Taylor Polynomial Enhancer using Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression

被引:1
|
作者
Chang, Chi-Hsien [1 ]
Chiang, Tu-Chin [1 ]
Hsu, Tzu-Hao [1 ]
Chuang, Ting-Shuo [1 ]
Fang, Wen-Zhong [1 ]
Yu, Tian-Li [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Taiwan Evolutionary Intelligence LAB, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Genetic programming; Symbolic regression; Taylor polynomial;
D O I
10.1145/3583133.3590591
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Unlike most research of symbolic regression with genetic programming (GP) concerning black-box optimization, this paper focuses on the scenario where the underlying function is available, but due to limited computational resources or product imperfection, the function needs to be approximated with simplicity to fit measured data. Taylor polynomial (TP) is commonly used in such scenario; however, its performance drops drastically away from the expansion point. On the other hand, solely using GP does not utilize the knowledge of the underlying function, even though possibly inaccurate. This paper proposes using GP as a TP enhancer, namely TPE-GP, to combine the advantages from TP and GP. Specifically, TPE-GP utilizes infinite-order operators to compensate the power of TP with finite order. Empirically, on functions that are expressible by TP, TP outperformed both gplearn and TPE-GP as expected, while TPE-GP outperformed gplearn due to the use of TP. On functions that are not expressible by TP but expressible by the function set (FS), TPE-GP was competitive with gplearn while both outperformed TP. Finally, on functions that are not expressible by both TP and FS, TPE-GP outperformed both TP and gplearn, indicating the hybrid did achieve the synergy effect from TP and GP.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 546
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Taylor Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    He, Baihe
    Lu, Qiang
    Yang, Qingyun
    Luo, Jake
    Wang, Zhiguang
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE (GECCO'22), 2022, : 946 - 954
  • [2] Sequential Symbolic Regression with Genetic Programming
    Oliveira, Luiz Otavio V. B.
    Otero, Fernando E. B.
    Pappa, Gisele L.
    Albinati, Julio
    [J]. GENETIC PROGRAMMING THEORY AND PRACTICE XII, 2015, : 73 - 90
  • [3] Compositional Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    Kossinski, Dominik
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 570 - 573
  • [4] Symbolic regression via genetic programming
    Augusto, DA
    Barbosa, HJC
    [J]. SIXTH BRAZILIAN SYMPOSIUM ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOL 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2000, : 173 - 178
  • [5] Statistical genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Haeri, Maryam Amir
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Folino, Gianluigi
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 447 - 469
  • [6] On improving genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Gustafson, S
    Burke, EK
    Krasnogor, N
    [J]. 2005 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-3, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, : 912 - 919
  • [7] Symbolic regression of crop pest forecasting using genetic programming
    Alhadidi, Basim
    Al-Afeef, Alaa
    Al-Hiary, Heba
    [J]. TURKISH JOURNAL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2012, 20 : 1332 - 1342
  • [8] Transformation of CPS coordinates using symbolic regression and genetic programming
    Chou, HJ
    Wu, CH
    Su, WH
    [J]. Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence for Measurement Systems and Applications, 2005, : 301 - 306
  • [9] Lifetime Adaptation in Genetic Programming for the Symbolic Regression
    Merta, Jan
    Brandejsky, Tomas
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING METHODS IN INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, VOL. 2, 2019, 1047 : 339 - 346
  • [10] Multifactorial Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression Problems
    Zhong, Jinghui
    Feng, Liang
    Cai, Wentong
    Ong, Yew-Soon
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN CYBERNETICS-SYSTEMS, 2020, 50 (11): : 4492 - 4505