Different ureteral access sheaths sizes for retrograde intrarenal surgery

PurposeThere is a trend toward miniaturization in endourological stone therapy. Good visibility, intrarenal pressures and temperature control should be ensured by ureteral sheaths. In the context of the present study, 10/12 Charr. sheaths and 12/14 Charr. sheaths for flexible ureterorenoscopy were investigated regarding stone-free rate, complication rate and efficacy for laser lithotripsy.MethodsFrom January 2020 to January 2022, 100 patients each with kidney stone up to 1.5 cm in diameter were included in the study. Use of a 12/14 Charr. vs. 10/12 Charr. ureteral sheath for flexible ureterorenoscopy was compared. Perioperative data, stone size, volume and density, laser energy, laser duration, stone-free rates and complications based on Clavien-Dindo classification were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsFor both groups of ureteral access sheaths, there were no differences in median surgery duration (10/12 Charr: 29 min (7-105 min) vs. 12/14 Charr: 34 min (9-95 min); p = 0.33), overall complication rate (p = 0.61) and hospitalization (p = 0.155). There were no differences in stone-free rates (97.9% vs. 92.7%, p = 0.37). Laser lithotripsy duration usingholmium laser was 1.9 min (0.1-10.8 min) vs. 3.8 min (0.2-20.7 min) (p < 0.01) and applied laser energy was 3.1 J (0.15 J-10.29 J) vs. 6.8 J (1.07 J-26.77 J) (p < 0.01) for 12/14 Charr. sheaths and 10/12 Charr. sheaths, respectively.ConclusionIn terms of stone-free rates, there are no differences between the 10/12 and 12/14 Charr. ureteral access sheaths. The laser duration and energy was increased with 10/12 Charr. sheaths without showing increased risk for clinical complications like trauma or inflammation.