Heterogeneous donor circles for fair liver transplant allocation

被引:3
|
作者
Akshat, Shubham [1 ]
Gentry, Sommer E. [2 ,3 ]
Raghavan, S. [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[2] New York Univ, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] New York Univ, Grossman Sch Med, Dept Populat Hlth, New York, NY 10016 USA
[4] Univ Maryland, Robert H Smith Sch Business, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
[5] Univ Maryland, Syst Res Inst, College Pk, MD 20742 USA
关键词
Health care policy; Liver transplant; Geographical disparity; Optimization; Operations research; EFFICIENCY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1007/s10729-022-09602-7
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The United States (U.S.) Department of Health and Human Services is interested in increasing geographical equity in access to liver transplant. The geographical disparity in the U.S. is fundamentally an outcome of variation in the organ supply to patient demand (s/d) ratios across the country (which cannot be treated as a single unit due to its size). To design a fairer system, we develop a nonlinear integer programming model that allocates the organ supply in order to maximize the minimum s/d ratios across all transplant centers. We design circular donation regions that are able to address the issues raised in legal challenges to earlier organ distribution frameworks. This allows us to reformulate our model as a set-partitioning problem. Our policy can be viewed as a heterogeneous donor circle policy, where the integer program optimizes the radius of the circle around each donation location. Compared to the current policy, which has fixed radius circles around donation locations, the heterogeneous donor circle policy greatly improves both the worst s/d ratio and the range between the maximum and minimum s/d ratios. We found that with the fixed radius policy of 500 nautical miles (NM), the s/d ratio ranges from 0.37 to 0.84 at transplant centers, while with the heterogeneous circle policy capped at a maximum radius of 500 NM, the s/d ratio ranges from 0.55 to 0.60, closely matching the national s/d ratio average of 0.5983. Our model matches the supply and demand in a more equitable fashion than existing policies and has a significant potential to improve the liver transplantation landscape.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 45
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Heterogeneous donor circles for fair liver transplant allocation
    Shubham Akshat
    Sommer E. Gentry
    S. Raghavan
    Health Care Management Science, 2024, 27 : 20 - 45
  • [2] Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation
    Wood, Nicholas L.
    Kernodle, Amber B.
    Hartley, Andrew J.
    Segev, Dorry L.
    Gentry, Sommer E.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2021, 74 (01) : 312 - 321
  • [3] Implementation of acuity circles model of liver transplant graft allocation modulates donor liver offers
    Miller, W.
    Brintlinger, A.
    Kandaswamy, R.
    Adams, A.
    Humphreville, V.
    Chinnakotla, S.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 30 : 92 - 92
  • [4] Implementation of Acuity Circles Model of Liver Transplant Graft Allocation Modulates Donor Liver Offers
    Brintlinger, Amanda
    Miller, William
    Kandaswamy, Raja
    Adams, Andrew
    Humphreville, Vanessa
    Chinnakotla, Srinath
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 24 (01) : S17 - S17
  • [5] Heterogeneous Circles For Liver Allocation To Reduce Geographic Disparity In Liver Supply/Demand Ratios
    Wood, Nicholas
    Kernodle, Amber
    Hartley, Andrew
    Segev, Dorry
    Gentry, Sommer
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2020, 20 : 15 - 15
  • [6] Effect on Kidney Transplant Allocation With the Implementation of Concentric Circles Liver Allocation Policy: Impact of Simultaneous Liver Kidney Transplantation
    Brewer, Jennifer
    Aakjar, Leah
    O'Sullivan, David
    Dar, Wasim
    Ebcioglu, Zeynep
    Einstein, Michael
    Morgan, Glyn
    Emmanuel, Bishoy
    Ye, Xiaoyi
    Singh, Joseph U.
    Sotil, Eva U.
    Swales, Colin
    Richardson, Elizabeth
    Serrano, Oscar K.
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 106 (09) : S20 - S20
  • [7] Allocation Based on Acuity Circles Decreases Waiting Time for Liver Transplant Patients.
    Kim, M. H.
    Sasaki, K.
    Gallo, A.
    Pham, T.
    Melcher, M. L.
    Busque, S.
    Esquivel, C.
    Bonham, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 22 : 829 - 830
  • [8] Perceptions of the New Acuity Circles Allocation Policy Among Liver Transplant Centers in the US
    Pawlak, Natalie
    Song, Cherilyn
    Alvi, Saba
    Kwon, Yong Kyong
    Rauf, Muhammad A.
    Akoad, Mohamed Elhassan
    Mulligan, David C.
    Aziz, Hassan
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2023, 236 (05) : S122 - S122
  • [9] Is donor aid allocation to Iraq fair?
    Singh, JA
    LANCET, 2003, 362 (9396): : 1672 - 1673
  • [10] Fair Resource Allocation for Heterogeneous Tasks
    Mukherjee, Koyel
    Dutta, Partha
    Raravi, Gurulingesh
    Rajasubramaniam, Thangaraj
    Dasgupta, Koustuv
    Singh, Atul
    2015 IEEE 29TH INTERNATIONAL PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED PROCESSING SYMPOSIUM (IPDPS), 2015, : 1087 - 1096