The cross-country evaluation of nuclear science and technology publications

被引:1
|
作者
Loan, Fayaz Ahmad [1 ]
Shah, Ufaira Yaseen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kashmir, Ctr Cent Asian Studies, Srinagar, India
关键词
Scientometrics; Bibliometrics; Activity index; Attractivity index; Publication efficiency index; Nuclear science and technology; OUTPUT;
D O I
10.1108/CC-10-2021-0029
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
Purpose The purpose of this study is to measure the quality of nuclear science and technology research using the scientometric indicators, like activity index, attractivity index and publication efficiency index. Design/methodology/approach The present scientometric study is based on the bibliographic data extracted from the core collection of the Web of Science database from 1989 to 2019. The data was collected using the advanced search feature, with a search string of 28 related terms. The bibliographic data for all the journal articles, excluding all other formats, was downloaded for statistical analysis. Findings The present study highlights the growth pattern and the research efforts devoted to the field of nuclear science and technology worldwide, as reflected through the Core Collection of the Web of Science database, for 31 years from 1989 to 2019. The USA has emerged as the topmost producer, with a total share of almost 29% with respect to the world literature followed by Japan, Germany, France and UK. However, the relative citation impact has been the highest for Netherlands followed by the USA, Germany, France and UK, respectively. The study depicted that the activity index, also called as the relative performance indicator, has been the highest for the USA, whereas the attractivity index has been the highest for China, indicating its dominance in attracting citations to its publications in the field of nuclear science and technology. The publication efficiency index, the value has been the maximum for Iran, for which the value has been greater than 1 (1.618). The measure suggests that Iran's research effectiveness in the field of nuclear science and technology has been more than the research effort devoted to the field. Research limitations/implications The paper was based on the data retrieved from a single database, and the results may vary across other databases. Hence, caution should be taken while generalizing the findings. Originality/value Several scientometric studies have taken place in the field of nuclear science and technology, particularly in its allied branches, but none of the studies has focused on evaluating the research efforts carried out by the countries in terms of activity index, attractivity index and publication efficiency index, and the present study is an attempt to fill the gap.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 39
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Exploring science-and-technology-led innovation: A cross-country study
    Raghupathi V.
    Raghupathi W.
    Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8 (1) : 1 - 45
  • [2] SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION IN SPANISH ECONOMY: EUROPEAN CROSS-COUNTRY SITUATION
    Dones Tacero, Milagros
    Isabel Heredero de Pablos, Ma
    REVISTA DE ECONOMIA MUNDIAL, 2009, (23): : 131 - 150
  • [3] Predatory publications in Scopus: Evidence on cross-country differences
    Machacek, Vit
    Srholec, Martin
    17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SCIENTOMETRICS & INFORMETRICS (ISSI2019), VOL I, 2019, : 351 - 362
  • [5] Cross-country technology diffusion: The case of computers
    Caselli, F
    Coleman, WJ
    AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (02): : 328 - 335
  • [6] Knowledge Sharing Benefits Among Companies in Science and Technology Parks: A Cross-Country Analysis
    Steffen, Mario Oscar
    Oliveira, Mirian
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE ON KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT (ECKM 2018), VOLS 1 AND 2, 2018, : 1089 - 1097
  • [7] Research publications and economic growth: evidence from cross-country regressions
    Jin, Jang C.
    Jin, Lawrence
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2013, 45 (08) : 983 - 990
  • [8] 'CROSS-COUNTRY'
    FINGER, A
    ANTIOCH REVIEW, 1981, 39 (01): : 38 - 53
  • [9] 'CROSS-COUNTRY'
    CRACE, J
    NEW REVIEW, 1976, 3 (25): : 47 - 52
  • [10] CROSS-COUNTRY
    EMANUEL, E
    CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 1976, 114 (06) : 508 - &