A framework for risk matrix design: A case of MASS navigation risk

被引:2
|
作者
Fan, Cunlong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Montewka, Jakub [4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Di [2 ,6 ,7 ]
Han, Zhepeng [2 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Maritime Univ, Coll Transport & Commun, 1550 Haigang Ave, Shanghai 201306, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Transportat & Logist Engn, 1040 Heping Ave, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Marine Technol, N-7491 Trondheim, Norway
[4] Gdansk Univ Technol, Gdansk, Poland
[5] Waterborne Transport Innovat, Gdansk, Poland
[6] Wuhan Univ Technol, State Key Lab Maritime Technol & Safety, 1040 Heping Ave, Wuhan 430063, Hubei, Peoples R China
[7] Inland Port & Shipping Ind Res Co Ltd Guangdong Pr, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
来源
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Risk matrix; Continuous probability consequence diagram; Interval Type-2 Fuzzy Set; Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process; Maritime Autonomous Surface Ship; Grounding; DECISION-MAKING; ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA; FUZZY AHP; SAFETY; VESSELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.aap.2024.107515
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Risk matrix, a tool for visualizing risk assessment results, is essential to facilitate the risk communication and risk management in risk-based decision-making processes related to new and unexplored socio-technical systems. The use of an appropriate risk matrix is discussed in the literature, but it is overlooked for emerging technologies such as Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS). In this study, a comprehensive framework for developing a risk matrix based on fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is proposed. In this framework, a linear function is defined where the risk index is treated as a response variable, while the probability and consequence indices are explanatory variables, with weights of these two indices representing their importance on given risk level. This significance is assessed by experts and quantified using AHP in interval type 2 fuzzy environment. A continuous risk diagram is then created and converted into a risk matrix that can be improved. To verify the feasibility of the proposed framework, a risk matrix is designed in the context of MASS grounding. The results show that the proposed approach is feasible. Our discussion results can provide new insights for the design of risk matrices and promote the management of MASS navigational risks.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A risk comparison framework for autonomous ships navigation
    Fan, Cunlong
    Montewka, Jakub
    Zhang, Di
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2022, 226
  • [2] A conceptual framework for risk matrix capitalization
    Hadef Hefaidh
    Djebabra Mébarek
    [J]. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2020, 11 : 755 - 764
  • [3] A conceptual framework for risk matrix capitalization
    Hefaidh, Hadef
    Mebarek, Djebabra
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEM ASSURANCE ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 11 (03) : 755 - 764
  • [4] A risk-based framework with Design Structure Matrix to select alternatives of product modernisation
    da Cunha Barbosa, Guilherme Eduardo
    Martha de Souza, Gilberto Francisco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2017, 28 (01) : 23 - 46
  • [5] Risk of collision for the navigation constellations: The case of the forthcoming Galileo
    [J]. Rossi, A., 1600, American Astronautical Society (52):
  • [6] Risk of collision for the navigation constellations: The case of the forthcoming Galileo
    Rossi, A
    Valsecchi, GB
    Perozzi, E
    [J]. SPACEFLIGHT MECHANICS 2003, PTS 1-3, 2003, 114 : 1217 - 1235
  • [7] Risk of Collision for the Navigation Constellations: The Case of the Forthcoming Galileo
    Rossi, A.
    Valsecchi, G.B.
    Perozzi, E.
    [J]. Journal of the Astronautical Sciences, 2004, 52 (04): : 455 - 474
  • [8] Risk Mitigation Framework for a Robust Design Process
    Narania, Sailesh
    Eshahawi, Tarek
    Gindy, Nabil
    Tang, Ying Kit
    Stoyanov, Stoyan
    Ridout, Stephen
    Bailey, Chris
    [J]. ESTC 2008: 2ND ELECTRONICS SYSTEM-INTEGRATION TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 1075 - +
  • [9] A framework for evaluating security risk in system design
    Wortman P.A.
    Chandy J.A.
    [J]. Discover Internet of Things, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [10] Probabilistic framework for product design optimization and risk management
    Keski-Rahkonen, J. K.
    [J]. 2017 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY ENGINEERING (ICRE 2017), 2018, 351