam, Anton H.
    Rimensberger, Peter C.
    Borensztajn, Dorine
    De Jaegere, Anne P.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2010, 157 (05): : 767 - U101
  • [7] Management of early mobilization in intensive care units:a multicenter cross-sectional study
    Yan-Ping Zhu
    Li-Xia Xia
    Guo-Hong Li
    FrontiersofNursing, 2018, 5 (04) : 291 - 299
  • [8] Parental satisfaction with neonatal intensive care units: a quantitative cross-sectional study
    Inger Hilde Hagen
    Valentina Cabral Iversen
    Erik Nesset
    Roderick Orner
    Marit Følsvik Svindseth
    BMC Health Services Research, 19
  • [9] Core competencies for nurses in Chinese intensive care units: a cross-sectional study
    Wei, Wanrui
    Niu, Yunchao
    Ge, Xiaohua
    NURSING IN CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 24 (05) : 276 - 282
  • [10] Dissemination of patient blood management practices in Swiss intensive care units: a cross-sectional survey
    Previsdomini, Marco
    Colombo, Jacopo
    Cerutti, Bernard
    Gerber, Bernhard
    Hofmann, Axel
    Chiesa, Alessandro F.
    Saporito, Andrea
    La Regina, Davide
    Cafarotti, Stefano
    Patella, Miriam
    Perren, Andreas
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2022, 152