USC 1983-Spending Clause - Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. Talevski

被引：0

|

作者：

不详

机构：

来源：

HARVARD LAW REVIEW | 2023年 / 137卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

D9 [法律]; DF [法律];

学科分类号：

0301 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：380 / 389

页数：10

相关论文

共 4 条

[1] Does the commerce clause eclipse the export clause?:: Making sense of United States v. United States Shoe Corp.
Kelly, CR
Amzel, D
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1999, 84 (01) : 129 - 198
[2] In the wake of Lough v. Brunswick Corp.:: Who decides experimental purpose in 35 USC 102(b) public use cases?
Webster, CP
WASHINGTON LAW REVIEW, 1998, 73 (04) : 1201 - 1225
[3] The all new (international) "people's court":: The future of the direct effect clause after Voest-Alpine trading USA Corp. v. Bank of China
Bensen, M
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 1999, 83 (04) : 997 - 1026
[4] Comment - The extent of a corporation's ability to constitute an original source under the False Claims Act Minnesota Ass'n of Nurse Anesthetists v. Allina Health System Corp.
Pruisner, ERD
MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW, 2003, 87 (04) : 1247 - 1292