We Must Abandon the Myth: Oxidized Low-density Lipoprotein is not a Lipoprotein that Plays a Key Role in Atherogenesis

被引:1
|
作者
Orekhov, Alexander N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Gen Pathol & Pathophysiol, Moscow, Russia
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Atherogenesis; autoantibodies against LDL; desialylated LDL; electronegative LDL; malondialdehyde treated LDL; multiple-modified LDL; oxidized LDL; small dense LDL; INTRACELLULAR LIPID-ACCUMULATION; IN-VIVO; DESIALYLATED LIPOPROTEIN; SCAVENGER RECEPTOR; PLASMA; ATHEROSCLEROSIS; INFLAMMATION; OXIDATION; BLOOD; CELLS;
D O I
10.2174/0109298673301236240311113807
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The purpose of this review is to revisit in detail the arguments supporting or disproving the hypothesis that oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) plays a key role in atherosclerotic lesion development. The detection of oxidized LDL in vivo was extremely important for confirming its key role in atherogenesis. Indirect evidence of its existence included the presence of autoantibodies against malondialdehyde-treated LDL in human blood; however, the affinity of circulating antibodies to another LDL modification, such as desialylated LDL, was an order of magnitude stronger. At least 3 forms of atherogenic modified lipoproteins were isolated from the blood of atherosclerotic patients using different methods, namely, small dense, electronegative and desialylated. Their properties were so similar that it was suggested that the three types could be classified as the same multiple-modified LDL particle. It has been shown that when native (unmodified) LDL is incubated with autologous serum from patients with atherosclerosis, multiple modifications occur, which include desialylation, a decrease in the content of phospholipids and neutral lipids, a decrease in particle size, an increase in negative charge and other physical and chemical changes. Longer incubation also increased the susceptibility of LDL to oxidation. Thus, LDL oxidation is not the only, much less the most important, form of atherogenic modification of LDL since it occurs at the last stages of multiple modifications cascade and does not significantly increase the atherogenic potential of multiple-modified LDL. Finally, clinical trials did not support the oxidative hypothesis; however, research on oxidized LDL continues, influencing the future research. It is time to abandon the myth!
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] OXIDIZED LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN DOES NOT PLAY KEY ROLE IN ATHEROGENESIS
    Orekhov, Alexander
    ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2024, 399
  • [2] The role of oxidized low density lipoprotein in atherogenesis
    Jialal, I
    Devaraj, S
    JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 1996, 126 (04): : S1053 - S1057
  • [3] Is Oxidized Low-Density Lipoprotein a Principal Actor in Atherogenesis?
    Orekhov, Alexander
    Sukhorukov, Vasily
    Melnichenko, Alexandra
    CURRENT MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 2024, 31 (42) : 6909 - 6910
  • [4] ROLE OF OXIDIZED LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN IN ATHEROGENESIS
    WITZTUM, JL
    STEINBERG, D
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1991, 88 (06): : 1785 - 1792
  • [5] ROLE OF OXIDIZED LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN IN ATHEROGENESIS
    PARTHASARATHY, S
    RANKIN, SM
    PROGRESS IN LIPID RESEARCH, 1992, 31 (02) : 127 - 143
  • [6] ROLE OF OXIDIZED LOW-DENSITY-LIPOPROTEIN IN ATHEROGENESIS
    WITZTUM, JL
    BRITISH HEART JOURNAL, 1993, 69 (01): : S12 - S18
  • [7] LOW-DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN AND ATHEROGENESIS
    MENDELSOHN, ME
    LOSCALZO, J
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (17): : 1196 - 1196
  • [8] Rethinking oxidized low-density lipoprotein, its role in atherogenesis and the immune responses associated with it
    Shaw, PX
    ARCHIVUM IMMUNOLOGIAE ET THERAPIAE EXPERIMENTALIS, 2004, 52 (04) : 225 - 239
  • [9] Role of oxidized low-density lipoprotein in the atherosclerosis of uremia
    Drüeke, TB
    Khoa, TN
    Massy, ZA
    Witko-Sarsat, V
    Lacour, B
    Descamps-Latscha, B
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 59 : S114 - S119
  • [10] Role of oxidized low-density lipoprotein in renal disease
    Heeringa, P
    Tervaert, JWC
    CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2002, 11 (03): : 287 - 293