Preferences of pregnant individuals to undergo labor after one cesarean in southern China

被引:1
|
作者
Rao, Jiaming [1 ]
Fan, Dazhi [1 ]
Lu, Demei [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Yan [2 ]
Guo, Xiaoling [2 ]
Liu, Zhengping [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Southern Med Univ, Affiliated Foshan Matern & Child Healthcare Hosp, Foshan Matern & Child Healthcare Hosp, Foshan Fetal Med Inst, Renminxi Rd 11, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Affiliated Foshan Matern & Child Healthcare Hosp, Foshan Matern & Child Healthcare Hosp, Dept Obstet, Renminxi Rd 11, Foshan 528000, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE | 2023年 / 50卷 / 04期
关键词
Chinese pregnant individuals; elective repeat cesarean delivery; incentive; labor after cesarean delivery (LAC); preferences; vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC); VAGINAL BIRTH; DELIVERY; OUTCOMES; INSIGHTS; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1111/birt.12743
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
BackgroundLabor after cesarean (LAC) remains an optional delivery method among healthy pregnant individuals. Exploring women's attitudes, preferences, reasons for previous cesarean delivery, and the incentives underlying pregnant individuals' preferences could help us understand their choice of delivery mode. In this study we evaluated the preferences and attitudes of eligible pregnant women regarding participation in a LAC in Foshan, China. MethodsA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 438 pregnant individuals with one prior cesarean delivery (CD) who attended their antenatal examination at a tertiary hospital in southern China, between November 1, 2018, and October 31, 2019. Information on demographic characteristics, obstetric data, preferences for LAC, and incentives for LAC were analyzed. ResultsOverall, 85.4% (374/438) of women preferred LAC if they did not have contraindications before delivery, whereas 12.3% (54/438) refused and 2.3% (10/438) were unsure. Participants reported that the most important factors affecting their willingness to undergo LAC were safety indicators (i.e., "ability of hospitals to perform emergency cesarean delivery" [score of 9.28 & PLUSMN; 1.86]), followed by accessibility indicators (i.e., "priority bed arrangements" [score of 9.17 & PLUSMN; 1.84]). Logistic regression analysis indicated that neonatal wellbeing with the prior CD was an independent influencing factor (OR = 2.235 [95%CI: 1.115-4.845], p = 0.024) affecting willingness to access LAC in the subsequent pregnancy. ConclusionsWe found a high preference for LAC among pregnant individuals without contraindications before delivery in southern China. Healthcare providers need to ensure access to LAC and increase pregnant individuals' LAC willingness through high-quality shared decsision-making in alignment with patient preferences.
引用
收藏
页码:988 / 995
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Duration time of labor progression for pregnant women of vaginal birth after cesarean in Hubei, China
    Li, Hao
    Yang, Lijun
    Peng, Jing
    Cheng, Wenxing
    Ma, Hongwen
    Wu, Shiyao
    Wen, Jiao
    Zhao, Yun
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 193 (03) : 1351 - 1358
  • [2] The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean
    Anjali J. Kaimal
    William A. Grobman
    Allison Bryant
    Cinthia Blat
    Peter Bacchetti
    Juan Gonzalez
    Mari-Paule Thiet
    Yamilee Bermingham
    Miriam Kuppermann
    Journal of Perinatology, 2019, 39 : 1340 - 1348
  • [3] The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean
    Kaimal, Anjali J.
    Grobman, William A.
    Bryant, Allison
    Blat, Cinthia
    Bacchetti, Peter
    Gonzalez, Juan
    Thiet, Mari-Paule
    Bermingham, Yamilee
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2019, 39 (10) : 1340 - 1348
  • [4] Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean
    Grobman, William A.
    Gilbert, Sharon
    Landon, Mark B.
    Spong, Catherine Y.
    Leveno, Kenneth J.
    Rouse, Dwight J.
    Varner, Michael W.
    Moawad, Atef H.
    Caritis, Steve N.
    Harper, Margaret
    Wapner, Ronald J.
    Sorokin, Yoram
    Miodovnik, Menachem
    Carpenter, Marshall
    O'Sullivan, Mary J.
    Sibai, Baha M.
    Langer, Oded
    Thorp, John M.
    Ramin, Susan M.
    Mercer, Brian M.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2007, 109 (02): : 262 - 269
  • [5] Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean
    Anjali J. Kaimal
    William A. Grobman
    Allison Bryant
    Cinthia Blat
    Peter Bacchetti
    Juan Gonzalez
    Mari-Paule Thiet
    Yamilee Bermingham
    Miriam Kuppermann
    Journal of Perinatology, 2019, 39 : 1696 - 1696
  • [6] Prediction of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in twin pregnant women
    Bang, Seung Hyun
    Lee, Seung Mi
    Oh, Sohee
    Sung, Su Jin
    Kim, Ran Hee
    Kim, Mi Rim
    Park, Chan-Wook
    Park, Joong Shin
    Jun, Jong Kwan
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 222 (01) : S310 - S310
  • [7] Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery in Individuals With Twin Pregnancies and Two Prior Cesarean Deliveries
    Mustafa, Hiba J.
    Abiad, May
    Grobman, William A.
    Mosesso, Kelly M.
    Daggy, Joanne K.
    Javinani, Ali
    Khalil, Asma
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    Landon, Mark B.
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2025, 145 (03): : 325 - 334
  • [8] Characteristics of Individuals Who Underwent Cesarean Delivery After Prolonged Labor
    Chaiken, Sarina
    Phillips, Jillian
    Packer, Claire
    Garg, Bharti
    Caughey, Aaron
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 139 : 71S - 71S
  • [9] Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor
    Hernandez-Martinez, Antonio
    Pascual-Pedreno, Ana I.
    Bano-Garnes, Ana B.
    Melero-Jimenez, Maria R.
    Tenias-Burillo, Jose M.
    Molina-Alarcon, Milagros
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2016, 293 (03) : 529 - 538
  • [10] Predictive model for risk of cesarean section in pregnant women after induction of labor
    Antonio Hernández-Martínez
    Ana I. Pascual-Pedreño
    Ana B. Baño-Garnés
    María R. Melero-Jiménez
    José M. Tenías-Burillo
    Milagros Molina-Alarcón
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2016, 293 : 529 - 538