Patient-Specific Pre-Treatment VMAT Plan Verification Using Gamma Passing Rates

被引:0
|
作者
Arsalan, M. Z. [1 ,2 ]
Kakakhel, M. B. [2 ]
Shamshad, M. [3 ]
Afridi, T. A. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Atom Energy Med Ctr, Med Phys Div, Karachi AEMC K, Sindh, Pakistan
[2] Pakistan Inst Engn & Appl Sci PIEAS, Dept Phys & Appl Math, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Danish Ctr Particle Therapy DCPT, Aarhus, Denmark
[4] Atom Energy Canc Hosp NORIN, Med Phys Div, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan
关键词
Treatment planning system; Gamma analysis; Octavius 4D setup; Gamma acceptance criteria; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; COMPLEXITY; QA; THERAPY; METRICS; IMRT;
D O I
10.55981/aij.2023.1261
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Continuous gantry motion, continuous beam modulation, and variable dose rate are used in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to obtain highly conformal radiation therapy dose distributions. Several errors during daily radiation therapy treatment can be sources of uncertainties in dose delivery. These errors include monitor unit calculation errors and other human mistakes. Due to the uncertainties in the excessively modulated VMAT plan, the intended dose distribution is not delivered perfectly, leading to a mismatch between the measured and planned dose distributions. This necessitates an extensive and effective quality assurance (QA) program for both machine and patient. In this study, VMAT QA plan verification of 62 head and neck (H&N) and 19 prostate cases was done using Octavius 4D setup with its associating VeriSoft gamma analysis software. The plans showed a maximum 3D gamma passing rate with 4 mm/3 % gamma acceptance criteria, i.e., 99.7 % for the H&N cancer cases and 99.5 % for the prostate cancer cases. Local gamma analysis was also performed for both regions. Furthermore, 2D and volumetric gamma analyses were also carried out. Gamma analysis with respect to different axis was also carried out. It was known that the transversal axis showed the highest gamma passing rate in both H&N and prostate cases, i.e., 99.17 % and 98.3 %, respectively. The transverse axis came to be a better fit for the planned dose distribution.(c) 2023 Atom Indonesia. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 59
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Unifying gamma passing rates in patient-specific QA for VMAT lung cancer treatment based on data assimilation
    Ono, Tomohiro
    Adachi, Takanori
    Hirashima, Hideaki
    Iramina, Hiraku
    Kishi, Noriko
    Matsuo, Yukinori
    Nakamura, Mitsuhiro
    Mizowaki, Takashi
    [J]. PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2024,
  • [2] Dosimetric evaluation of a 3D printed phantom for patient-specific pre-treatment plan verification
    Makris, D. N.
    Zoros, E.
    Boursianis, T.
    Pappas, E.
    Maris, T. G.
    Efstathopoulos, E. P.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S39 - S40
  • [3] Impact of plan parameters in gamma passing rates in VMAT QA
    Garcia Perez, A.
    Alonso-Etxarri, M.
    Gonzalez-Pose, A.
    Vazquez-Rodriguez, J.
    Lopez Medina, A.
    Teijeiro-Garcia, A. G.
    Alvarez-Andrade, B.
    Medal-Francesch, D.
    Salvador-Gomez, F.
    Salgado-Fernandez, M.
    [J]. RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S721 - S722
  • [4] A model-based 3D patient-specific pre-treatment QA method for VMAT using the EPID
    McCowan, P. M.
    Asuni, G.
    van Beek, T.
    van Uytven, E.
    Kujanpaa, K.
    McCurdy, B. M. C.
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2017, 62 (04): : 1600 - 1612
  • [5] Patient Specific Pre-treatment QA Verification using an EPID Approach
    Quino, Luis A. Vazquez
    Chen, Xiaoming
    Fitzpatrick, Mathew
    Shi, Chengyu
    Stathakis, Sotirios
    Gutierrez, Alonso
    Esquivel, Carlos
    Mavroidis, Panayiotis
    Alkhatib, Hassan
    Papanikolaou, Niko
    [J]. TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2014, 13 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [6] Treatment plan complexity quantification for predicting gamma passing rates in patient-specific quality assurance for stereotactic volumetric modulated arc therapy
    Xue, Xudong
    Luan, Shunyao
    Ding, Yi
    Li, Xiangbin
    Li, Dan
    Wang, Jingya
    Ma, Chi
    Jiang, Man
    Wei, Wei
    Wang, Xiao
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024,
  • [7] Need of patient-specific quality assurance and pre-treatment verification program for special plans in radiotherapy
    Ravichandran, Ramamoorthy
    Bhasi, Saju
    Binukumar, J. P.
    Davis, C. A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 36 (03) : 181 - 183
  • [8] The Correlation of MLCleaf Trajectory Errors and Gamma Passing Rates of Patient-Specific ArcCheck-Based QA for Varian TrueBeam VMAT
    Watanabe, Y.
    Claps, L.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E857 - E857
  • [9] Use of MAPPHAN for Patient Specific VMAT Plan Verification
    Comsa, D.
    Barnett, E.
    Moseley, D.
    van Prooijen, M.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 38 (06)
  • [10] Best Practice Guidance for Patient-Specific Quality Assurance for IMRT and VMAT Plan Delivery Verification
    Chan, G.
    Abdellatif, A.
    Bissonnette, J.
    Chin, L.
    Comsa, D.
    Granville, D.
    Himmelman, J. Kraus
    King, J.
    Rapley, P.
    Vandermeer, A.
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 47 (06) : E506 - E506