Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after correction surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:2
|
作者
Ji, XingHua [1 ,2 ]
Wei, LinDong [1 ,2 ]
Xing, ZeJun [1 ,2 ]
Duan, YuChen [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Shanxi Med Univ, Shanxi Bethune Hosp, Tongji Shanxi Hosp, Shanxi Acad Med Sci,Hosp 3, Taiyuan 030032, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
关键词
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis; Proximal junctional kyphosis; Risk factor; Meta-analysis; SPINAL-FUSION; INSTRUMENTATION; ALIGNMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-024-04638-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim To analyze the risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) after correction surgery in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). Methods PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, and EMCC databases were searched for retrospective studies utilizing all AIS patients with PJK after corrective surgery to collect preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up imaging parameters, including thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), proximal junctional angle (PJA), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), sacral slope (SS), rod contour angle (RCA) and upper instrumented vertebra (UIV). Results Nineteen retrospective studies were included in this meta-analysis, including 550 patients in the intervention group and 3456 patients in the control group. Overall, sex (OR 1.40, 95% CI (1.08, 1.83), P = 0.01), larger preoperative TK (WMD 6.82, 95% CI (5.48, 8.16), P < 0.00001), larger follow-up TK (WMD 8.96, 95% CI (5.62, 12.30), P < 0.00001), larger postoperative LL (WMD 2.31, 95% CI (0.91, 3.71), P = 0.001), larger follow-up LL (WMD 2.51, 95% CI (1.19, 3.84), P = 0.0002), great change in LL (WMD - 2.72, 95% CI (- 4.69, - 0.76), P = 0.006), larger postoperative PJA (WMD 4.94, 95% CI (3.62, 6.26), P < 0.00001), larger follow-up PJA (WMD 13.39, 95% CI (11.09, 15.69), P < 0.00001), larger postoperative PI-LL (WMD - 9.57, 95% CI (- 17.42, - 1.71), P = 0.02), larger follow-up PI-LL (WMD - 12.62, 95% CI (- 17.62, - 7.62), P < 0.00001), larger preoperative SVA (WMD 0.73, 95% CI (0.26, 1.19), P = 0.002), larger preoperative SS (WMD - 3.43, 95% CI (- 4.71, - 2.14), P < 0.00001), RCA (WMD 1.66, 95% CI (0.48, 2.84), P = 0.006) were identified as risk factors for PJK in patients with AIS. For patients with Lenke 5 AIS, larger preoperative TK (WMD 7.85, 95% CI (5.69, 10.00), P < 0.00001), larger postoperative TK (WMD 9.66, 95% CI (1.06, 18.26), P = 0.03, larger follow-up TK (WMD 11.92, 95% CI (6.99, 16.86), P < 0.00001, larger preoperative PJA (WMD 0.72, 95% CI (0.03, 1.41), P = 0.04, larger postoperative PJA (WMD 5.54, 95% CI (3.57, 7.52), P < 0.00001), larger follow-up PJA (WMD 12.42, 95% CI 9.24, 15.60), P < 0.00001, larger follow-up SVA (WMD 0.07, 95% CI (- 0.46, 0.60), P = 0.04), larger preoperative PT (WMD - 3.04, 95% CI (- 5.27, - 0.81), P = 0.008, larger follow-up PT (WMD - 3.69, 95% CI (- 6.66, - 0.72), P = 0.02) were identified as risk factors for PJK. Conclusion Following corrective surgery, 19% of AIS patients experienced PJK, with Lenke 5 contributing to 25%. Prior and post-op measurements play significant roles in predicting PJK occurrence; thus, meticulous, personalized preoperative planning is crucial. This includes considering individualized treatments based on the Lenke classification as our future evaluation standard.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Incidence and risk factors of proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after correction surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    XingHua Ji
    LinDong Wei
    ZeJun Xing
    YuChen Duan
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 19
  • [2] Incidence and Risk Factors for Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis After Correction Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhong, Junlong
    Cao, Kai
    Wang, Bin
    Li, Huizi
    Zhou, Xuemei
    Xu, Xianghe
    Lin, Nan
    Liu, Quanfei
    Lu, Huading
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 125 : E326 - E335
  • [3] Systematic review and meta-analysis for the proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Zhao, Jian
    Huang, Chen
    Liu, Yifei
    Liu, Da
    Liao, Dongfa
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [4] Risk factors for distal junctional kyphosis after posterior spinal surgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis
    Jia, Ruili
    Long, Yubin
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 10
  • [5] Risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Xuexin
    Ren, Jiabin
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2022, 56 (03) : 158 - 165
  • [6] Characteristics and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lixue Zou
    Jun Liu
    Hougen Lu
    Neurosurgical Review, 2019, 42 : 671 - 682
  • [7] Characteristics and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after correction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zou, Lixue
    Liu, Jun
    Lu, Hougen
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2019, 42 (03) : 671 - 682
  • [8] Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Feng-Yu
    Wang, Tao
    Yang, Si-Dong
    Wang, Hui
    Yang, Da-Long
    Ding, Wen-Yuan
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (08) : 2376 - 2383
  • [9] Incidence and risk factors for proximal junctional kyphosis: a meta-analysis
    Feng-Yu Liu
    Tao Wang
    Si-Dong Yang
    Hui Wang
    Da-Long Yang
    Wen-Yuan Ding
    European Spine Journal, 2016, 25 : 2376 - 2383
  • [10] Proximal Junctional Kyphosis Following Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Correction
    Ha, Alex S.
    Park, Paul J.
    Levitsky, Matthew M.
    Konigsberg, Matthew W.
    Kim, Yongjung J.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 36 (01) : 7 - 11