Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models Versus Machine Learning Models for Wind Turbine Intelligent Health Diagnosis Systems

被引:3
|
作者
Rababaah, Aaron Rasheed [1 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Kuwait, Coll Engn & Appl Sci, Salmiya, Kuwait
关键词
Wind turbine; Health monitoring; Diagnosis systems; Deep learning; Convolution neural networks; Machine learning; Neural network; Multilayer perceptron; Nearest neighbor classification; Discriminant analysis classification; Self-organizing maps; K-means; Gaussian mixture model; Clustering; Classification; Signal processing; BEARING FAULT-DIAGNOSIS; NETWORK; CLASSIFICATION;
D O I
10.1007/s13369-023-07810-z
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Wind turbines technology is one of the current solutions and a promising one for renewable green energy. Due to its typical remote installations either on land or off-shore, there is a great interest in autonomously monitoring their system's health. The gearbox of the turbine is the primary source of major failures that render the system unsafe, inefficient and/or dysfunctional. Although there have been number of attempts in addressing this problem, number of gaps exist including the lack of detecting early signs of abnormal signals, deep learning (DL) solutions which are rare in this specific area of interest, the impact of number of features in convolution neural networks (CNNs) which was never studied, and the lack of comparative studies between DL versus conventional machine learning (ML) models for this problem of interest. This work presents an investigation that will help close the gap in literature by addressing all four aforementioned issues. Our approach is to propose a CNN model and test it against 6 conventional ML models of supervised learning models (multilayered perceptron, discriminant analysis classification and K-nearest neighbors) and unsupervised learning models (self-organizing maps, K-means clustering and Gaussian mixture model). For model testing, real data were acquired from the US National Renewable Energy Laboratory which includes sensor readings for number of critical parts of the gearbox for healthy and abnormal scenarios. Significant experimentation was conducted on all the 7 models, and observations and results discussion are presented. Among our interesting findings, the auto-learning ability of the CNN model was superior to the most powerful feature extraction technique in digital signal processing, the FFT.
引用
收藏
页码:10875 / 10899
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparative Study of Deep Learning Models Versus Machine Learning Models for Wind Turbine Intelligent Health Diagnosis Systems
    Aaron Rasheed Rababaah
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2023, 48 : 10875 - 10899
  • [2] Wind Power Prediction Based on Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models
    Tarek, Zahraa
    Shams, Mahmoud Y.
    Elshewey, Ahmed M.
    El-kenawy, El-Sayed M.
    Ibrahim, Abdelhameed
    Abdelhamid, Abdelaziz A.
    El-dosuky, Mohamed A.
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2023, 74 (01): : 715 - 732
  • [3] A Comparative Study of Shallow Machine Learning Models and Deep Learning Models for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment Based on Imbalanced Data
    Xu, Shiluo
    Song, Yingxu
    Hao, Xiulan
    FORESTS, 2022, 13 (11):
  • [4] A Comparative Study of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Microplastic Classification using FTIR Spectra
    Thar, Aeint Shune
    Laitrakun, Seksan
    Deepaisarn, Somrudee
    Opaprakasit, Pakorn
    Somnuake, Pattara
    Athikulwongse, Krit
    2023 18TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT SYMPOSIUM ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING, ISAI-NLP, 2023,
  • [5] A Comparative Study on Deep Learning and Machine Learning Models for Human Action Recognition in Aerial Videos
    Kapoor, Surbhi
    Sharma, Akashdeep
    Verma, Amandeep
    Dhull, Vishal
    Goyal, Chahat
    INTERNATIONAL ARAB JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 20 (04) : 567 - 574
  • [6] A Comparative Analysis of various Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Gene Expression
    Thakur, Tanima
    Batra, Isha
    Malik, Arun
    2021 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTING SCIENCES (ICCS 2021), 2021, : 139 - 142
  • [7] Machine learning and deep learning models for the diagnosis of apical periodontitis: a scoping review
    Ángelo Basso
    Fernando Salas
    Marcela Hernández
    Alejandra Fernández
    Alfredo Sierra
    Constanza Jiménez
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 28 (11)
  • [8] Computer-aided diagnosis systems: a comparative study of classical machine learning versus deep learning-based approaches
    Guetari, Ramzi
    Ayari, Helmi
    Sakly, Houneida
    KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2023, 65 (10) : 3881 - 3921
  • [9] Computer-aided diagnosis systems: a comparative study of classical machine learning versus deep learning-based approaches
    Ramzi Guetari
    Helmi Ayari
    Houneida Sakly
    Knowledge and Information Systems, 2023, 65 : 3881 - 3921
  • [10] Which model is more efficient in carbon emission prediction research? A comparative study of deep learning models, machine learning models, and econometric models
    Xiao Yao
    Hong Zhang
    Xiyue Wang
    Yadong Jiang
    Yuxi Zhang
    Xiaohong Na
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2024, 31 : 19500 - 19515