Effects of a team Quality Improvement method in a national clinical audit programme of four clinical specialties in Ministry of Health hospitals in Saudi Arabia

被引:1
|
作者
Alghamdi, Saleh [1 ]
Dixon, Nancy [2 ]
Al-Senani, Fahmi [3 ]
Al Aseri, Zohair [4 ,5 ]
Al Saif, Shukri [6 ]
Altahan, Talal [7 ]
机构
[1] Minist Hlth, Clin Excellence Gen Directorate, Riyadh 14726, Saudi Arabia
[2] Healthcare Qual Quest, Shelley Lane, Romsey SO51 6AS, Hampshire, England
[3] Minist Hlth, Model Care Programme, Stroke Saudi Clin Expert Grp, Riyadh 11525, Saudi Arabia
[4] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency & Crit Care, Sepsis Saudi Clin Expert Grp, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Dar Al Uloom Univ, Riyadh Hosp, Coll Med, Dept Clin Sci,Adult ICU Serv,Minist Hlth, Riyadh 145111, Saudi Arabia
[6] Saudi Al Babtain Cardiac Ctr, Myocardial Infarct Saudi Clin Expert Grp, Eastern Hlth Cluster, Dammam 32632, Saudi Arabia
[7] Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hosp, Major Trauma Saudi Clin Expert Grp, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
national clinical audit; quality improvement; quality improvement methodologies; teamwork; clinical care standards;
D O I
10.1093/intqhc/mzad107
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
In 2018, the Ministry of Health (MoH) in Saudi Arabia developed a clinical excellence strategy. An objective was to reduce variation in clinical practices in MoH hospitals, particularly for conditions with high mortality in Saudi Arabia, by applying best practice clinical standards and using the clinical audit process to measure clinical practice. The strategy included working with multiprofessional teams in hospitals to implement improvements needed in clinical practice. To test the feasibility of carrying out national clinical audits in MoH hospitals, audits were carried out in 16 MoH hospitals on four clinical subjects-acute myocardial infarction, major trauma, sepsis, and stroke. Clinical expert groups, including Saudi clinicians and an international clinical expert, developed clinical care standards for the four conditions from analyses of international and Saudi clinical guidelines. The audits were designed with the expert groups. Multiprofessional teams were appointed to carry out the audits in designated MoH hospitals. Data collectors in each hospital were trained to collect data. Workshops were held with the teams on the clinical care standards and how data would be collected for the audits, and later, on the findings of data collection and how to use the improvement process to implement changes to improve compliance with the standards. After 4 months, data collection was repeated to determine if compliance with the clinical care standards had improved. Data collected from each hospital for both cycles of data collection were independently reliably tested. All designated hospitals participated in the audits, collecting and submitting data for two rounds of data collection and implementing improvement plans after the first round of data collection. All hospitals made substantial improvements in clinical practices. Of a total of 84 measures used to assess compliance with a total of 52 clinical care standards for the four clinical conditions, improvements were made by hospital teams in 58 (69.1%) measures. Improvements were statistically significant for 34 (40.5%) measures. The project demonstrated that well-designed and executed audits using evidence-based clinical care standards can result in substantial improvements in clinical practices in MoH hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Keys to success were the improvement methodology built into the audit process and the requirement for hospitals to appoint multiprofessional teams to carry out the audits. The approach adds to evidence on the effectiveness of clinical audits in achieving improvements in clinical quality and can be replicated in national audit programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 38 条