Evaluation of the diagnostic efficiency of voided urine fluorescence in situ hybridization for predicting the pathology of preoperative "low-risk" upper tract urothelial carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Xu, Ben [1 ]
Zhang, Jia-En [1 ]
Ye, Lin [1 ]
Yuan, Chang-Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ First Hosp, Dept Urol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2023年 / 13卷
关键词
fluorescence in situ hybridization; upper tract urothelial carcinoma; tumor stage; tumor grade; low-risk; TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE BLADDER-CANCER; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; RADICAL NEPHROURETERECTOMY; OUTCOMES; GUIDELINES; SURVIVAL; TUMORS; GRADE; FISH;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1225428
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
ObjectivesTo evaluate the clinical utility of voided urine fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for predicting the pathology of preoperative "low-risk" upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MethodsInformation of patients preoperatively diagnosed with "low-risk" UTUC receiving radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) between May 2014 and October 2019 were retrospectively collected. All of the patients accepted the FISH test and then were divided into two groups according to the results of FISH. The diagnostic value of FISH was assessed through the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and area under the curve. Logistic regression analysis was applied to examine FISH as a predictive factor of tumor final stage and grade of preoperative "low-risk" UTUC. ResultsIn total, 129 patients were included. Of them, 70 (54.2%) were marked with positive FISH result. The difference at final pathology in tumor stage and tumor grade between these two groups of FISH (-) and FISH (+) had significantly statistical significance (p<0.001). Regarding to the tumor stage at final pathology, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FISH were 70.7 (58.9-80.3)68.5 (54.3-80.1)75.7 (63.7-84.8) and 62.7 (49.1-74.7), respectively. Regarding to the tumor grade at final pathology, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of FISH were 64.7 (53.5-74.6), 65.9 (50.0-79.1), 78.6 (66.8-87.1) and 49.1 (36.5-62.3), respectively. The results of logistic regression analysis indicated that FISH could predict the pathologic characteristics of preoperative "low-risk" UTUC independently. ConclusionsFISH was qualified with relatively high diagnostic estimates for predicting tumor stage and grade of preoperative "low-risk" UTUC, and could be an independent predictive factor in clinical practice. For preoperative "low-risk" UTUC patients but with positive FISH result, choosing nephron-sparing surgery may require special caution.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Voided Urine Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Testing for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Surveillance
    Johannes, James R.
    Nelson, Eric
    Bibbo, Marluce
    Bagley, Demetrius H.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (03): : 879 - 882
  • [2] Fluorescence in situ hybridization status of voided urine predicts invasive and high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma
    Su, Xiaohong
    Hao, Han
    Li, Xuesong
    He, Zhisong
    Gong, Kan
    Zhang, Cuijian
    Cai, Lin
    Zhang, Qian
    Yao, Lin
    Ding, Yi
    Gong, Yanqing
    Fang, Dong
    Zhang, Zheng
    Zhou, Liqun
    ONCOTARGET, 2017, 8 (16) : 26106 - 26111
  • [3] Predicting urothelial carcinoma recurrence with fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of urine
    Takahashi, T
    Lohse, CM
    Pankratz, VS
    Karnes, RJ
    Sarosdy, MF
    Jenkins, RB
    Lieber, MM
    Zincke, H
    Blute, ML
    Halling, KC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 167 (04): : 162 - 162
  • [4] The Impact of Fluorescence in situ Hybridization on the Staging of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
    Eismann, Lennert
    Mumm, Jan-Niclas
    Bohn, Lucas
    Wuelfing, Christian
    Knuechel-Clarke, Ruth
    Casuscelli, Jozefina
    Waidelich, Raphaela
    Stief, Christian G.
    Schlenker, Boris
    Rodler, Severin
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2021, 105 (7-8) : 631 - 636
  • [5] Comparison of Urine Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Upper Urothelial Tract Samples
    Reynolds, J. P.
    Voss, J. S.
    Kipp, B. R.
    Karnes, R. J.
    Nassar, A.
    Sebo, T. J.
    Clayton, A. C.
    Zhang, J.
    Henry, M. R.
    Halling, K. C.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2011, 91 : 102A - 102A
  • [6] Comparison of Urine Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Upper Urothelial Tract Samples
    Reynolds, Jordan P.
    Voss, Jesse S.
    Kipp, Benjamin R.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Nassar, Aziza
    Clayton, Amy C.
    Henry, Michael R.
    Sebo, Thomas J.
    Zhang, Jun
    Halling, Kevin C.
    CANCER CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2014, 122 (06) : 459 - 467
  • [7] Comparison of Urine Cytology and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization in Upper Urothelial Tract Samples
    Reynolds, J. P.
    Voss, J. S.
    Kipp, B. R.
    Karnes, R. J.
    Nassar, A.
    Sebo, T. J.
    Clayton, A. C.
    Zhang, J.
    Henry, M. R.
    Halling, K. C.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2011, 24 : 102A - 102A
  • [8] COMPARISON OF SELECTIVE UPPER TRACT FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) TESTING COMPARED TO BLADDER URINE FISH IN THE EVALUATION OF UPPER TRACT UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA (UTTCC)
    Johannes, J. R.
    Bibbo, M.
    Bajaj, R.
    Bagley, D.
    JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2010, 24 : A321 - A321
  • [9] Prospective evaluation of FISH for detecting upper tract urothelial carcinoma in voided urine specimens
    Yu, Qiubo
    Li, Yanan
    Li, Gang
    Li, Tinghong
    Zeng, Han
    Yang, Zhu
    Wang, Deling
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2016, 12 (01) : 183 - 188
  • [10] Utility of fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma
    Luo, Bin
    Li, Wen
    Deng, Chun-Hua
    Zheng, Fu-Fu
    Sun, Xiang-Zhou
    Wang, Dao-Hu
    Dai, Yu-Ping
    CANCER GENETICS AND CYTOGENETICS, 2009, 189 (02) : 93 - 97