Crime Sharing: How the Sharing Economy may Impact Crime Victims

被引:2
|
作者
Stickle, Ben [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Dept Criminal Justice Adm, Murfreesboro, TN USA
[2] Middle Tennessee State Univ, Dept Criminal Justice Adm, 1301 E Main St,Box 238, Murfreesboro, TN 37132 USA
关键词
Crime; sharing economy; gig economy; disruptive innovation; victim; virtual controllers; alternative dispute resolution; UBER; SPACE; FEAR;
D O I
10.1080/15564886.2022.2159905
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The sharing economy (e.g., Uber, Lyft, Airbnb) is growing rapidly. It is a disruptive innovation in how people cooperate and share services and products in many ways. One of the likely outcomes of this change is reducing crime and transitioning from publicly provided justice systems to prevention and alternative dispute resolution. These changes occur because the sharing economy alters the opportunity structure of committing a crime and enhances safety by increasing digital place managers, guardians, and handlers. Further, the sharing economy places victims back at the forefront of concern and often identifies alternative dispute resolution outside the criminal justice system. These changes are evident from a content examination of 40 popular sharing platform websites. Findings indicate that 78% have a rating system in place, 50% have a help section for problems between sharers, 80% provide access to contracts on their websites, and 63% specify arbitration if disputes cannot be settled. These findings indicate that the sharing economy and private regulation are impacting the structure of the justice system, enhancing safety, reducing the private ownership of products, empowering victims with knowledge of sharing partners, and providing access to private arbitration to solve disputes.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The sharing economy and urban crime
    Weber, Bryan S.
    [J]. CITIES, 2024, 154
  • [2] Data sharing in crime prevention: Why and how
    Moss K.
    Pease K.
    [J]. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 2004, 6 (1): : 7 - 12
  • [3] SHARING CRIME CONTROL FUNDS
    VANAGUNA, S
    [J]. PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 1972, 32 (02) : 127 - 134
  • [4] Home sharing or crime sharing? Evidences of the relationship between Airbnb, crime and structural factors in Malaga, Spain
    Maldonado-Guzman, Diego J.
    Chamizo-Nieto, Francisco Jose
    Reyes-Corredera, Sergio
    [J]. GISCIENCE & REMOTE SENSING, 2024, 61 (01)
  • [5] SHARING CRIME ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES AND INFORMATION
    HARRIS, DR
    [J]. POLICE CHIEF, 1985, 52 (09): : 42 - 43
  • [6] Home sharing, property crime and disorder
    Roth, Jeffrey J.
    [J]. SAFER COMMUNITIES, 2021, 20 (01) : 42 - 56
  • [7] Sharing Economy or Skimming Economy? A Review of the Sharing Economy's Impact
    Plenter, Florian
    [J]. AMCIS 2017 PROCEEDINGS, 2017,
  • [8] Real crime, real victims: environmental crime victims and the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA)
    Jarrell, Melissa L.
    Ozymy, Joshua
    [J]. CRIME LAW AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2012, 58 (04) : 373 - 389
  • [9] Real crime, real victims: environmental crime victims and the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA)
    Melissa L. Jarrell
    Joshua Ozymy
    [J]. Crime, Law and Social Change, 2012, 58 : 373 - 389
  • [10] Ride-Sharing, Fatal Crashes, and Crime
    Dills, Angela K.
    Mulholland, Sean E.
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2018, 84 (04) : 965 - 991