Assessing the quality and completeness of reporting in health systems guidance for pandemics using the AGREE-HS tool

被引:0
|
作者
Ursic, Luka [1 ,2 ]
Zuljevic, Marija F. [2 ,3 ]
Vukovic, Miro [1 ,2 ]
Bralic, Nensi [1 ,2 ]
Roje, Rea [4 ]
Matas, Jakov [1 ,2 ]
Mijatovic, Antonija [1 ,2 ]
Sapunar, Damir [5 ]
Marusic, Ana [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Split, Dept Res Biomed & Hlth, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[2] Univ Split, Ctr Evidence Based Med, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[3] Univ Split, Dept Med Humanities, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
[4] Univ Hosp Split, Sci Dept, Split, Croatia
[5] Univ Split, Dept Histol & Embryol, Sch Med, Split, Croatia
关键词
GUIDELINES; PREVENTION; COVID-19;
D O I
10.7189/jogh.13.06050
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background During health emergencies, leading healthcare organisations, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), the European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC), and the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), provide guidance for public health response. Previous studies have evaluated clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) produced in response to epidemics or pandemics, yet few have focused on public health guidelines and recommendations. To address this gap, we assessed health systems guidance (HSG) produced by the WHO, the ECDC, and the CDC for the 2009 H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics. Methods We extracted HSG for the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics from the organisations' dedicated repositories and websites. After screening the retrieved documents for eligibility, five assessors evaluated them using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research & Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) tool to assess the completeness and transparency of reporting according to the five AGREE-HS domains: "Topic", "Participants", "Methods", "Recommendations", and "Implementability". Results Following the screening process, we included 108 HSG in the analysis. We observed statistically significant differences between the H1N1 and COVID-19 pandemics, with HSG issued during COVID-19 receiving higher AGREE-HS scores. The HSG produced by the CDC had significantly lower overall scores and single-domain scores compared to the WHO and ECDC. However, all HSG scored relatively low, under the median of 40 total points (range = 10-70), indicating incomplete reporting. The HSG produced by all three organisations received a median score <4 (range = 1-7) for the "Participants", "Methods", and "Implementability" domains. Conclusions There is still significant progress to be made in the quality and completeness of reporting in HSG issued during pandemics, especially regarding methodological approaches and the composition of the guidance development team. Due to their significant impact and importance for healthcare systems globally, HSG issued during future healthcare crises should adhere to best reporting practices to increase uptake by stakeholders and ensure public trust in healthcare organisations.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
    Melissa C. Brouwers
    Denis Ako-Arrey
    Karen Spithoff
    Marija Vukmirovic
    Ivan D. Florez
    John N. Lavis
    Francoise Cluzeau
    Govin Permanand
    Xavier Bosch-Capblanch
    Yaolong Chen
    [J]. Health Research Policy and Systems, 16
  • [2] Validity and usability testing of a health systems guidance appraisal tool, the AGREE-HS
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Ako-Arrey, Denis
    Spithoff, Karen
    Vukmirovic, Marija
    Florez, Ivan D.
    Lavis, John N.
    Cluzeau, Francoise
    Permanand, Govin
    Bosch-Capblanch, Xavier
    Chen, Yaolong
    [J]. HEALTH RESEARCH POLICY AND SYSTEMS, 2018, 16
  • [3] Assessment of health systems guidance using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation - Health Systems (AGREE-HS) instrument
    Brouwers, Melissa C.
    Lavis, John N.
    Spithoff, Karen
    Vukmirovic, Marija
    Florez, Ivan D.
    Velez, Marcela
    Kibria, Mohammad
    Sekercioglu, Nigar
    Kamler, Elizabeth
    Halladay, Jillian
    Sandhu, Jaspreet
    Ali, Ahmednur
    Jaffer, Anushka
    Kiflen, Ruhi
    Pemberton, Julia
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2019, 123 (07) : 646 - 651
  • [4] Appraising Evidence-Based Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Guidelines-PART I: A Systematic Review on Methodological Quality Using AGREE-HS
    te Brake, Hans
    Willems, Andrea
    Steen, Charlie
    Duckers, Michel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (05)
  • [5] Using geographical information systems and cartograms as a health service quality improvement tool
    Lovett, Derryn A.
    Poots, Alan J.
    Clements, Jake T. C.
    Green, Stuart A.
    Samarasundera, Edgar
    Bell, Derek
    [J]. SPATIAL AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 10 : 67 - 74
  • [6] Assessing the Nutritional Quality of Diets of Canadian Adults Using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System
    Jessri, Mahsa
    Nishi, Stephanie K.
    L'Abbe, Mary R.
    [J]. NUTRIENTS, 2015, 7 (12): : 10447 - 10468
  • [7] Quality appraisal of clinical nutrition practice guidelines for critically ill adult patients: a systematic review using the Advancing Guideline Development, Reporting and Evaluation in Health Care instrument II (AGREE-II) and AGREE-Recommendation Excellence (AGREE-REX)
    Cattani, Aline
    Teixeira, Paula Portal
    Eckert, Igor da Conceicao
    Busnello, Fernanda
    Gabriel, Franciele
    Stein, Airton
    Silva, Flavia Moraes
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2023, 129 (01) : 66 - 76
  • [8] Assessing the nutritional quality of diets of Canadian children and adolescents using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System
    Jessri, Mahsa
    Nishi, Stephanie K.
    L'Abbe, Mary R.
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 16
  • [9] Assessing the nutritional quality of diets of Canadian children and adolescents using the 2014 Health Canada Surveillance Tool Tier System
    Mahsa Jessri
    Stephanie K. Nishi
    Mary R. L’Abbe
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 16
  • [10] Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with breast cancer: a systematic and standardized comparison of available instruments using the EMPRO tool
    Stefano Maratia
    Sergio Cedillo
    Javier Rejas
    [J]. Quality of Life Research, 2016, 25 : 2467 - 2480