Risk-based, multistage stochastic energy project selection

被引:1
|
作者
Champion, Billy R. [1 ]
Gabriel, Steven A. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Salo, Ahti [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Civil Syst Program, 2146 Glenn L Martin Hall,4298 Campus Dr, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] Univ Maryland, Dept Mech Engn Appl Math & Stat, Sci Computat Program, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Technol Management, Trondheim, Norway
[4] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Ind Econ & Technol Management, Energy Transit Programme, Trondheim, Norway
[5] Aalto Univ, Dept Math & Syst Anal, Syst Anal Lab, Sch Sci, Aalto, Finland
关键词
Energy; Conservation; Optimization; Multistage; Stochastic; Programming; PORTFOLIO SELECTION; TIME CONSISTENCY; OPTIMIZATION; DEFINITION; MANAGEMENT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s12667-020-00396-7
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Energy conservation through the implementation of energy efficient retrofit projects can be viewed as a series of investments with annual returns. These returns can be used to fund additional projects. However, planning for energy conservation ignoring the fluctuations in energy costs and uncertainty in the estimated savings severely impacts project selection and initial budget requests. These impacts drive returns and influence the ability to implement future projects. This paper demonstrates from the Agency perspective, how a risk-based, stochastic multi-period model with binary decision variables at each stage provides a much more accurate estimate for planning than traditional and deterministic models. This approach accounts for uncertainties while determining the proper budget request that minimizes risk of the worst outcomes. The practical application shows that agencies can adjust their risk appetites and make more cost-effective selections while considering the energy saving uncertainties. The application of stochastic optimization with the inclusion of risk to an important energy conservation problem makes the proposed model novel. Finally, while most portfolio selection and optimization problems seek to choose a proper mix of securities or projects, all must be selected here, making the timing the key selection criteria and further differentiates this proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:603 / 640
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Risk-based, multistage stochastic energy project selection
    Billy R. Champion
    Steven A. Gabriel
    Ahti Salo
    Energy Systems, 2023, 14 : 603 - 640
  • [2] Risk-based selection of twin tunnels for the Luhri project, India
    Powell, D.
    Chaudhary, A.
    International Journal on Hydropower and Dams, 2009, 16 (06): : 99 - 103
  • [3] A multistage stochastic programming approach in project selection and scheduling
    Rafiee, Majid
    Kianfar, Farhad
    Farhadkhani, Mehdi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 70 (9-12): : 2125 - 2137
  • [4] A multistage stochastic programming approach in project selection and scheduling
    Majid Rafiee
    Farhad Kianfar
    Mehdi Farhadkhani
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2014, 70 : 2125 - 2137
  • [5] Risk-Based Project Delivery Selection Model for Highway Design and Construction
    Tran, Dai Q.
    Molenaar, Keith R.
    JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 141 (12)
  • [6] Risk-based stochastic scheduling of centralised and distributed energy storage systems
    Majidi, Majid
    Parvania, Masood
    Byrne, Raymond
    IET SMART GRID, 2023, 6 (06) : 596 - 608
  • [7] Stochastic Orders in Risk-Based Overbooking
    Amaruchkul, Kannapha
    CHIANG MAI JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 2010, 37 (03): : 377 - 383
  • [8] Risk-Based Project Management Audit
    Klimova, Julia
    INTEGRATED SCIENCE IN DIGITAL AGE, 2020, 78 : 39 - 49
  • [9] Risk-based optimization of the debt service schedule in renewable energy project finance
    Firouzi, Afshin
    Meshkani, Ali
    UTILITIES POLICY, 2021, 70 (70)
  • [10] Wakeup call for risk-based project management
    Pikas, JL
    MATERIALS PERFORMANCE, 1998, 37 (11) : 8 - 8