Initiating luteal phase support with sc progesterone based on low serum progesterone on the transfer day in true natural cycle frozen embryo transfers

被引:0
|
作者
Demirel, Cem [1 ]
Ozcan, Pinar [2 ]
Tulek, Firat [1 ]
Timur, Hikmet Tunc [3 ]
Pasin, Oezge [4 ]
机构
[1] Acibadem Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Istanbul, Turkiye
[2] Bezmialem Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
[3] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Izmir, Turkiye
[4] Bezmialem Univ, Dept Biostat & Med Informat, Sch Med, Istanbul, Turkiye
来源
关键词
luteal phase support; in-vitro fertilisation; progesterone; frozen embryo transfer; natural cycle; ARTIFICIAL ENDOMETRIAL PREPARATION; PREGNANCY RATE; OVULATION;
D O I
10.3389/fendo.2023.1278042
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Concerning contemporary in-vitro fertilisation (IVF) practice, the use of frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles has become more common than fresh transfers. Natural cycle (NC), programmed artificial cycle and mild stimulation cycle are primary endometrium preparation cycles. Monitoring serum progesterone levels in FET cycles are in the scope of current research focus. Low progesterone levels on the day of embryo transfer is presumed to negatively affect pregnancy outcomes, while progesterone supplementation may improve pregnancy rates. The purpose of our trial is to evaluate whether initiating subcutaneous (SC) progesterone supplementation on the day of embryo transfer when serum progesterone levels are below 10 ng/mL in tNC-FET will result in pregnancy rates comparable to those of patients with sufficient serum progesterone.Methods: Retrospective single centre study was conducted between August 2022 and April 2023 with 181 tNC-FETs. Patients were separated into groups according to serum progesterone concentrations (>= 10 ng/mL and <10 ng/mL) on embryo transfer (ET) day. S.c progesterone (25 mg) was given on the day of ET when serum progesterone was <10 ng/mL, continuing until the 10th gestational week. Blood samples for pregnancy tests were collected 12 days after ET. Outcome parameters were pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, biochemical pregnancy, and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR).Results: About half (49.7%) had adequate progesterone concentrations (>= 10ng/mL) on ET day. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding positive pregnancy test, OPR, multiple pregnancies, and miscarriage rates (57.8% versus 52.7%; 34.4% versus 29.7%, 1.1% versus 2.2%; 7.8% versus 5.5%; respectively, for progesterone concentrations on ET day >= 10 ng/mL and <10 ng/mL). With 55.2% of transfers leading to clinical pregnancy, significant differences emerged in biochemical pregnancy and CPR (3.3% vs 12.1%, P=0.02; 54.4% vs 40.7%, P=0.03, for >= 10 ng/mL and <10 ng/mL progesterone concentrations on ET day).Discussion: This study indicates that nearly half of the tNC-FETs may need luteal phase support due to low progesterone. However, 25 mc sc progesterone rescued the luteal support and yielded similar OPR as compared to normal progesterone group. Further studies are needed for understanding optimal progesterone levels, supplementation effectiveness, and potential benefits of earlier supplementation in FETs.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Are systemic progesterone levels in true natural cycle euploid frozen embryo transfers with luteal phase support predictive for ongoing pregnancy rates?
    Lawrenz, B.
    Ata, B.
    Kalafat, E.
    Melado, L.
    ElKhatib, I
    Del Gallego, R.
    Fatemi, H.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2023, 38 (07) : 1318 - 1324
  • [2] The impact of luteal phase support on pregnancy outcomes in relation to serum progesterone levels on the day of frozen embryo transfer in natural cycles
    Roelens, C.
    Pais, F.
    Mackens, S.
    Van Landuyt, L.
    De Vos, M.
    Tournaye, H.
    Drakopoulos, P.
    Blockeel, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I503 - I504
  • [3] A randomized controlled trial of vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in modified natural cycle - frozen embryo transfer
    Horowitz, Eran
    Mizrachi, Yossi
    Finkelstein, Maya
    Farhi, Jacob
    Shalev, Amir
    Gold, Eran
    Raziel, Arieh
    Weissman, Ariel
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (09) : 792 - 797
  • [4] LUTEAL PHASE PROGESTERONE SUPPORT DOES NOT IMPROVE ONGOING PREGNANCIES IN TRUE NATURAL CYCLE CRYOPRESERVED BLASTOCYST EMBRYO TRANSFERS.
    Waldman, Ian
    Racowsky, Catherine
    Disler, Emily
    Thomas, Ann M.
    Lanes, Andrea
    Hornstein, Mark D.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (03) : E188 - E188
  • [5] Luteal phase support for frozen embryo transfer cycles: intramuscular or vaginal progesterone?
    Casper, Robert F.
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2014, 101 (03) : 627 - 628
  • [6] Circadian serum progesterone variations on the day of frozen embryo transfer in a modified natural cycle protocol
    Loreti, S.
    Roelens, C.
    Aktoz, F.
    Niero, M.
    De Munck, N.
    Tournaye, H.
    Mackens, S.
    Blockeel, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 (07) : 1512 - 1518
  • [7] Circadian serum progesterone variations on the day of frozen embryo transfer in a modified natural cycle protocol
    Loreti, S.
    Roelens, C.
    Aktoz, F.
    Niero, M.
    De Munck, N.
    Tournaye, H.
    Mackens, S.
    Blockeel, C.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 : I462 - I462
  • [8] The clinical relevance of luteal phase progesterone support in true natural cycle cryopreserved blastocyst stage embryo transfers: a retrospective cohort study
    Ian N. Waldman
    Catherine Racowsky
    Emily R. Disler
    Ann Thomas
    Andrea Lanes
    Mark D. Hornstein
    [J]. Fertility Research and Practice, 7 (1)
  • [9] Optimal route of progesterone administration for luteal phase support in frozen embryo transfer cycle : systematic review
    Almohammadi, A.
    Black, M.
    Maheshwari, A.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2022, 37 : I484 - I484
  • [10] Clinical relevance of serum progesterone level on the day before frozen embryo transfer when using a combined luteal phase support
    Seixas, N. Ramos
    Pirtea, P.
    Benammar, A.
    De Ziegler, D.
    Frydman, R.
    Poulain, M.
    Ayoubi, J. M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2020, 35 : 1430 - 1431