Numerical evidence against advantage with quantum fidelity kernels on classical data

被引:5
|
作者
Slattery, Lucas [1 ,2 ]
Shaydulin, Ruslan [3 ]
Chakrabarti, Shouvanik [3 ]
Pistoia, Marco [3 ]
Khairy, Sami [2 ,5 ]
Wild, Stefan M. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Phys, Champaign, IL 61820 USA
[2] Argonne Natl Lab, Math & Comp Sci Div, Lemont, IL 60439 USA
[3] JPMorgan Chase, Global Technol Appl Res, New York, NY 10017 USA
[4] Lawrence Berkeley Natl Lab, Appl Math & Computat Res Div, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[5] Microsoft Vancouver, Vancouver, BC V7Y 1G5, Canada
关键词
STATISTICAL-MECHANICS; PARAMETER-ESTIMATION; BARREN PLATEAUS; POWER;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.107.062417
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Quantum machine learning techniques are commonly considered one of the most promising candidates for demonstrating practical quantum advantage. In particular, quantum kernel methods have been demonstrated to be able to learn certain classically intractable functions efficiently if the kernel is well aligned with the target function. In the more general case, quantum kernels are known to suffer from exponential "flattening" of the spectrum as the number of qubits grows, preventing generalization and necessitating the control of the inductive bias by hyperparameters. We show that the general-purpose hyperparameter-tuning techniques proposed to improve the generalization of quantum kernels lead to the kernel becoming well approximated by a classical kernel, removing the possibility of quantum advantage. We provide extensive numerical evidence for this phenomenon utilizing multiple previously studied quantum feature maps and both synthetic and real data. Our results show that unless novel techniques are developed to control the inductive bias of quantum kernels, they are unlikely to provide a quantum advantage on classical data that lacks special structure.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Numerical evidence of quantum correspondence to the classical ergodicity
    Jie, QL
    Xu, GO
    COMMUNICATIONS IN THEORETICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 26 (02) : 191 - 196
  • [2] Quantum Alphatron: quantum advantage for learning with kernels and noise
    Yang, Siyi
    Guo, Naixu
    Santha, Miklos
    Rebentrost, Patrick
    QUANTUM, 2023, 7
  • [3] A framework for demonstrating practical quantum advantage: comparing quantum against classical generative models
    Hibat-Allah, Mohamed
    Mauri, Marta
    Carrasquilla, Juan
    Perdomo-Ortiz, Alejandro
    COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [4] A framework for demonstrating practical quantum advantage: comparing quantum against classical generative models
    Mohamed Hibat-Allah
    Marta Mauri
    Juan Carrasquilla
    Alejandro Perdomo-Ortiz
    Communications Physics, 7
  • [5] Classical–quantum advantage boundary for enzymes
    Kaitlin McCardle
    Nature Computational Science, 2022, 2 : 620 - 620
  • [6] Benchmarking of quantum fidelity kernels for Gaussian process regression
    Guo, Xuyang
    Dai, Jun
    Krems, Roman, V
    MACHINE LEARNING-SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 5 (03):
  • [7] Numerical Evidence of Quantum Melting of Spin Ice: Quantum-to-Classical Crossover
    Kato, Yasuyuki
    Onoda, Shigeki
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2015, 115 (07)
  • [8] Quantum Advantage: A Single Qubit's Experimental Edge in Classical Data Storage
    Ding, Chen
    Lobo, Edwin Peter
    Alimuddin, Mir
    Xu, Xiao-Yue
    Zhang, Shuo
    Banik, Manik
    Bao, Wan-Su
    Huang, He-Liang
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2024, 133 (20)
  • [9] Classical communication and non-classical fidelity of quantum teleportation
    Banik, Manik
    Gazi, Md. Rajjak
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2013, 12 (11) : 3607 - 3615
  • [10] Classical communication and non-classical fidelity of quantum teleportation
    Manik Banik
    Md. Rajjak Gazi
    Quantum Information Processing, 2013, 12 : 3607 - 3615