Fractional Flow Reserve and Angiography Guided Complete Revascularization in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Using a network meta-analysis, this study compared fractional flow reserve (FFR) guided with angiography-guided revascularization of non-culprit lesions in ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We also assessed if early complete revascularization is superior to delayed revascularization. We conducted a network meta-analysis using Net Meta XL of trials of STEMI patients with multivessel disease and compared revascularization strategies. The primary outcomes of interest were rate of revascularization, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. Ten studies were included in our analysis comprising 7981 patients with 4484 patients undergoing complete revascularization and 3497 patients with culprit-only revascularization. There was no significant reduction in all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization using FFR guidance. There was significant reduction in repeat revascularization with complete revascularization irrespective of timing of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with the culprit-only group. There was an overall trend favoring earlier revascularization. For patients with multivessel disease presenting with ST-elevation MI, complete revascularization significantly reduces repeat revascularization compared with culprit-only treatment. FFR guidance is non-superior to angiography-guided revascularization. Furthermore, there was significant reduction in repeat revascularization irrespective of timing of PCI to non-culprit vessels.