On enterprise coherence governance with GEA: a 15-year co-evolution of practice and theory

被引:0
|
作者
Proper, Henderik A. [1 ,2 ]
Wagter, Roel [3 ]
Bekel, Joost [4 ]
机构
[1] Luxembourg Inst Sci & Technol LIST, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
[2] TU Wien, Vienna, Austria
[3] Solventa BV, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Maastricht, Netherlands
来源
SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING | 2023年 / 22卷 / 02期
关键词
Enterprise architecture; SCIENCE RESEARCH; DESIGN SCIENCE; ARCHITECTURE; FRAMEWORK; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s10270-022-01059-0
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
General Enterprise Architecting (GEA) is an enterprise architecture method which has emerged out of a need in practice, and has been developed and matured over the past 15 years. The GEA method differs from other enterprise architecture approaches in that it has a strong focus on enterprise coherence and the explicit governance thereof. This focus followed from the observed need to move beyond the Business-IT alignment and 'Business-to-IT' stack thinking that is embodied in most of the existing enterprise architecture approaches. The main objective of this paper is to report, and reflect on, the development of the GEA method (so-far), which involved a co-evolution between theory and practice. In doing so, we also present core elements of (the current version of) GEA, and illustrate these in terms of a real-world (social housing) case. We will, furthermore, also discuss some of the lessons learned in applying GEA across different organizations.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 571
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On enterprise coherence governance with GEA: a 15-year co-evolution of practice and theory
    Henderik A. Proper
    Roel Wagter
    Joost Bekel
    [J]. Software and Systems Modeling, 2023, 22 : 551 - 571
  • [2] Enterprise Coherence with GEA - A 15 year Co-evolution of Practice and Theory
    Proper, Henderik A.
    Wagter, Roel
    Bekel, Joost
    [J]. PRACTICE OF ENTERPRISE MODELING, POEM 2021, 2021, 432 : 3 - 18
  • [3] Analysis of Interaction and Co-evolution between Enterprise and Environment-A Perspective of Theory of Co-Evolution
    Wen, Xingqi
    Ye, Rui
    Liu, Yuebin
    [J]. 2010 CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT IN CHINA, 2010, : 15 - +
  • [4] Ambidexterity and co-evolution in operations: Integrating theory and practice
    Paiva, Ely Laureano
    [J]. RAE-REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO DE EMPRESAS, 2019, 59 (02): : 144 - 148
  • [5] Co-evolution of politics and corporate governance
    Belloc, Marianna
    Pagano, Ugo
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF LAW AND ECONOMICS, 2009, 29 (02) : 106 - 114
  • [6] MODELLING CO-EVOLUTION IN DESIGN PRACTICE
    Smolders, Frido E.
    Reymen, Isabelle M.
    Dorst, Kees
    [J]. ICED 09 - THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING DESIGN, VOL 2: DESIGN THEORY AND RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, : 335 - +
  • [7] Why Governance Is Never Perfect: Co-Evolution in Environmental Policy and Governance
    Van Assche, Kristof
    Gruezmacher, Monica
    Beunen, Raoul
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (15)
  • [8] CO-EVOLUTION THEORY OF GENETIC CODE
    WONG, JTF
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1975, 72 (05) : 1909 - 1912
  • [9] 15-year evolution of liver transplantation in Europe
    Adam, Rene
    Karam, Vincen H.
    Buckels, John
    O'Grady, John
    Castaing, Denis
    Klempnauer, Jurgen
    Jamieson, Neville
    Neuhaus, Peter
    Lerut, Jan
    Pollard, Stephen
    Salizzoni, Mauro
    Fischer, Lutz
    Garcia-Valdecasas, Juan
    Muehlbacher, Ferdinand
    Mir, Jose
    Bro-elsch, Christopher
    Burra, Patrizia
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 21 : 4 - 4
  • [10] The evolution of stroke in Quebec -: A 15-year perspective
    Mayo, Nancy E.
    Nadeau, Lyne
    Daskalopoulou, Stella S.
    Cote, Robert
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (14) : 1122 - 1127