Third-line Treatment for Metastatic Triple-negative Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Objective: Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) is an invasive histologic subtype with a poor prognosis and rapid progression. Currently, there is no standard therapy for the third-line treatment of mTNBC. In this study, we conducted a network meta-analysis to compare regimens and determine treatment outcomes. Methods: We performed a systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Bases, and the minutes of major conferences. Progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate were analyzed through network meta-analysis using the R software (R Core Team). The efficacy of the treatment regimens was compared using hazard ratios, odds ratios, and 95% CIs. Results: We evaluated 15 randomized controlled trials involving 6,010 patients. Compared with the physician's choice treatment, sacituzumab govitecan showed significant advantages in progression-free survival and overall survival, with hazard ratio values of 0.41 (95% CI: 0.32-0.52) and 0.48 (95% CI, 0.39-0.60). In terms of objective response rate, sacituzumab govitecan is the best-performing therapy (odds ratio: 10.82; 95% CI: 5.58-20.97). Adverse events among grades 3 to 5 adverse reactions, the incidence of neutropenia and leukopenia in each regimen was higher, whereas the incidence of fever, headache, hypertension, and rash was lower. Conclusion: Compared with the treatment of the physician's choice, sacituzumab govitecan appears more efficacious and is the preferred third-line treatment for mTNBC.