Feasibility of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) as a standard treatment for distal resectable pancreatic cancer

被引:7
|
作者
Sato, Shoki [1 ]
Oba, Atsushi [1 ]
Kato, Tomotaka [1 ]
Kobayashi, Kosuke [1 ]
Wu, Y. H. Andrew [2 ]
Ono, Yoshihiro [1 ]
Sato, Takafumi [1 ]
Ito, Hiromichi [1 ]
Inoue, Yosuke [1 ]
Takahashi, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Div Hepatobiliary & Pancreat Surg, 3-8-31 Ariake,Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy; Laparoscopic surgery; Adjuvant chemotherapy; INTERNATIONAL STUDY-GROUP; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; OPEN-LABEL; ADENOCARCINOMA; GEMCITABINE; DEFINITION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY; PHASE-3; BODY;
D O I
10.1007/s00423-023-02942-0
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionLaparoscopic (Lap-) radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) is an attractive radical procedure that aims to achieve negative posterior retroperitoneal margin in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) resections. However, only few institutions are adapting Lap-RAMPS due to the technical difficulties and the lack of supporting evidence for the clinical applications.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent RAMPS for distal resectable PDACs. We analyzed the short- and long-term outcomes including local control and the induction of adjuvant chemotherapy compared between Lap- and Open-RAMPS.ResultsOf the 118 RAMPS patients, 43 patients underwent Lap-RAMPS and 75 patients underwent Open-RAMPS. The blood loss was lower (125 vs. 390 mL, p < 0.001), and postoperative hospital stay was shorter (17 vs. 21 days, p = 0.018) in the Lap-RAMPS group. There was no difference in the postoperative complications and no mortality in both groups. R0 resection rate was 100.0% in the Lap-RAMPS and 90.7% in the Open-RAMPS (p = 0.039). Among the patients eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy, the Lap-RAMPS group showed a favorable induction rate (100.0 vs. 89.6%, p = 0.037). Both groups showed a favorable 3-year local recurrence rate (8.7 vs. 10.0%, p = 0.976) and 3-year overall survival (69.8 vs. 71.1%, p = 0.996).ConclusionsThe safety and efficacy of Lap-RAMPS were comparable to those of Open-RAMPS in terms of achieving local control and adjuvant chemotherapy induction. A higher early induction of adjuvant chemotherapy is an advantage of minimally invasive surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Feasibility of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) as a standard treatment for distal resectable pancreatic cancer
    Shoki Sato
    Atsushi Oba
    Tomotaka Kato
    Kosuke Kobayashi
    Y.H. Andrew Wu
    Yoshihiro Ono
    Takafumi Sato
    Hiromichi Ito
    Yosuke Inoue
    Yu Takahashi
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408
  • [2] LAPAROSCOPIC DISTAL PANCREATECTOMY BY RADICAL ANTEGRADE MODULAR PANCREATOSPLENECTOMY (RAMPS)
    Zamorano, Alicia Gutierrez
    Valencia, Paula Spang
    Porrazzo, Gina
    Shaker, Andrew
    Stauffer, John
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2023, 164 (06) : S1462 - S1462
  • [3] Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer
    Chun, Yun Shin
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 25 (01) : 46 - 50
  • [4] Role of Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and Pancreatic Cancer
    Yun Shin Chun
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2018, 25 : 46 - 50
  • [5] Laparoscopic Posterior Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy for Distal Pancreatic Carcinoma
    Liang, Junjie
    Jiang, Quan
    Xiang, Leyang
    Jiang, Yuchuan
    Li, Jiexing
    Liu, Zhilong
    Li, Qiang
    Cao, Mingrong
    Hu, Youzhu
    Sun, Jian
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2023, (202):
  • [6] Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) for cystadenocarcinoma of the pancreas
    Fonollosa, Eric Herrero
    Galofre-Recasens, Maria
    Garcia-Domingo, Maria Isabel
    Lasa, Judith Camps
    Andorra, Esteban Cugat
    CIRUGIA ESPANOLA, 2023, 101 (09): : 613 - 614
  • [7] Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy versus standard distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic cancer, a dual-institutional analysis
    Sham, Jonathan G.
    Guo, Shiwei
    Ding, Ding
    Shao, Zhuo
    Wright, Michael
    Jing, Wei
    Yin, Ling-Di
    Zhang, Yijie
    Gage, Michele M.
    Zhou, Yingqi
    Javed, Ammar
    Burkhart, Richard A.
    Zhou, Xuyu
    Weiss, Matthew J.
    He, Tianlin
    Li, Gang
    Cameron, John L.
    Hu, Xiangui
    Wolfgang, Christopher L.
    Jin, Gang
    He, Jin
    CHINESE CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9 (04)
  • [8] Comparison of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy with standard pancreatosplenectomy for left sided pancreatic cancer
    Tarrar, Talha Azam
    Iqbal, Hafiz Muhammad Nuheel
    Sonoo, Prithvirao
    Karamat, Syed Taimur
    Khawaja, Amir
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2024, 111
  • [9] Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Menghua Dai
    Hanyu Zhang
    Yatong Li
    Cheng Xing
    Cheng Ding
    Quan Liao
    Taiping Zhang
    Junchao Guo
    Qiang Xu
    Xianlin Han
    Wenjing Liu
    Qiaofei Liu
    Surgery Today, 2021, 51 : 1126 - 1134
  • [10] Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) versus conventional distal pancreatosplenectomy (CDPS) for left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    Dai, Menghua
    Zhang, Hanyu
    Li, Yatong
    Xing, Cheng
    Ding, Cheng
    Liao, Quan
    Zhang, Taiping
    Guo, Junchao
    Xu, Qiang
    Han, Xianlin
    Liu, Wenjing
    Liu, Qiaofei
    SURGERY TODAY, 2021, 51 (07) : 1126 - 1134