Comparison of Aseptic Partial- and Full-Component Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Shichman, Ittai [1 ,2 ]
Oakley, Christian T. [1 ]
Thomas, Jeremiah [1 ]
Rozell, Joshua C. [1 ]
Aggarwal, Vinay K. [1 ]
Schwarzkopf, Ran [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU Langone Hlth, Dept Orthoped Surg, New York, NY USA
[2] Tel Aviv Univ, Sackler Sch Med, Sourasky Med Ctr, Div Orthoped Surg, Tel Aviv, Israel
来源
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY | 2023年 / 38卷 / 07期
关键词
revision; TKA; partial; full; component; implants; survivorship; ISOLATED TIBIAL COMPONENT; INSERT EXCHANGE; FAILURE; REGISTER; OUTCOMES; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2022.09.025
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) can be performed with isolated tibial, isolated femoral, and combined tibial and femoral component exchange for different indications. Replacement of only 1 fixed component in rTKA leads to shorter operative times and decreased complexity. We sought to compare functional outcomes and rates of rerevision in patients undergoing partial and full rTKA. Methods: This retrospective study examined all aseptic rTKA patients with a minimum follow-up of 2 years in a single center between September 2011 and December 2019. Patients were divided into two groups: full rTKA (F-rTKA) if both components (femoral and tibial) were revised and partial rTKA (PrTKA) if only 1 component was revised. A total of 293 patients (P-rTKA = 76, F-rTKA = 217) were included. Results: P-rTKA patients had significantly shorter surgical time (109 +/- 37 Versus. 141 +/- 44 minutes, P <.001). At mean follow-up of 4.2 (range 2.2-6.2) years, rerevision rates did not significantly differ between groups (11.8 Versus. 16.1%, P = .358). Improvements in postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Scale (KOOS), Joint Replacement scores were similar as well (P = .100 and P = .140, respectively). For patients undergoing rTKA due to aseptic loosening, freedom from rerevision due to aseptic loosening was similar between groups (100 Versus. 97.8%, P = .321). For patients undergoing rTKA due to instability, freedom from rerevision due to instability did not significantly differ as well (100 Versus. 98.1%, P = .683). In the P-rTKA cohort, freedom from all-cause and aseptic revision of preserved components was 96.1% and 98.7% at the 2-year follow-up. Conclusion: Compared to F-rTKA, P-rTKA yielded similar functional outcomes and implant survivorship with shorter surgical time. When indications and component compatibility allow for such a procedure, surgeons can expect good outcomes when performing P-rTKA. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:S360 / S368
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Isolated Versus Full Component Revision in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening
    Apinyankul, Rit
    Hwang, Katherine
    Segovia, Nicole Alexandriadria
    Amanatullah, Derek F.
    Huddleston, James I.
    Maloney, William J.
    Goodman, Stuart B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2023, 38 (02): : 335 - 340
  • [2] Modern full-component aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties have similar recoveries compared with primary total knee arthroplasty patients when applying an enhanced recovery anaesthetic and analgesic protocol
    Costales, T.
    Chapman, D. M.
    Miller, M. J.
    Dalury, D. F.
    [J]. BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2020, 102B (06): : 96 - 100
  • [3] REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY FOR ASEPTIC FAILURE
    JACOBS, MA
    HUNGERFORD, DS
    KRACKOW, KA
    LENNOX, DW
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1988, (226) : 78 - 85
  • [4] Comparison of the clinical and radiological outcomes between an isolated tibial component revision and total revision knee arthroplasty in aseptic loosening of an isolated tibial component
    Lee, Sung-Sahn
    Park, Jun-Seok
    Lee, Young Keun
    Moon, Young-Wan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE, 2021, 26 (03) : 435 - 440
  • [5] Risk Factors for Total Knee Arthroplasty Aseptic Revision
    Namba, Robert S.
    Cafri, Guy
    Khatod, Monti
    Inacio, Maria C. S.
    Brox, Timothy W.
    Paxton, Elizabeth W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (08): : 122 - 127
  • [6] Revision total knee arthroplasty for septic versus aseptic failure
    Razii, Nima
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2014, 22 (01) : 134 - 134
  • [7] Revision total knee arthroplasty for septic versus aseptic failure
    Rajgopal, Ashok
    Vasdev, Attique
    Gupta, Himanshu
    Dahiya, Vivek
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (03) : 285 - 289
  • [8] RESULTS OF REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY PERFORMED FOR ASEPTIC LOOSENING
    FRIEDMAN, RJ
    HIRST, P
    POSS, R
    KELLEY, K
    SLEDGE, CB
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 1990, (255) : 235 - 241
  • [9] Intraoperative Fracture During Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Sassoon, Adam A.
    Wyles, Cody C.
    Morales, German A. Norambuena
    Houdek, Matthew T.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (11): : 2187 - 2191
  • [10] STEMMED REVISION ARTHROPLASTY FOR ASEPTIC LOOSENING OF TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT
    BERTIN, KC
    FREEMAN, MAR
    SAMUELSON, KM
    RATCLIFFE, SS
    TODD, RC
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1985, 67 (02): : 242 - 248