Microgap and bacterial microleakage during the osseointegration period: An in vitro assessment of the cover screw and healing abutment in a platform-switched implant system

Statement of problem. Microgap and bacterial microleakage at the implant-prosthetic abutment interface are recognized concerns for implant-supported restorations, leading to inflammation of the peri-implant tissues, with deleterious consequences for crestal bone levels. However, little is known regarding the interface established between the implant and the healing abutment or cover screw placed for the osseointegration phase. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to characterize the implant-cover screw and implant-healing abutment interfaces of a platform-switched implant system to determine the microgap and bacterial microleakage of the system and evaluate the biological response and functionality of an interface sealing agent. Material and methods. The interfacial microgaps of the implant-healing abutment and implantcover screw interfaces were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (n=10), and bacterial microleakage was evaluated after colonization with Enterococcus faecalis in a 30-day follow-up (n=10). The sealing efficacy and irritation potential of a silicone-based sealer were determined by using the hen's egg test on chorioallantoic membrane assay. The 2-sample t test was performed to compare means between groups, and data presented with the Kaplan-Meier method were compared statistically by using the log-rank test (a=.05). Results. The interfacial microgap was less than 2.5 mm for both systems. Bacterial microleakage was noted in approximately 50% of the specimens, particularly at early time points, at both the healing abutment and cover screw interfaces. The silicone-based sealer prevented bacterial leakage in the experimental setting. Conclusions. The implant-healing abutment and implant-cover screw interfaces of the tested system, despite the low microgap, allowed for bacterial microleakage after internal colonization. The use of a nonirritating silicone-based sealing agent effectively sealed the system. (J Prosthet Dent 2023;130:87-95)