Evaluating Losses from Water Scarcity and Benefits of Water Conservation Measures to Intercity Supply Chains in China

被引:12
|
作者
She, Yunlei [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Jiayang [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Qi [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Liping [3 ]
Duan, Kai [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Ranran [6 ]
Qu, Shen [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Ming [7 ]
Zhao, Yong [8 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Ctr Energy & Environm Policy Res, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[3] Zhengzhou Univ Light Ind, Sch Econ & Management, Zhengzhou 450001, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[5] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Peoples R China
[6] Leiden Univ, Inst Environm Sci CML, NL-2333 CC Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Environm, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[8] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, State Key Lab Simulat & Regulat Water Cycle River, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
water scarcity loss; waterconservation measure; benefit evaluation; agent-basedmodel; supply chainnetwork; ENVIRONMENTAL FLOW REQUIREMENTS; CHALLENGES; MODEL; RISK; IRRIGATION; FOOTPRINT; QUANTITY; IMPACT; TRADE; LEVEL;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.3c07491
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The severe water scarcity in China poses significant economic risks to its agriculture, energy, and manufacturing sectors, which can have a cascading effect through the supply chains. Current research has assessed water scarcity losses for global countries and Chinese provinces by using the water scarcity risk (WSR) method. However, this method involves subjective functions and parameter settings, and it fails to capture the adaptive behaviors of economies to water scarcity, compromising the reliability of quantified water scarcity loss. There is a pressing need for a new method to assess losses related to water scarcity. Here, we develop an agent-based complex network model to estimate the inter-regional and intersectoral impacts of water scarcity on both cities and basins. Subsequently, we evaluate the supply chain-wide economic benefits of four different water conservation measures as stipulated by the 14th Five-Year Plan for the Construction of a Water-Saving Society. These measures include increasing the utilization rate of recycled water in water-scarce cities, reducing the national water consumption per industrial value-added, and implementing agricultural and residential water conservation measures. Results show that direct losses constitute only 9% of the total losses from water scarcity. Approximately 37% of the losses can be attributed to interregional impacts. Among the water-scarce cities, Qingdao, Lanzhou, Jinan, and Zhengzhou pose a significant threat to China's supply chains. Agricultural water conservation yields the highest amount of water savings and economic benefits, while residential water conservation provides the highest economic benefit per unit of water saved. The results provide insights into managing water scarcity, promoting cross-regional cooperation, and mitigating economic impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:1119 / 1130
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Water transfer infrastructure buffers water scarcity risks to supply chains
    Sun, Siao
    Tang, Qiuhong
    Konar, Megan
    Fang, Chuanglin
    Liu, Haixing
    Liu, Xingcai
    Fu, Guangtao
    WATER RESEARCH, 2023, 229
  • [2] Soil and water conservation measures reduce soil and water losses in China but not down to background levels: Evidence from erosion plot data
    Zhao, Jianlin
    Yang, Zhiqiang
    Govers, Gerard
    GEODERMA, 2019, 337 : 729 - 741
  • [3] Evaluating water conservation measures for Green Building in Taiwan
    Cheng, CL
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2003, 38 (02) : 369 - 379
  • [4] Achievemnets, approach and benefits of soil and water conservation in China
    Liu, XY
    Chen, YH
    Wang, G
    Gan, P
    Sun, G
    Miagostovich, M
    Yang, AM
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE NINTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON RIVER SEDIMENTATION, VOLS 1-4, 2004, : 2318 - 2323
  • [5] China's regional water scarcity and implications for grain supply and trade
    Yang, H
    Zehnder, A
    ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING A-ECONOMY AND SPACE, 2001, 33 (01): : 79 - 95
  • [6] Benefits of Conservation Agriculture on Soil and Water Conservation and Its Progress in China
    LI Lingling HUANG Gaobao ZHANG Renzhi Bill Bellotti Guangdi Li and Kwong Yin Chan Gansu Provincial Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop ScienceFaculty of Agronomy Gansu Agricultural University Lanzhou PRChina Faculty of Resource and Environment Gansu Agricultural University Lanzhou PRChina School of Natural Sciences University of Western Sydney NSW Australia EH Graham Centre for Agricultural Innovation Alliance Between Investment Industry NSW and Charles Sturt University Wagga Wagga Agricultural Institute NSW Australia Investment Industry NSW NSW Australia
    AgriculturalSciencesinChina, 2011, 10 (06) : 850 - 859
  • [7] Benefits of Conservation Agriculture on Soil and Water Conservation and Its Progress in China
    Li Ling-ling
    Huang Gao-bao
    Zhang Ren-zhi
    Bellotti, Bill
    Li, Guangdi
    Chan, Kwong Yin
    AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES IN CHINA, 2011, 10 (06): : 850 - 859
  • [8] Determining the Economic Benefit of Watershed Conservation for Urban Water Supply Based on Scarcity rent for Water and Consumer Surplus
    Belladona, Rossano
    Marques, Guilherme Fernandes
    De Vargas, Tiago
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2025, 39 (02) : 795 - 808
  • [9] Interaction of soil and water conservation measures with soil water in the loess plateau in China
    Mu, Xingmin
    Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2000, 16 (02): : 41 - 45
  • [10] Determining the Economic Benefit of Watershed Conservation for Urban Water Supply Based on Scarcity rent for Water and Consumer SurplusDetermining the Economic Benefit of Watershed Conservation for Urban Water Supply Based on Scarcity rent for Water and Consumer SurplusR. Belladona et al.
    Rossano Belladona
    Guilherme Fernandes Marques
    Tiago De Vargas
    Water Resources Management, 2025, 39 (2) : 795 - 808