A Systematic Review of Live Animal Use as a Simulation Modality ("Live Tissue Training") in the Emergency Management of Trauma

被引:3
|
作者
Swain, C. S. [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Cohen, H. M. L. [3 ]
Helgesson, G. [1 ]
Rickard, R. F. [2 ]
Karlgren, K. [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Royal Ctr Def Med RCDM Birmingham, Acad Dept Mil Surg & Trauma, Birmingham, England
[3] HQ Army Med Serv Support Unit, Camberley, England
[4] Soder Sjukhuset, Dept Res Educ Dev & Innovat, Stockholm, Sweden
[5] Western Norway Univ Appl Sci, Fac Hlth & Social Sci, Bergen, Norway
[6] Dept Learning Informat Management & Eth LIME, Tomtebodavagen 18A, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Simulation; Trauma; Surgery; Critical care; Live tissue training; COMBAT CASUALTY CARE; SURGERY; MODELS; HEMORRHAGE; EXPERIENCE; PROGRAM; CONFIDENCE; CHALLENGES; READINESS; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsurg.2023.06.018
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: Live anaesthetized animals are used as simulation models to teach techniques in the emergency management of trauma. We aimed to explore how "live tissue training" (LTT) is designed, delivered and evalu-ated in order to better understand and characterize aspects of educational merit.METHODS: A systematic review was performed using PRISMA guidance. A combined approach, involving a 3 -stage modified narrative synthesis process and reflexive thematic analysis was used to identify key concepts across the published literature.FINDINGS: Qualitative synthesis of 48 selected articles suggests that LTT is mainly used to teach military and civilian physicians and military medical technicians. The procedures trained vary with the learner population, from simple pre-hospital trauma tasks to advanced oper-ative surgical skills. Many courses use a combination of didactic and practical training, with an animal model used to train practical application of knowledge and pro-cedural skills. Descriptions of the learning interventions are limited, and explicit use of educational theory or pedagogic frameworks were absent within the litera-ture. Four themes were identified regarding aspects of LTT that are valued by learners: "recreating the experi-ence," relating to fidelity and realism; "tick tock" "dynamics of hemorrhage", encompassing the impact of bleeding and urgent pressure to act; "emotional impact" of conducting the training, and "self-efficacy: I believe I can do it."CONCLUSION: Thematic analysis of published litera-ture suggests that there may be educational benefit in the use of live tissue models due to time criticality and bleeding, which creates a real-life event. LTT also invokes an emotional response, and learners experi-ence an increase in self-efficacy from participation. We consider that these aspects and associated pedagogy should be addressed when researching and developing alternative simulation modalities, in order to intelli-gently replace, reduce and refine the use of animals in training practitioners in the emergency management of trauma. ( J Surg Ed 80:1320-1339. Crown Copyright & COPY; 2023 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association of Program Directors in Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/))
引用
收藏
页码:1320 / 1339
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CURRENT USE OF LIVE TISSUE TRAINING IN TRAUMA: A DESCRIPTIVE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW - AUTHOR RESPONSE
    da Luz, Luis Teodoro
    Nascimento, Bartolomeu, Jr.
    Tien, Homer
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 58 (06) : E6 - E7
  • [2] Live tissue versus simulation training for emergency procedures: Is simulation ready to replace live tissue?
    Zielinski, Martin
    Barnes, Stephen
    Carty, Sally
    Barnes, Stephen
    [J]. SURGERY, 2016, 160 (04) : 1006 - 1007
  • [3] Comment on: Live tissue versus simulation training for emergency procedures: Is simulation ready to replace live tissue?
    Crandall, Marie
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (05) : 1463 - 1464
  • [4] Systematic Review of Live Tissue Versus Simulation Education for Prehospital Trauma Providers
    Goolsby, Craig
    Branting, Andrew
    Ausman, Jason
    Williams, David
    Ausman, Chelsea
    David, Jason
    Allard, Rhonda
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2017, 182 (9-10) : E1824 - E1833
  • [5] Response to: Comment on: Live tissue versus simulation training for emergency procedures: Is simulation ready to replace live tissue?
    Barnes, Stephen L.
    Kerby, Jeffrey
    Armstrong, John
    Llerena, Luis
    Bukoski, Alex
    Anton, Jay
    [J]. SURGERY, 2017, 161 (05) : 1464 - 1465
  • [6] Live Tissue: Ideal for Trauma Training?
    Reeds, Matthew G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (05): : 1268 - 1269
  • [7] Impact of Live Tissue Training on Provider Confidence for Operative Trauma Management
    Liang, Joy N.
    Ciampa, Maeghan
    Kobylarz, Fred
    Anklowitz, Andrew J.
    Barzanji, Natalia K.
    Sherman, William
    Faler, Byron
    [J]. MILITARY MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [8] Trauma Training Using the Live Tissue Model
    Reeds, Matthew G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 69 (04): : 999 - 1000
  • [9] The use of animals in live-tissue trauma training and military medical research
    Gary Martinic
    [J]. Lab Animal, 2011, 40 : 319 - 322
  • [10] The use of animals in live-tissue trauma training and military medical research
    Martinic, Gary
    [J]. LAB ANIMAL, 2011, 40 (10) : 319 - 322