Increasing Robustness of Agents' Decision-Making in Production Automation using Sanctioning

被引:0
|
作者
Land, Kathrin [1 ]
Nardin, Luis Gustavo [2 ]
Vogel-Heuser, Birgit [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Sch Engn & Design, Inst Automat & Informat Syst, Garching, Germany
[2] Univ Clermont Auvergne, Mines St Etienne, INP Clermont Auvergne, CNRS,UMR 6158,LIMOS, F-42023 St Etienne, France
[3] MDSI, Garching, Germany
关键词
production automation; multi-agent systems; decision-making; sanctioning; MODEL;
D O I
10.1109/INDIN51400.2023.10217852
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Industry 4.0 requires high reconfigurability and flexibility of cyber-physical production systems (CPPS). Agent-based approaches are introduced to realize decentralized decision-making and flexibility within CPPS. Agents negotiate with each other regarding task allocation in production systems to achieve a global goal together. In non-deterministic systems, agents' decision-making can become inaccurate due to misalignment between the agents' beliefs and the actual state of the physical system they represent. (Un)Intentional misestimations can lead to non-optimal task allocation regarding the global system's goal. Additionally, decisions that benefit individual agents' goals, such as 'get all tasks', can contradict the global system's goal. In this paper, a sanctioning approach known from socio-technical systems is integrated into a non-deterministic production plant consisting of a process part and a logistics part to increase the robustness of agents' decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DECISION-MAKING AUTOMATION FUZZY DECISION-MAKING IN INDUSTRY
    Soulhi, Aziz
    Guedira, Said
    El Alami, Nour-eddine
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WSEAS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING AND DATA BASES, 2009, : 181 - +
  • [2] NOTE ON ROBUSTNESS AND INTERDEPENDENT DECISION-MAKING
    ROSENHEAD, J
    WIEDEMANN, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 1979, 30 (09) : 833 - 834
  • [3] Uncertainty and robustness in planning and decision-making
    Antunes, Carlos Henggeler
    Rios Insua, David
    Dias, Luis Candido
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2014, 45 (01) : 1 - 2
  • [4] Does automation bias decision-making?
    Skitka, LJ
    Mosier, KL
    Burdick, M
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 1999, 51 (05) : 991 - 1006
  • [5] Strategic automation and decision-making authority
    Dogan, Mustafa
    Jacquillat, Alexandre
    Yildirim, Pinar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT STRATEGY, 2024, 33 (01) : 203 - 246
  • [6] Agents for distributed decision-making
    Talukdar, S
    [J]. 2003 IEEE POWER ENGINEERING SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, VOLS 1-4, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 42 - 43
  • [7] Software agents and decision-making
    Matos Bernardo, Maria do Rosario
    Palma-dos-Reis, Antonio
    [J]. ACTAS DA 1A CONFERENCIA IBERICA DE SISTEMAS E TECNOLOGIAS DE INFORMACAO, VOL II, 2006, : 357 - 373
  • [8] ROBUSTNESS OF LINEAR-MODELS FOR DECISION-MAKING
    ASHTON, RH
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1976, 4 (05): : 609 - 615
  • [9] Automation of Decision-Making Processes: Opportunities and Risks
    N. A. Mezina
    G. V. Tikhonov
    [J]. Russian Engineering Research, 2024, 44 (3) : 400 - 404
  • [10] The Rule of Law and Automation of Government Decision-Making
    Zalnieriute, Monika
    Moses, Lyria Bennett
    Williams, George
    [J]. MODERN LAW REVIEW, 2019, 82 (03): : 425 - 455