Beneficial Effects of Low-Dose Intravenous Dexmedetomidine Premedication in Patient Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:1
|
作者
Zheng, Longbin [1 ]
Fang, Tao [2 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Zhang, Xiaojing [1 ]
Ren, Zhiqiang [1 ]
Qin, Weimin [1 ]
Liang, Wenbo [1 ]
Ma, Qing [1 ]
Yin, Ning [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Med Univ, Sir Run Run Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Xinchang Cty Peoples Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, Xinchang, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Med Univ, Sir Run Run Hosp, Dept Anesthesiol, 109 Longmian Ave, Nanjing 211112, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
dexmedetomidine; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; general anesthesia; premedication; REMIFENTANIL; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.2147/DDDT.S452077
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
Purpose: Dexmedetomidine (Dex) is a potent and highly selective alpha 2-adrenergic receptor agonist. Within an appropriate dose range, Dex can effectively attenuate the surgical stress response, provide intraoperative hemodynamic stability, and improve the patient recovery quality. High -dose Dex can delay patient awakening from anesthesia and increase the incidence of bradycardia. This randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of low -dose intravenous Dex premedication in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Material and Methods: In total, 100 patients undergoing LC were equally randomized into Group C (premedication with saline) and Group D (premedication with 0.5 mu g/kg Dex). The patients were premedicated with saline or Dex, depending on the group, before anesthesia induction. Following this, anesthesia induction and endotracheal intubation was performed, and anesthesia was maintained during surgery. Following the completion of the surgery, the patients were transferred the post -anesthesia care unit (PACU) and stayed there until they met the PACU discharge criteria. The hemodynamic parameters, consumption of anesthetics, surgical duration, postoperative awakening time, extubation time, postoperative pain, and complications were recorded. Results: No significant differences were observed in the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) between the two groups before premedication (P>0.05). The MAP and HR immediately after endotracheal intubation and immediately after extubation were significantly lower in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05 for both). The incidence of bradycardia was significantly higher in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05), while atropine was used in neither group. Propofol and remifentanil consumption was significantly lower in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05). The postoperative awakening and extubation times were significantly shorter in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05). The postoperative visual analog scale scores for pain and incidence of nausea, vomiting, and cough were significantly lower in Group D than in Group C (P<0.05 for all). Conclusion: Our data suggest that premedication with dexmedetomidine (0.5 mu g/kg) before general anesthesia induction can effectively attenuate intraoperative stress response and postoperative pain, maintain perioperative hemodynamic stability, and decrease the incidence of adverse events, which might be an effective and safe anesthetic protocol during LC worthy of further clinical application.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 452
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Safety and efficacy of low-dose esketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Zhao, Lu
    Li, Zhengyu
    Jin, Bi
    Hou, Nina
    Yang, Heng
    [J]. BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of low-dose esketamine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Lu Zhao
    Zhengyu Li
    Bi Jin
    Nina Hou
    Heng Yang
    [J]. BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [3] Low-Dose Intramuscular Dexmedetomidine as Premedication: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sun, Yang
    Liu, Chaolei
    Zhang, Yuehong
    Luo, Bin
    She, Shouzhang
    Xu, Lixin
    Ruan, Xiangcai
    [J]. MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2014, 20 : 2714 - 2719
  • [4] Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Trichak Sandhu
    Sahattaya Paiboonworachat
    Wasana Ko-iam
    [J]. Surgical Endoscopy, 2011, 25 : 23 - 27
  • [5] Effects of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a double-blind randomized controlled trial
    Sandhu, Trichak
    Paiboonworachat, Sahattaya
    Ko-iam, Wasana
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 25 (01): : 23 - 27
  • [6] Intravenous hyoscine as a premedication for colonoscopy: A randomized double-blind controlled trial
    Yoong, KY
    Perkin, D
    Portal, J
    Strickland, I
    Heymann, T
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 36 (08) : 720 - 722
  • [7] Analgesic effect of gabapentin premedication in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial
    Gregg, AK
    Francis, S
    Sharpe, P
    Rowbotham, DJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 87 (01) : 174P - 174P
  • [8] Peritrocal and Intraperitoneal Ropivacaine for Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Cha, Su Man
    Kang, Hyun
    Baek, Chong Wha
    Jung, Yong Hun
    Koo, Gill Hoi
    Kim, Beom Gyu
    Choi, Yoo Shin
    Cha, Seong Jae
    Cha, Young Joo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 175 (02) : 251 - 258
  • [9] Low-dose dexmedetomidine provides hemodynamics stabilization during emergence and recovery from general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Shogo Tsujikawa
    Kazutoshi Ikeshita
    [J]. Journal of Anesthesia, 2019, 33 : 266 - 272
  • [10] Low-dose dexmedetomidine provides hemodynamics stabilization during emergence and recovery from general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial
    Tsujikawa, Shogo
    Ikeshita, Kazutoshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (02) : 266 - 272